The Changing Characters Discussion
#1
Banned by request
Thread Starter
The Changing Characters Discussion
Inspired by the Fantastic Four thread, I figured I'd give this discussion its own separate spotlight.
What elements of a character should never be changed? What elements can be changed? Why?
Would Spider-Man (specifically Peter Parker) work if he were black, or a woman, or rich?
Does Elementary diminish the Sherlock Holmes stories by making Watson a woman?
For my part, I think as long as the character's personality traits are intact, the gender, race, and socioeconomic status don't matter so much, unless those are pivotal to the character. For example, Othello must be a Moor in order for that story to work. Peter Parker? His race doesn't really affect the Spider-Man story.
What elements of a character should never be changed? What elements can be changed? Why?
Would Spider-Man (specifically Peter Parker) work if he were black, or a woman, or rich?
Does Elementary diminish the Sherlock Holmes stories by making Watson a woman?
For my part, I think as long as the character's personality traits are intact, the gender, race, and socioeconomic status don't matter so much, unless those are pivotal to the character. For example, Othello must be a Moor in order for that story to work. Peter Parker? His race doesn't really affect the Spider-Man story.
#2
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: The Changing Characters Discussion
I think most characters in comic-based TV or film should be kept in line with their print counterparts, unless the project in question is completely different from established canon. To do otherwise would upset a lot of fans, but more importantly, would go against the original creators' intent.
#3
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Re: The Changing Characters Discussion
For comic books, they should stay as close to the look as possible...most of the time. Some characters have VERY unique or cultural/racial looks to them. In the case of someone like Electro...he is a nobody. It was always the costume. Buuuut from what I see with Foxx's look. I dunno, not digging it.
#4
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The Changing Characters Discussion
Don't care, as long as the story stays true to the character, and it doesn't violate any historical/social sense.
Black James Bond in 2013? No problem. In 1962? Problem. See Jim West and Captain America too.
Black Spider-Man or Perry White? No problem at all.
I find it utterly laughable that people claim that changing a character's ethnicity somehow violates its creators' "original intent"... as if said creators set out to create a cool WHITE character, first and foremost.
Black James Bond in 2013? No problem. In 1962? Problem. See Jim West and Captain America too.
Black Spider-Man or Perry White? No problem at all.
I find it utterly laughable that people claim that changing a character's ethnicity somehow violates its creators' "original intent"... as if said creators set out to create a cool WHITE character, first and foremost.
#5
#6
Re: The Changing Characters Discussion
Don't care, as long as the story stays true to the character, and it doesn't violate any historical/social sense.
Black James Bond in 2013? No problem. In 1962? Problem. See Jim West and Captain America too.
Black Spider-Man or Perry White? No problem at all.
I find it utterly laughable that people claim that changing a character's ethnicity somehow violates its creators' "original intent"... as if said creators set out to create a cool WHITE character, first and foremost.
Black James Bond in 2013? No problem. In 1962? Problem. See Jim West and Captain America too.
Black Spider-Man or Perry White? No problem at all.
I find it utterly laughable that people claim that changing a character's ethnicity somehow violates its creators' "original intent"... as if said creators set out to create a cool WHITE character, first and foremost.
#7
RIP
#8
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The Changing Characters Discussion
Spider-Man was created to riff on great power/responsibility and show the hero as a trod-upon common man.
Big difference between the two.
#12
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Formerly known as Groucho AND Bandoman/Death Moans, Iowa
Posts: 18,295
Received 372 Likes
on
266 Posts
Re: The Changing Characters Discussion
Spider-Man: A teenage boy from Queens living with his aunt after his parents died and his uncle was murdered?
Sorry, but a background like that just screams white guy.
Sorry, but a background like that just screams white guy.
#13
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: The Changing Characters Discussion
Generally, it should be interchangeable, but there are a few problems.
Most of our beloved comic book characters are from the 60's and such. So as PC as we want to be today, if we're taking characters from a more segregated time, we have a paradox.
For example, I would never beleive that a black guy would be named Johnny Storm. That would just be ignoring too much in lieu of being PC.
A character like Kingpin or Electro, sure. But it's been pointed out that these are more one-dimensional villains. Racial identity tends to be more tied to a more thorough character exploration that you'd see with a hero.
You know, it'd be nice if we could create NEW characters that are just as effective as the ones that came out 50 years ago.
Most of our beloved comic book characters are from the 60's and such. So as PC as we want to be today, if we're taking characters from a more segregated time, we have a paradox.
For example, I would never beleive that a black guy would be named Johnny Storm. That would just be ignoring too much in lieu of being PC.
A character like Kingpin or Electro, sure. But it's been pointed out that these are more one-dimensional villains. Racial identity tends to be more tied to a more thorough character exploration that you'd see with a hero.
You know, it'd be nice if we could create NEW characters that are just as effective as the ones that came out 50 years ago.
#17
Moderator
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: The Changing Characters Discussion
There's a fan theory that James Bond is a code name used by multiple agents: Dalton's went rogue, Lazenby's quit when his wife died, etc. In Quantum of Solace the one character acknowledged that his name wasn't his real name.
That's the only way I can wrap my head around Judi Dench's M still being present for a newly-00 status Bond in Casino Royale.
So sure any British male citizen can be James Bond.
That's the only way I can wrap my head around Judi Dench's M still being present for a newly-00 status Bond in Casino Royale.
So sure any British male citizen can be James Bond.
#22
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The Changing Characters Discussion
There's a fan theory that James Bond is a code name used by multiple agents: Dalton's went rogue, Lazenby's quit when his wife died, etc. In Quantum of Solace the one character acknowledged that his name wasn't his real name.
That's the only way I can wrap my head around Judi Dench's M still being present for a newly-00 status Bond in Casino Royale.
That's the only way I can wrap my head around Judi Dench's M still being present for a newly-00 status Bond in Casino Royale.
#23
Moderator
#25
Banned by request
Thread Starter
Re: The Changing Characters Discussion
That was a deliberate role reversal, which worked because the character of Othello was still in contrast to everyone around him. Had Patrick Stewart played Othello with an all-white cast, it wouldn't have worked.