View Poll Results: Does anyone prefer DVD video quality over Blu Ray video quality?
Yes, I prefer DVD video quality over Blu Ray video quality
31
13.78%
No, I prefer Blu Ray video quality over DVD video quality
173
76.89%
I like both equally.
21
9.33%
Voters: 225. You may not vote on this poll
Does anyone prefer DVD video quality over Blu Ray video quality?
#1
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Does anyone prefer DVD video quality over Blu Ray video quality?
Some people like the video quality of a Sony HDTV over a Panasonic HDTV. And vice versa. It doesn't mean that one has better video quality than the other. It's all about which one your eyes prefer.
So, I'm curious, I'm not asking about which technology is better - DVD or Blu Ray - I'm just asking which video quality do you prefer to watch?
I personally prefer DVD over Blu Ray, because:
1. I don't have a mega-sized tv (just 37 inches), in which Blu Ray has video quality advantage over DVD for when TV/projector screens are much bigger.
2. The Blu Ray video quality of new movies are just too bright, too crisp. It's like trying on prescription glasses which are too strong. I don't want backgrounds to be as crystal clear as foregrounds - that's not the way eyes work. I can't really comment on old movies released on Blu Ray because I haven't seen any when they play the Blu Rays in the electronics stores, but I have a feeling that older movies released on Blu Ray is something that I would prefer.
3. Blu Ray is also headache-inducing. I was watching the Transformers Blu Ray in an electronics store and the brightness/crispness/sharpness factor just hurt my head. Furthermore, CGI seems to be even more fake/obvious on Blu Ray over DVD.
Blu Ray is still pretty amazing - almost 3D-like, but i'm not interesting in watching a 3D movie everytime I watch a movie. I just want the same video quality as I see in the movie theaters, instead of something so drastically different.
So, I'm curious, I'm not asking about which technology is better - DVD or Blu Ray - I'm just asking which video quality do you prefer to watch?
I personally prefer DVD over Blu Ray, because:
1. I don't have a mega-sized tv (just 37 inches), in which Blu Ray has video quality advantage over DVD for when TV/projector screens are much bigger.
2. The Blu Ray video quality of new movies are just too bright, too crisp. It's like trying on prescription glasses which are too strong. I don't want backgrounds to be as crystal clear as foregrounds - that's not the way eyes work. I can't really comment on old movies released on Blu Ray because I haven't seen any when they play the Blu Rays in the electronics stores, but I have a feeling that older movies released on Blu Ray is something that I would prefer.
3. Blu Ray is also headache-inducing. I was watching the Transformers Blu Ray in an electronics store and the brightness/crispness/sharpness factor just hurt my head. Furthermore, CGI seems to be even more fake/obvious on Blu Ray over DVD.
Blu Ray is still pretty amazing - almost 3D-like, but i'm not interesting in watching a 3D movie everytime I watch a movie. I just want the same video quality as I see in the movie theaters, instead of something so drastically different.
Last edited by toddly6666; 09-05-08 at 12:39 PM.
#2
DVD Talk Legend
If you have the right set up, and the initial transfer is done right on the BD, then I'd go with that.
Watching a Blu-ray on a 19in tube set wouldn't mean shit. I think it all depends on your setup.
Watching a Blu-ray on a 19in tube set wouldn't mean shit. I think it all depends on your setup.
#5
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
I agree that bad F/X show up more in Blu-Ray, but the same was true in DVD over VHS. I don't remember ever seeing the strings waving the Queen's tail in the movie Aliens until I had it on DVD.
I voted that I like both equally. Blu-Ray is obviously superior, but I'm not one of the people that refuses to buy anything that's not Blu. Personally, I think that's just silly. I will buy a new release in Blu, but if it's not available I still buy and enjoy regular DVD's.
I voted that I like both equally. Blu-Ray is obviously superior, but I'm not one of the people that refuses to buy anything that's not Blu. Personally, I think that's just silly. I will buy a new release in Blu, but if it's not available I still buy and enjoy regular DVD's.
#6
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Electronic store setups are not to be judged on quality, because they intentionally have the brightness and contrast turned up much higher than normal to make the TVs stand out more. In the display menu, it's the 'daylight' setting or some similar name, also referred to as 'torch mode'. No one would watch any kind of TV like that at home unless they didn't know how to set it up properly.
#8
DVD Talk Limited Edition
It's not so much that I prefer DVD's video quality, it's just that I don't care about Blu-Ray's video quality.
Last edited by dadaluholla; 09-05-08 at 03:00 PM.
#9
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain
Posts: 20,085
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Honestly, it all hinges on the transfer. I've seen HD content that looked about as good as an SD upconverted. I've also seen HD content that blows the SD out of the water. Just because something is on BR doesn't mean it looks better than SD; there are many variables you have to factor in to determine if the picture is truly better.
#11
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#12
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: knoxville, tn
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#13
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I certainly haven't seen enough comparisons to be anything resembling an expert, but we do have a display showing Spider-Man 3 in standard and Blu-Ray. While the image quality of the Blu-Ray is noticeably much sharper (and probably preferable when comparing it directly to standard DVD), it struck me as almost too good. Like I wasn't watching a movie, but a BBC version of it. It definitely bothered me and I would probably want to avoid watching movies like that on Blu-Ray. Not sure if the standard was upconverted or not, but somewhere in the middle would be better, personally. I don't remember that effect when we had Harry Potter And The Goblet Of Fire playing side by side, so it might just be that particular movie.
I'm not even remotely ready to upgrade, and I can live with that. I still only have a regular 4X3 television, although I do plan to upgrade eventually.
