DVD Talk
What is the problem with chairmen of the House Ways and Means Committee? [Archive] - DVD Talk Forum
 
Best Sellers
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Tinker Bell
Buy: $29.99 $15.49
7.
8.
9.
10.
DVD Blowouts
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Ratatouille
Buy: $29.99 $15.99

PDA
DVD Reviews

View Full Version : What is the problem with chairmen of the House Ways and Means Committee?


X
09-09-08, 03:35 PM
There was Rostenkowski who went to the slammer, now Rangel. These are the guys writing the tax policy they can't seem to be able to follow. -rolleyes-

Tax chairman Rangel failed to report income

By Daniel Trotta
Reuters
Friday, September 5, 2008; 1:22 PM

NEW YORK (Reuters) - House Rep. Charles Rangel, chairman of the tax-writing Ways and Means Committee, failed to report $75,000 of income from a villa he owns in the Dominican Republic, his attorney said on Friday.

The Democratic congressman, who has represented New York City's Harlem district for 38 years, plans to file an amendment to his previous tax returns and likely has no federal tax liability on the investment, lawyer Lanny Davis said.

Rangel probably owes nothing to the federal government because of depreciation and foreign tax credit, but he may owe a few thousand dollars to the state of New York, Davis said, calling Rangel's omission an "honest error" that he only realized due to recent media reports.

Details about the three-bedroom, three-bathroom beachfront home were first reported in the New York Post on Sunday and again in The New York Times on Friday.

Davis declined to comment on whether the matter embarrassed the head of the committee that drafts federal tax laws.

Rangel said in a statement his accountant would review the matter and that he would follow any recommendations.

Rangel has owned the villa at the Punta Cana Resort and Club since 1988 and rents it for as much as $500 per night, the Times said, but he never reported the income on his federal or state tax returns. Davis stressed that all investors in the time-share resort pay expenses and draw income on the resort collectively.

Rangel paid $80,000 for the unit, with a down payment of $28,500, in 1988 and spent $23,000 on renovations in 2003, Davis said. Discounting the down payment, his profit from the property over 20 years was a few hundred dollars, or less than 1 percent, Davis said.

"That's some cash cow," Davis said, mocking a headline in the Post.

The resort sent twice-annual statements to Rangel that detailed the reduction in his debt on the property, Davis said. Those statements were received by Rangel's wife and not given to the accountant, the lawyer said.

Rangel's finances have been under scrutiny since July, when the Times reported that the lawmaker lived in multiple reduced-rent apartments provided under a plan to preserve affordable housing in New York City.

Rangel defended his right to maintain those below-market rentals, but agreed to give up an office that he used for campaign activities.

Rangel has asked for a congressional ethics inquiry on that matter and was considering requesting a similar review of his Dominican property, Davis said.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/05/AR2008090502078.htmlRangel Says He Didn't Know of Loan Terms
Villa Deal Compounds Controversy

By Christopher Lee
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, September 6, 2008; Page A03

Rep. Charles B. Rangel (D-N.Y.) did not know that the Caribbean resort villa he purchased 20 years ago was financed with a no-interest mortgage from the developer and has generated $75,000 in income that he should have reported on tax and financial disclosure forms, his lawyer said yesterday.

Lanny Davis said the powerful chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, which oversees complex tax policy, was unaware until this week of the financial terms surrounding the Dominican Republic property because the developer of the Punta Cana Yacht Club did not regularly send annual financial statements to property owners.

The undisclosed income and favorable loan terms compounded the ethical controversies already enveloping the 38-year veteran of Congress.

In July, the Democrat from New York asked the House Ethics Committee to examine his fundraising entreaties to corporations and foundations on behalf of a university academic center that bears his name, and into his rental of several Harlem apartments at below-market rates.


Davis said Rangel likely will amend his federal, state and New York City tax returns and update his congressional financial disclosure filings. He also will ask the ethics committee to add the Caribbean real estate deal to its inquiry.

"We are confident that Mr. Rangel has done nothing wrong," he said.

