View Poll Results: WETA or ILM: who does better FX work?
WETA
3
60.00%
ILM
2
40.00%
Voters: 5. You may not vote on this poll
WETA vs. ILM : who makes better FX?
12-20-09, 05:02 PM
#1
DVD Talk Legend
Thread Starter
WETA vs. ILM : who makes better FX?
Right now I would have to go with WETA. LOTR, King Kong, and Avatar are all great showcases. ILM was good in its time, but lately they haven't done much that I would call impressive, and while all CGI is fake, theirs is starting to look moreso comparatively speaking.
EDIT: Let's not make this about who will have the bigger legacy, as ILM pretty much made modern FX possible. Let's go with who's currently the best game in town and who will be in the possible future.
EDIT: Let's not make this about who will have the bigger legacy, as ILM pretty much made modern FX possible. Let's go with who's currently the best game in town and who will be in the possible future.
Last edited by Dr. DVD; 12-20-09 at 05:50 PM. Reason: Clarification
12-20-09, 05:25 PM
#3
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: United States
Posts: 2,506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: WETA vs. ILM : who makes better FX?
Repeat thread. http://forum.dvdtalk.com/movie-talk/...m-vs-weta.html
12-20-09, 05:25 PM
#4
Re: WETA vs. ILM : who makes better FX?
I think we did this topic a few months ago, but I'm sticking with WETA.
ILM when they go all out, are top of the game, but they rarely do that anymore. Star Trek and Transformers are their only movies this year that comes close to Avatar or District 9 in the SFX department.
ILM when they go all out, are top of the game, but they rarely do that anymore. Star Trek and Transformers are their only movies this year that comes close to Avatar or District 9 in the SFX department.
12-20-09, 06:12 PM
#5
Banned by request
Re: WETA vs. ILM : who makes better FX?
Repeat thread. http://forum.dvdtalk.com/movie-talk/...m-vs-weta.html
