Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters
View Poll Results: ILM or Weta
ILM
51
60.00%
Weta
34
40.00%
Voters: 85. You may not vote on this poll

ILM vs Weta

Old 07-09-09, 09:26 PM
  #1  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: United States
Posts: 2,506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ILM vs Weta

Which one do you think does better CGI?

Weta Films
Lord of the Rings
King Kong
Fantastic Four 2
The Day the Earth Stood Still
Avatar
etc.........

ILM Films
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
Jurassic Park
DragonHeart
Terminator
The Abyss
Star Trek
etc..........
Old 07-09-09, 09:40 PM
  #2  
DVD Talk Reviewer
 
Boba Fett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,283
Received 38 Likes on 30 Posts
Re: ILM vs Weta

Currently? WETA.

ILM had a good run and WETA wouldn't be around if it wasn't for them, but the effects on stuff like Lord of the Rings is in a whole other league, compared to the Star Wars prequels, the one series ILM should do top notch work on.
Old 07-09-09, 09:40 PM
  #3  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
covenant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,131
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
Re: ILM vs Weta

No Pole?
Old 07-09-09, 09:41 PM
  #4  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Somewhere between Heaven and Hell
Posts: 34,032
Received 708 Likes on 516 Posts
Re: ILM vs Weta

WETA 4 Oscars
ILM 16 Oscars
Old 07-09-09, 09:42 PM
  #5  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,368
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: ILM vs Weta

Originally Posted by Blu Man
Which one do you think does better CGI?

Weta Films: Lord of the Rings and King Kong

ILM Films: Transformers and Star Trek
I think WETA does a better job of making things seamless. But I only saw LOTR and King Kong from WETA.

The ILM films are all old and dated except for Transformers and Star Trek... which I think anybody can do the textures/lighting for metal and spaceships.
Old 07-09-09, 09:43 PM
  #6  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 39,236
Received 598 Likes on 462 Posts
Re: ILM vs Weta

I prefer ILM's CGI efforts. The folk at Weta are creative and talented but ILM's stuff is usually better.

That said, ILM has had some real stinkers (The Mummy Returns and Van Helsing, for example).
Old 07-09-09, 09:43 PM
  #7  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,368
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: ILM vs Weta

Originally Posted by covenant
No Pole?
I prefer real strippers, not CGI.
Old 07-09-09, 09:49 PM
  #8  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Kal-El's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Fortress of Solitude
Posts: 7,992
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Re: ILM vs Weta

You're forgetting the Pirates Trilogy for ILM. Davey Jones was crazy good. I think their best work was Starship Troopers though.
Old 07-09-09, 09:52 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: ILM vs Weta

ILM is still at the top in my opinion

LOTR has a lot of dodgy CGI, as does King Kong, though Kong himself is an absolute marvel

Still, nothing Weta has done tops Davy Jones or the best material in Transformers
Old 07-09-09, 09:58 PM
  #10  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,368
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: ILM vs Weta

Forgot about Davy Jones.
Old 07-09-09, 10:01 PM
  #11  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 39,236
Received 598 Likes on 462 Posts
Re: ILM vs Weta

Starship Troopers has definitely stood the test of time.

LOTR:FOTR has some really piss poor CGI. LOTR:TTT was better but it's most prized CGI creation (Gollum) was vastly over-rated. Sometimes he looks fantastic but others he's not too good. LOTR:ROTK was another improvement but it still had really crappy effects work (Smeagol being dragged by the fish) amidst some great effects work (Shelob).

I didn't really care for anything in King Kong. It all seemed too artificial.

If I recall correctly, Weta shared a hand in some of the fine CGI on display in Master and Commander.
Old 07-09-09, 10:16 PM
  #12  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: United States
Posts: 2,506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: ILM vs Weta

Pole added.

Davy Jones from ILM was incredible and so are all the Transformers. Plus ILM kinda started the wholw thing with The Abyss and then Jurassic Park. King Kong looked great but not as good as a lot of stuff ILM has done. I haven't seen Lord of the Rings in a very long time so I can comment on that. From what i've heard Avatar is going to blow us away. My vote goes to.....................................ILM.
Old 07-09-09, 10:17 PM
  #13  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: ILM vs Weta

Who does the effects for Harry Potter? I was shocked when I found out that they CGed parts of Voldemort's face, very nicely done...
Old 07-09-09, 10:30 PM
  #14  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: United States
Posts: 2,506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: ILM vs Weta