That will not assuage the congressman's critics. Kenneth Boehm, chairman of the National Legal and Policy Center, said in a statement yesterday that his nonprofit group, which promotes ethics in public service, had filed complaints against Rangel with the Justice Department and the Internal Revenue Service.

"Ordinary citizens are prosecuted all the time for tax evasion," Boehm said. "Rangel should not get special treatment just because his committee writes the tax laws. A full investigation of this matter is warranted."

Rangel paid $82,750 for the beachfront Casita 412 in 1988, financed in part by a $52,000 loan from the developer that since 1990 has been interest-free, according to Davis and records released by the resort and Rangel's office. Rangel bought the property at the suggestion of Theodore W. Kheel, a friend and New York labor arbitrator who was a principal investor in the project. Proceeds from rentals at the resort property were automatically credited toward paying down the mortgage, Davis said, so the money did not flow directly into Rangel's pocket.

"He simply didn't realize that there was any actual income being generated, since he never received . . . any checks over the last 20 years," Davis said. "So he never realized there was any income tax filing issue or financial disclosure issue. Now that he knows what he knows, we're going to fix all that."

Two years after the opening of the property, the developer waived the interest rate on loans made to Rangel and other foreign backers among the initial investors known as "pioneers" because rental income had not met expectations, according to a written statement this week from Jose Oliva, director of the Yacht Club.

"Mr. Rangel did not receive individual preferential treatment," Davis said.

The initial loan was paid off by 2003, and Rangel borrowed an additional $23,000 to expand the unit to three bedrooms, Davis said. Rangel's share of rental revenue from the resort then went to pay off that loan, including about $1,100 in interest.

Only recently, in June, did Rangel see his first cash payment from the property, about $775 dollars, Davis said.

Rangel once valued the property at $250,000 or more on his federal disclosure forms, but Davis said it would be expected to fetch far less these days in the slumping real estate market.

The New York Post first disclosed Rangel's unreported income from the property in Sunday's editions. Rangel said in a statement that he had asked his accountant to review all the financial data concerning the Caribbean property. "Once my accountant obtains and verifies the facts, I will follow his recommendations," he said.

Davis said he expects Rangel to have no federal income tax liability from the villa because the congressman can deduct the taxes paid to the Dominican Republic and because he is entitled to deduct depreciation on the property. He estimated the back city and state taxes owed to be "in the several-thousand-dollar range."

Kevin Smith, a spokesman for House Minority Leader John A. Boehner (R-Ohio), called it "more than just a little ironic" that the leader of the tax-writing committee had not paid the U.S. taxes on income from his own luxury vacation home.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/05/AR2008090503442.html

wendersfan
09-09-08, 03:47 PM
Wilbur Mills wasn't an altar boy either.

wishbone
09-09-08, 03:50 PM
Surely Rep Rangel has accountants that could have advised him on this dealing.

X
09-09-08, 03:51 PM
Wilbur Mills wasn't an altar boy either.That's for sure. But I don't recall his problems involving his taxes.

wendersfan
09-09-08, 03:55 PM
That's for sure. But I don't recall his problems involving his taxes.No, he had more "earthy" problems. ;) It was just the first thing i thought of when I saw the thread title.

X
09-09-08, 03:56 PM
Strippers and booze... The thread would have to be "What's the problem with politicians?" to cover that.

classicman2
09-09-08, 04:28 PM
I'm a fan of Charlie Rangel.

But - I don't see how he can keep his committee chairmanship after this.

At the very minimum he has to step aside while the House Ethics Committee looks into the matter. And, I don't see how he can escape at least a censure by The House for this.

The Bus
09-09-08, 05:22 PM
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sam_Gibbons">Wikipedia seems to indicate</a> that Sam Gibbons could've been prosecuted under Godwin's Law for his remarks to the newly Republican congress in the mid 1990s.

Dr Mabuse
09-09-08, 05:41 PM
Wilbur Mills wasn't an altar boy either.