K
I'm not even remotely ready to upgrade, and I can live with that. I still only have a regular 4X3 television, although I do plan to upgrade eventually.
K
#14
DVD Talk Legend
I don't understand the comments about brightness, unless you're referring to the in-store displays in torch mode. If you're referring to the smoothness of the frame rate, it seems this is yet another case of someone thinking the motion interpolation is caused by the format rather than the TV.
#15
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Socal
Posts: 4,137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Honestly it depends on the movie. Like 80 horror movies and stuff I kinda like the low-grade grainy quality. Thats why I've kept a lot of old VHS's despite owning the DVDs.
#16
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Just because something is on a Blu-Ray disc doesn't automatically mean it's better video quality than the same thing on DVD. You could have the same exact thing on Blu-Ray that's on DVD and the only thing different is the extra space on the disc.
As long as everything is improved, I'll go with Blu-Ray.
As long as everything is improved, I'll go with Blu-Ray.
#17
I certainly haven't seen enough comparisons to be anything resembling an expert, but we do have a display showing Spider-Man 3 in standard and Blu-Ray. While the image quality of the Blu-Ray is noticeably much sharper (and probably preferable when comparing it directly to standard DVD), it struck me as almost too good. Like I wasn't watching a movie, but a BBC version of it.
I think it makes sports games look better or something.
#18
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I'm still waiting to see a jaw-dropping hi-def demonstration (either BD, broadcast or even poor departed HD DVD). I've checked the displays in stores, from the big boxes HT rooms to the WalMart displays and I've never seen something that would make me dump my 32" SD Sony tube.
I want to believe, I really do! I just haven't seen anything that looks remarkably better than a DVD (or even a good SD broadcast) on my 4:3 tube.
Don't ask me why -- I see the numbers and I've worked with computers and graphics all my life (though maybe that's why) -- but I just don't see what all the hoopla is about.
Also, I just don't trust those "side-by-side" comparisons I see in the store. The DVD version always looks so washed out and blurry that I can't help but think that I'm seeing some sales trickery as they never look that poor at home - although I know that non-upscaled DVDs can look worse on a hi-def TV.
I want to believe!
I want to believe, I really do! I just haven't seen anything that looks remarkably better than a DVD (or even a good SD broadcast) on my 4:3 tube.
Don't ask me why -- I see the numbers and I've worked with computers and graphics all my life (though maybe that's why) -- but I just don't see what all the hoopla is about.
Also, I just don't trust those "side-by-side" comparisons I see in the store. The DVD version always looks so washed out and blurry that I can't help but think that I'm seeing some sales trickery as they never look that poor at home - although I know that non-upscaled DVDs can look worse on a hi-def TV.
I want to believe!
#19
DVD Talk Legend
#22
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: NJ, the place where smiles go to die
Posts: 7,393
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I want the best possible, transfer of a film, especially on older films, I watched the Sand Pebbles last night, an older film that is just night & day compared to the DVD transfer. So how on earth could someone prefer the DVD quality over the Blu.
Yes, there are definitely Blus released so far, that for whatever dissapointing reason, have dissapointing transfers (Patriot Games IMO), so I can understand maybe on those preferring the SD & I agree there are still a TON of movies I own that I don't feel the need to upgrade (films like Val Lewton films an example I'm perfectly fine in SD). But I'll still take the audio upgrade over a SD any day of the week also.
I really think for the most part, anyone that prefers a DVD over a Blu quality wise, just doesn't have the proper set-up.
#23
DVD Talk Legend
I personally prefer DVD over Blu Ray, because:
1. I don't have a mega-sized tv (just 37 inches), in which Blu Ray has video quality advantage over DVD for when TV/projector screens are much bigger.
1. I don't have a mega-sized tv (just 37 inches), in which Blu Ray has video quality advantage over DVD for when TV/projector screens are much bigger.
2. The Blu Ray video quality of new movies are just too bright, too crisp. It's like trying on prescription glasses which are too strong. I don't want backgrounds to be as crystal clear as foregrounds - that's not the way eyes work.
However, Blu-ray does not magically change the sharpness of the background of the picture in comparison with the foregrond.
3. Blu Ray is also headache-inducing. I was watching the Transformers Blu Ray in an electronics store and the brightness/crispness/sharpness factor just hurt my head. Furthermore, CGI seems to be even more fake/obvious on Blu Ray over DVD.
I just want the same video quality as I see in the movie theaters, instead of something so drastically different.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well, i'm using my 50" panasonic plasma and during the last fall season i watched "heroes" in HD every week. having not converted to blu-ray (yet), i purchased the SD version of the dvd and watched it on my upconverting player. now i could obviously see the difference between what i was watching on dvd versus what i had seen in HD, but i wasn't disappointed and i didn't feel the need/urge to jump to blu-ray. the picture quality was really good, and while the sharpness and colors on HD were better, i don't know if they were worth the ~$10 price difference to buy a new release blu-ray for a movie, and ~$20+ for a tv show.
and i know comparing blu-ray to an HD source is probably not the best thing, since the HD source isn't 1080p, and i can see how big-budgets, special-effects-driven blockbusters would probably benefit from HD, but considering most of what i watch is television shows and then comedies/dramas, i don't really have too much of an interest in jumping over.
and i know comparing blu-ray to an HD source is probably not the best thing, since the HD source isn't 1080p, and i can see how big-budgets, special-effects-driven blockbusters would probably benefit from HD, but considering most of what i watch is television shows and then comedies/dramas, i don't really have too much of an interest in jumping over.