Originally Posted by anubis2005x
who does the effects for harry potter? I was shocked when i found out that they cged parts of voldemort's face, very nicely done...
ILM does the Harry Potter films.
Old 07-09-09, 10:57 PM
  #15  
DVD Talk Hero
 
TomOpus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 40,112
Received 1,286 Likes on 935 Posts
Re: ILM vs Weta

ILM

Weta is great but King Kong was so uneven. There was some amazing CGI... yet we also got the craptastic Dino stampede. That scene alone made me cringe.
Old 07-09-09, 11:19 PM
  #16  
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Re: ILM vs Weta

T2 anyone? ILM, all the way. Weta is still a bit young compared to what ILM has done.
Old 07-09-09, 11:45 PM
  #17  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
fumanstan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 55,349
Received 26 Likes on 14 Posts
Re: ILM vs Weta

ILM easily. I think the work on LOTR was a bit overrated.
Old 07-09-09, 11:52 PM
  #18  
Moderator
 
Groucho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 71,383
Received 122 Likes on 84 Posts
Re: ILM vs Weta

ILM -- Avatar was crap!
Old 07-10-09, 12:56 AM
  #19  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Sacramento, Calif.
Posts: 13,525
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Re: ILM vs Weta

ILM, if not for T2 alone which even after almost 20 years still holds up.

Who worked on the Matrix sequels? Reloaded looks like shit today.
Old 07-10-09, 01:52 AM
  #20  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,401
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
Re: ILM vs Weta

I think Imageworks vs Weta would be a better matchup. Both are pretty new compared to ILM.
Old 07-10-09, 04:35 AM
  #21  
Banned by request
 
Supermallet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Termite Terrace
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Re: ILM vs Weta

ILM has been the industry leader for so long we seem to forget just how many amazing strides they made, from Sherlock Jr. to T2 to Jurassic Park and Pirates. WETA has done a surprisingly good job of carving out a space for themselves, and I would say they're second currently. Avatar could be a game changer, but we don't know anything about how the final product looks yet.

Imageworks has never done anything that rivals ILM or WETA, imo, and Watchmen did nothing to change my mind.
Old 07-10-09, 05:31 AM
  #22  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: So Cal
Posts: 7,071
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: ILM vs Weta

You can't always put it on the effects house - how good the CGI is depends just as much on directing, storyboarding, and cinematography as technology.
Old 07-10-09, 05:32 AM
  #23  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
caligulathegod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Grove City OH
Posts: 3,851
Received 40 Likes on 24 Posts
Re: ILM vs Weta

In all fairness, some of the early successes that ILM is getting praised for, such as T2 and Jurassic Park, have less CGI in them than meets the eye. When those two films came out, the hype was for the CGI but most of the special effects is model work and live-action animatronics. The liquid metal Terminator special effects were mostly live-action models and the CGI merely morphed between the extremes. The shot where he pours into the Helicopter was about 3 or 4 different models and the cgi just blended the dissolves between them. Same with the scenes where he gets heavy shotgun fire and has holes blasted into him or has his head blasted nearly off. Jurassic Park mostly had animatronic dinos except for quick shots of them running (usually in the dark lit scenes). The few CGI shots in broad daylight look as phony as any early CGI ever done (such as the Bronto/Apats). Counting up screen time, both of those films had barely a couple minutes of actual CGI compared to today's films where the special effects are almost entirely CGI.


Another point to make is rarely does one effects house do all the work in a film. They farm out a lot to outside companies so they can meet release dates. So anytime you ever watch a film and notice some really good CGI and some really mediocre or even bad CGI, then chances are you are seeing outside vendor's work interspersed with the actual company's work. They put their name on the work, so they deserve the praise or blame, but as a practical matter unless the hired work is atrocious, they really don't have the time or budgets to bring absolutely every shot up to the company standards so it's kind of unfair to damn a company's work because 100% of the CGI wasn't up to snuff.

Last edited by caligulathegod; 07-10-09 at 10:15 AM.
Old 07-10-09, 07:29 AM
  #24  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Michael Corvin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 62,508
Received 909 Likes on 644 Posts
Re: ILM vs Weta

Originally Posted by Labor
ILM is still at the top in my opinion

LOTR has a lot of dodgy CGI, as does King Kong, though Kong himself is an absolute marvel
Old 07-10-09, 08:00 AM
  #25  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: ILM vs Weta

Also, ILM has different teams for different movies. Just like video game producers, sometimes they are rushed to meet a release date.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.