Don't even get me started on that son of a bitch Thaddeus Stevens.

creekdipper
09-10-08, 01:52 AM
Give Rangel a break. Do you really expect him to remember how many houses he owns?

wmansir
09-10-08, 04:08 AM
Rangel may have a horrible accountant, but he has a hell of a realtor.

crazyronin
09-10-08, 05:10 AM
Surely Rep Rangel has accountants that could have advised him on this dealing.

The letter explaining his tax ramifications got lost in one of his four rent controlled apartments.

grundle
09-14-08, 04:33 PM
Sarah Palin had members of her own party prosecuted for corruption.

Barack Obama is too wimpy to urge for Charles Rangel to be prosecuted for tax evasion.

Rangel is the chairman of the tax writing committee, and he didn't pay his taxes. He wrote the rules, but he didn't follow them.

Why is he still the chairman?

Why hasn't he been fired?

Here's why:


http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38879

There is simply no accountability for government employees. Once they have a job, it's practically a job for life. Almost no one ever gets fired from a federal government job. The statistics are staggering.

According to the Office of Personnel Management, only one in 5,000 non-defense workers get fired annually for poor performance.

From 1984 through 2001 – a period of 17 years – of 28,000 employees in the State Department, only six were fired for poor performance. Yet, I think we could safely eliminate the entire department and not lose a step as a nation.

Only one person was fired from the entire Education Department in 2001. Only two were fired in the entire Transportation Department that year. Only two were fired from the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

In all the federal bureaucracies combined in 2001, only 434 employees were fired – and that was higher than the annual average. That 434 figure represents a negligible 0.02 percent of all federal government employees.

Not only does it take heroic action by managers to fire federal employees, there are also hardly any incentives for good performance.

A study by OPM concluded that "the federal white-collar pay system sends and reinforces the message that performance does not matter."

Suprmallet
09-14-08, 05:10 PM
What that article doesn't take into account is that 98% of a government job consists of making sure you do nothing that could get you fired, which usually means just that: Doing nothing.

JasonF
09-14-08, 07:48 PM
What that article doesn't take into account is that 98% of a government job consists of making sure you do nothing that could get you fired, which usually means just that: Doing nothing.

:rolleyes: Next time I talk to my dad, I'll have to let him know that his job consists of doing nothing.

DVD Polizei
09-14-08, 07:56 PM
Not all government workers are like this. Just the ones who tend to speak the most. :)

X
09-15-08, 11:49 AM
Yes, just what you want from the guy in charge of writing the tax laws. Either they're too hard for him to follow and should spend his time on simplifying them or, more likely from some of the discrepancies, he's not the right person for the job.

More errors for Rangel; hires new accountant
By DEVLIN BARRETT – 8 hours ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — A new set of potential problems in Rep. Charles Rangel's financial papers has prompted the tax-writing lawmaker to hire a forensic accounting expert to try to unravel the mess.

Rangel, chairman of the powerful House Ways and Means Committee, is already the subject of ethics committee investigations on several fronts, including unreported income and unpaid taxes on his beach house in the Dominican Republic.

Those issues and others have led the New York Democrat to hire the expert to pore over Rangel's finances over the past 20 years, and issue a report to the House ethics committee.

Rangel's lawyer, Lanny Davis, said the hiring shows Rangel "has nothing to hide and does not believe he has done anything intentionally wrong."

The report will be given to the committee "as quickly as possible," Davis said, and the congressman will not get to see it before the committee.

The tax issue is particularly embarrassing for a lawmaker whose job is to guide new tax law. Rangel is resisting calls from Republicans that he should lose his committee post, among the most coveted on Capitol Hill.

As more questions have been raised about Rangel's records, his lawyers and accountants have uncovered new discrepancies in the personal financial disclosure documents that he files every year to Congress. Every lawmaker is required to file such paperwork disclosing major assets.

