DVD Talk
Speak correctly, or build a big bunker - Kathleen Parker [Archive] - DVD Talk Forum
 
Best Sellers
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Tinker Bell
Buy: $29.99 $15.49
8.
9.
10.
DVD Blowouts
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

PDA
DVD Reviews

View Full Version : Speak correctly, or build a big bunker - Kathleen Parker


hahn
10-02-08, 05:20 PM
This didn't seem to fit any of the current threads, but feel free to move it if you think it does.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/chi-oped1001parkeroct01,0,3151779.column
WASHINGTON — Allow me to introduce myself. I am a traitor and an idiot. Also, my mother should have aborted me and left me in a Dumpster, but since she didn't, I should "off" myself.

Those are just a few nuggets randomly selected from thousands of e-mails written in response to my column suggesting that Sarah Palin is out of her league and should step down.

Who says public discourse hasn't deteriorated?

The fierce reaction to my column has been both bracing and enlightening. After 20 years of column writing, I'm familiar with angry mail. But the past few days have produced responses of a different order. Not just angry, but vicious and threatening.

Some of my usual readers feel betrayed because I previously have written favorably of Palin. By changing my mind and saying so, I am viewed as a traitor to the Republican Party—not a "true" conservative.

Palin's fans say they like her specifically because she's an outsider, not part of the Washington club. When she flubs during interviews, they identify with that too. "You see the lack of polish, we applaud it," one reader wrote.

Of course, there's a difference between a lack of polish and a lack of coherence. Some of Palin's interview responses can't even be critiqued on their merits because they're so nonsensical. "Let Sarah be Sarah" has become the latest rallying cry among my colleagues on the right. She'll be fine if we just leave her alone, they say. Between prayers, I might add.

Not all my mail has been mean-spirited. A fair number expressed polite disappointment; others relief and gratitude. Still others offered reasonable arguments aimed at changing my mind. I may yet.

In the meantime, this assault and my decision to write about it aren't really about me—or even Sarah Palin. The mailbag is about us, our country, and what we really believe.

That we have become a partisan nation is no secret. This week has provided a vivid example of where rabid partisanship leads with the failure of Congress to pass a bailout bill vitally needed to keep our economy from unraveling.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi gave a partisan speech, blaming the credit crisis on the Bush administration (omitting the Clinton administration's role in launching the subprime lending debacle). Republicans responded by voting against the bill.

Everyone's to blame, by the way.

Such extreme partisanship has a crippling effect on government, which may be desirable at times, but not now. More important in the long term is the less-tangible effect of stifling free speech. My mail paints an ugly picture and a bleak future if we do not soon correct ourselves.

The picture is this: Anyone who dares express an opinion that runs counter to the party line will be silenced. That doesn't sound American to me, but Stalin would approve. Readers have every right to reject my opinion. But when we decide that a person is a traitor and should die for having an opinion different than one's own, then we cross into territory that puts all freedoms at risk. (I hear you, Dixie Chicks.)

Our day of reckoning, indeed, may be upon us. Between war and economic collapse, we have enormous challenges. It will take the best of everyone to solve them. That process begins minimally with a commitment to engage in civil discourse and a cease-fire in the war against unwelcome ideas.

In that spirit, may Sarah Palin be fearless in Thursday's debate and speak her true mind.

Kathleen Parker is a syndicated columnist.kparker@kparker.comI'm breathing a sigh of relief, because it seems at long last, there are some intellectually honest conservatives who are waking up to the fact that something's not right with this country and they have chosen to side with some very dangerous extreme individuals with whom they share philosophies with only in the very most superficial terms. If Obama wins this election, I think we all actually owe a big debt of gratitude to Sarah Palin who exposed the inconsistencies of beliefs in the current conservative group. I have never been so much against core conservative beliefs as I have been how they justify forcing it down people's throats. That applies to both here AND abroad.

You know it's rather funny. A coworker mentioned last week that the plus side to an economic downturn is that it's been shown that people tend to put disagreements aside during recessions and get back to working together as a nation. I think some of that is showing through in some of the economic discussions. Food for thought.

CaptainMarvel
10-02-08, 06:51 PM
An article based on Sarah Palin, followed by commentary on the ramifications of Palin's nomination on the nation. I wish we had a Palin related thread for this.

hahn
10-02-08, 06:55 PM
An article based on Sarah Palin, followed by commentary on the ramifications of Palin's nomination on the nation. I wish we had a Palin related thread for this.It's not really about Sarah Palin. It's about the reaction to Kathleen writing about her. Ultimately, it's about the broader theme of how we deal with differing opinions in the current charged political atmosphere.

CaptainMarvel
10-02-08, 07:35 PM
It's still an article that heavily references Palin, and itself references another article on Palin, and is followed up with user commentary involving Palin. It seems like the entire commentary orbits around Palin.

But I'm game for giving it its own thread if the mods want. I agree with the article, but comments like:
there are some intellectually honest conservatives who are waking up to the fact that something's not right with this country

and:
I have never been so much against core conservative beliefs as I have been how they justify forcing it down people's throats.

seem ironic to me, given the context of the article. An article about how divisive politics has become, and about how both sides are to blame, is followed up with commentary that seems to only recognize conservatives as the troubled ones. Conservatives are "waking up to the fact" that there's something wrong with the country, as if we're blind or in denial? Conservatives "force[ beliefs] down people's throats," as if liberals somehow escape that vice? Anybody who sat through months of "no blood for oil" or years of "man made global warming is beyond dispute" can attest that's not the case.

The notion that "conservatives have been blind or misguided, but maybe we'll now see the light," seems a little condescending.

hahn
10-02-08, 08:12 PM
It's still an article that heavily references Palin, and itself references another article on Palin, and is followed up with user commentary involving Palin. It seems like the entire commentary orbits around Palin.

But I'm game for giving it its own thread if the mods want. I agree with the article, but comments like:

and:

seem ironic to me, given the context of the article. An article about how divisive politics has become, and about how both sides are to blame, is followed up with commentary that seems to only recognize conservatives as the troubled ones. Conservatives are "waking up to the fact" that there's something wrong with the country, as if we're blind or in denial? Conservatives "force[ beliefs] down people's throats," as if liberals somehow escape that vice? Anybody who sat through months of "no blood for oil" or years of "man made global warming is beyond dispute" can attest that's not the case.

The notion that "conservatives have been blind or misguided, but maybe we'll now see the light," seems a little condescending.I'm talking about a subset of conservatives who are capable of thinking beyond party lines, not everyone who's conservative. That's why I said "intellectually honest conservatives". Some are not so intellectually honest.

CaptainMarvel
10-02-08, 10:05 PM
I'm talking about a subset of conservatives who are capable of thinking beyond party lines, not everyone who's conservative. That's why I said "intellectually honest conservatives". Some are not so intellectually honest.

Why talk about just "intellectually honest conservatives" versus "intellectually honest people" in general? Is it your contention that there aren't "intellectually dishonest liberals," such as the ones who laughed at the idea that Obama didn't have enough experience, but that screamed about Palin's lack of experience?

Or are you just stating that you think intellectually dishonest conservatives are a problem while the intellectually dishonest liberals aren't?

Posting an article about the divisiveness of rhetoric in politics, then singling out a single partisan subset while ignoring the mirror partisan subset on your side seems odd.

hahn
10-03-08, 01:35 AM
Psst. Read the%