Rangel said in a statement he became aware of the issues over the weekend while working with his attorneys and staff. "While over the years I delegated to my staff the completion of my annual House financial disclosure statements, I had the ultimate responsibility. I owed my colleagues and the public adherence to a higher standard of care not only as a member of Congress but even more as the chair of the House Ways and Means Committee," he said.

Among the new discrepancies:

_Rangel's papers over the past 10 years show no reference to the sale of a home he once owned on Colorado Avenue in Washington.

_The details of a property bought in Sunny Isles, Fla., are bewildering at best. The stated value changes significantly from year to year, and even page to page, from $50,000 to $100,000 all the way up to $500,000.

_Some of the entries for investment funds fluctuate strangely, suggesting that the person either didn't have accurate information or didn't fill out the paperwork correctly.

Rangel spent the past week trying to answer questions about his ethics and his finances.

He admitted he owes the Internal Revenue Service about $5,000 in back taxes for unreported income from the rental of his vacation villa, and probably a smaller amount to state and city tax collectors.

The congressman acknowledged he made mistakes but said they were errors of omission and should not lead to the loss of his high position in Congress.

The home in the Dominican Republic has proven a major embarrassment to the 78-year-old Rangel, who conceded he never reported the rental income over a 20-year period, received a no-interest mortgage on the place for more than half that time and claims to have no idea what it is worth today.

The ethics committee is also investigating Rangel's rental of three rent-stabilized apartments in his home district of Harlem, as well as his use of official congressional stationery to try to find private donors for a college center named after the lawmaker.

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5ic3pl2QFR1PiP9bv3IIjVsyaSclgD9370P5O1

bhk
09-16-08, 04:10 PM
The Forensic Accountant's job will be to ethnically cleanse the criminal activity on Rangel's part.

And he's a dem and has the correct skin color so he's not even temporarily stepping down.

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/1153ap_rangel_ethics.html

classicman2
09-16-08, 04:13 PM
Serious question: If this had been a Republican Ways & Means Chairman, do you think we would have heard more about this from the media?

bhk
09-16-08, 04:18 PM
I think we've heard about it from the media. But if he was a republican, the media would have the premeditated criminal activity angle rather than trying to cover for him by portraying this as a minor oversight.

X
09-16-08, 04:18 PM
Serious question: If this had been a Republican Ways & Means Chairman, do you think we would have heard more about this from the media?I sure at least Nancy Pelosi would be screaming to the media that he should resign his chairmanship.

classicman2
09-16-08, 04:21 PM
I'll answer my own question - obviously, yes.

Venusian
09-16-08, 04:26 PM
supposedly pelosi has asked him to step down but he won't. her office denies asking him though

classicman2
09-16-08, 04:32 PM
I don't believe she has asked him. She can force the issue if he won't step down.

Pistol Pete
09-16-08, 04:54 PM
A study by OPM concluded that "the federal white-collar pay system sends and reinforces the message that performance does not matter."
This is absolutely true. The federal gov't is deathly afraid of being accused of racism, sexism, ageism, nepotism, etc. So in order to avoid any sort of preferential treatment, they remove practically all performance metrics that are subjective. About the only thing that matters is years of service.

classicman2
09-16-08, 06:37 PM
I've noticed something about Charlie. The last couple of days he doesn't seem to be his old, jovial self when being interviewed. ;)

classicman2
09-18-08, 08:37 AM
Well, even more problems for Charlie Rangel.

It seems as if he has $5,000+ illegal parking tickets he hasn't paid.

Pelosi said again - 'he will not resign.'

wendersfan
09-18-08, 09:35 AM
I didn't know who the next highest ranking Democrat on Ways and Means is. It's Fortney (Pete) Stark of California, a Unitarian-Universalist ( :banana: ) who according to wikipedia is the first and only openly atheist member of Congress ( :sad: ).

classicman2
09-18-08, 09:38 AM
Senority doesn't necessarily mean you get the job.

X
09-18-08, 11:05 AM
I didn't know who the next highest ranking Democrat on Ways and Means is. It's Fortney (Pete) Stark of California, a Unitarian-Universalist ( :banana: ) who according to wikipedia is the first and only openly atheist member of Congress ( :sad: ).Oh God. I can't even imagine the extent of what he could mess up! :eek:

But he's so out there that he probably couldn't get anything done. Even his own party couldn't go along with what he would want to do.

classicman2
09-18-08, 11:12 AM
If Rangel resigns from the committee, I believe Sander Levin would become the chairman.

Even though Stark is from CA, I don't believe he'll get the job.

X
09-18-08, 11:24 AM
Even though Stark is from CA, I don't believe he'll get the job.Yeah, Pelosi isn't crazy.

orangecrush18
09-18-08, 11:45 AM
I didn't know who the next highest ranking Democrat on Ways and Means is. It's Fortney (Pete) Stark of California, a Unitarian-Universalist ( :banana: ) who according to wikipedia is the first and only openly atheist member of Congress ( :sad: ).
You alow openly atheist people to be members. You are a progressive lot.

grundle
09-18-08, 12:46 PM
Well, even more problems for Charlie Rangel.

It seems as if he has $5,000+ illegal parking tickets he hasn't paid.

Pelosi said again - 'he will not resign.'


No, it's not about parking tickets. It's much more serious:


http://www.nypost.com/seven/09182008/news/regionalnews/big_wheel_benz_the_rules_129646.htm

BIG WHEEL BENZ THE RULES

RANGEL'S ILLEGAL FREE PARKING MAY BE NEW TAX WOE

By DAPHNE RETTER, Post Correspondent

September 18, 2008

WASHINGTON - Rep. Charles Rangel has been using a House of Representatives parking garage for years as free storage space for his old Mercedes-Benz - a violation of congressional rules and a potential new tax woe for the embattled lawmaker, The Post has learned.

The 1972 silver sedan is registered to Rangel, who is already under investigation by the House Ethics Committee, and is parked in a coveted section of an indoor lot, near elevators that lead to his office.

HURT: Weighty, Shady Pol Threat To Own Party

The car is covered with a protective tarp and has no license plates. Rangel's registration on the vehicle expired in 2004, state records show.

House rules forbid use of the garage for long-term storage more than 45 days - and congressional aides told The Post that Rangel's car has been sitting there for years.

Rangel today told The Post, "I told you I am not discussing that. I want to be kind and gentle -- please let me be." The veteran Harlem Democrat, who is chairman of the tax-writing Ways and Means Committee, is under fire for numerous lapses.

House Republicans were quick to criticize Rangel's latest gaffe.

"In a way, this latest revelation is symbolic of how Charlie Rangel and the Democrat-led Congress have chosen to conduct themselves. Rangel continues to openly thumb his nose at the law while remaining parked atop the most powerful committee in Congress. The 'most ethical congress in history' continues to embarrass itself," NRCC Press Secretary Ken Spain said in a statement.

Rangel has asked that the House ethics panel examine his possession of four rent-regulated apartments; his tax liability stemming from his ownership of a vacation home in the Dominican Republic; and his use of House stationery to solicit donations for a "center for public service" he is launching.

A House Web site on parking regulations informs anyone with a space that, under IRS regulations, the benefit of the free parking is considered "imputed income" and must be declared to the government.

The spaces are valued by the House at $290 per month, the site says - about the monthly cost of leasing a space in a private DC-area garage.

If the car has been in that space since its license plates were surrendered four years ago, the imputed income would be nearly $5,000.

In addition to the storage issue, the vehicle - valued at roughly $10,000 to $15,000 - runs afoul of other rules set forth on the House Web site because it does not have license plates and does not display a current House parking permit.

New York State Department of Motor Vehicles records show the Mercedes, along with several other cars, is registered to Rangel at his address on West 135th Street.

The records indicate that in 2002, the registration was valid and Rangel had special Congress-issued license plates with the number 15.

His registration was suspended on the vehicle in October 2004 because it did not have valid insurance coverage, state records show. Rangel voluntarily surrendered his plates that year.

In addition to a late-model Cadillac DeVille that Rangel leases and the Mercedes in the House garage, state records show he also owns a 1989 Mercedes-Benz convertible, a 2001 Chrysler and a 1993 Ford.

Rangel's woes first began last year, when The Post reported that he wanted permission from the Federal Election Commission to use $64,500 from his "leadership" political-action committee and campaign account to commission an elaborate portrait of himself to hang in the Ways and Means Committee room.

This summer, Rangel was hit with a series of wallops about his ethics.

It was revealed that he had four rent-stabilized apartments in Harlem, including one he had been using as a campaign office. He has since agreed to give up that office.

He was then hit with a flood of questions after The Post reported that he had failed to disclose in his federal filings income that he'd earned from renting out the luxury villa in the Dominican Republic, which he has owned for 20 years.

He was forced to admit that he never paid taxes on $75,000 in rental income he'd received on the property over 20 years.

He has also admitted his past two decades' worth of returns were riddled with errors, and has hired a forensic accountant to examine them.

classicman2
09-18-08, 12:59 PM
The parking thing isn't going to cost Rangel the chairmanshp.

It's the tax thing that might bring him down.

Sean O'Hara
09-19-08, 11:50 PM
More trouble for Charlie (http://wcbstv.com/politics/congressman.charles.rangel.2.821541.html) -- this time he's made Palin's shit list, and pissed off the disabled.

NEW YORK (CBS) ― Already under fire for his tax troubles, Manhattan Congressman Charles Rangel really put his foot in his mouth on Friday.

In a CBS 2 HD exclusive interview, Rep. Rangel called Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin "disabled."

The question was simple: Why are the Democrats so afraid of Palin and her popularity?

The answer was astonishing.

"You got to be kind to the disabled," Rangel said.

That's right. The chairman of the powerful House Ways & Means Committee called Palin disabled -- even when CBS 2 HD called him on it.

CBS 2 HD: "You got to be kind to the disabled?"

Rangel: "Yes."

CBS 2 HD: "She's disabled?"

Rangel: "There's no question about it politically. It's a nightmare to think that a person's foreign policy is based on their ability to look at Russia from where they live."

Later Friday, Rangel issued a statement saying "disabled" wasn't the word he meant to use.

"Governor Palin is an obviously healthy person who in no way fits the description of disabled. I meant to say then, and I am saying now, that she entered the campaign with a disadvantage in the area of foreign policy," Rangel said in a statement.

"Any inference that my words were in any connected to her son, Trig, who was born with Down syndrome, is a real stretch -- and, I would have to think -- a way to make political points out of my poor choice of words," he added.

Republicans think Rangel's comments are insulting as well as shocking.

"Charlie Rangel's comments are clearly disgraceful," Rep. Peter King, R-Long Island, said. "This is just another liberal Democrat who can't accept an independent woman running for president."

King, who is co-chair of the McCain-Palin campaign in New York, watched Rangel's comments with CBS 2 HD. He was particularly upset because Palin's 4-month-old son, Trig, is disabled. He has Down syndrome.

"We should be sensitive to her or any woman who has a child or family member who has any affliction at all," King said. "And so to use the word disabled in the context of a female candidate for vice president who has a child who is disabled really is wrong. Charlie owes her and the entire disabled community and apology."

Advocates for the disabled are also upset.

"It makes me feel as if he's trying to put her down, trying to say she's not good for the presidency or the vice presidency," said Michael Imperiale of Disabled In Action Of Metropolitan N.Y.

"A disabled president ran this country. He was disabled. His name was Roosevelt."

A spokesman for the McCain-Palin campaign also piled on, saying that this kind of rhetoric has no place in politics.

Ever notice that when a politician loses the Touch, they lose it all at once?

bhk
09-20-08, 01:07 PM
I think he meant "beautiful". But, because he's a dem, there will be no media feeding frenzy.

classicman2
09-20-08, 01:30 PM
Charlie can be thankful for one thing - the congress' attention is on other matters.