I Know Who Killed Me - anyone see it?
#1
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Thread Starter
I Know Who Killed Me - anyone see it?
The trailer is pretty f'ing cool. Seems like an American giallo or something with echoes of "The Double Life of Veronique". This looks like the movie that "Captivity" wanted to be but failed miserably at.
I know Lindsay Lowhan has been taking a lot of the shots in the media lately, but damn that girl sure can act.
<embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/oljhxhR6_S4" ></embed>
I know Lindsay Lowhan has been taking a lot of the shots in the media lately, but damn that girl sure can act.
<embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/oljhxhR6_S4" ></embed>
#2
DVD Talk Hero
This movie is getting slammed harder than a porn star.
#7
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Another positive review from Bloody-Disgusting:
I guess I don't need to spoiler the review because if you're in a thread about "have you seen it?" then there's obviously going to be some discussion about the film itself.
I was going to begin this review with a haughty diatribe about the whirlwind of media frenzy which is Lindsay Lohan, and her continual issues with drugs/alcohol/DUI’s/rehab/on-set bitchiness, but frankly, that’s a sorry cop-out. It’s unnecessary filler. And it’s irrelevant to the movie itself.
So, I’ll instead begin by saying that I Know Who Killed Me is a more-than-pleasant surprise, well-filmed, well-acted, especially by (gasp) Lohan herself, and a surprisingly intriguing and gruesome little thriller. The film is directed by Chris Sivertson, hot on the tail of his first feature, The Lost (adapted from a Jack Ketchum novel of the same name), and is a definite sign of great directorial things to come.
Lohan stars as Aubrey Fleming, a high school kid who excels at writing and piano. On the night of the big football game, Aubrey goes missing and is presumed to have been abducted. Seems there are a number of young females in the area turning up as corpses with mutilated arms and legs. The killer’s M.O. is compromised, however, when a passer-by finds Aubrey hacked to pieces in a ditch, but very much alive. When she awakes, short a few limbs, she remembers nothing of the incident, and most terrifying of all, has sunk into a strange amnesia with no recollection of anyone with the name Aubrey. She claims she is someone else with an entirely different past. Could it be post-traumatic disorder, or something far most sinister at work?
I Know Who Killed Me will unfortunately live or die with the Lohan stigma – some will avoid it, some will flock to it (13 year old girls, anyone?). I call this the ‘Tom Cruise Syndrome.’ But truth be told, she clocks in a fine, and often times complex, performance. She is, without a doubt in my mind, a great actress. And here she is immersed in some racy and gruesome material that I applaud her for taking on.
There is a complexity to the movie, in the actual film-making itself, which I found I was thinking about long after I left the theatre. The killer’s motives are hinted at throughout, for instance, in various subtle shots and scenes. This is especially true with the mutilation of the victims. Quite ingenious, frankly. The use of two primary colors – blue and red – aren’t merely stylistic choices, but hint at deeper significance. Also, in a welcome turn of events, the ‘twist’ isn’t a revelatory ending, but rather unveiled about ľ of the way in, which leaves Sivertson with a truly nail-biting conclusion that doesn’t rely on hare-brained leaps of faith. I was riveted until the very end. And, perhaps most importantly (and as mentioned earlier), the more I got thinking about it afterward, the more things clicked into place. A movie that stays with you after the screening is an effective one indeed.
If I have some gripes, they are minor. Some of the acting in the initial sequences is wooden, including a couple of plot exposition scenes with Lohan that stand out like a sore thumb. Also, the first act of the film seems…rushed, for lack of a better term. Each scene is a short spurt of information, like the film wants to sit down and tell us more, but doesn’t have the time. So, instead, it rushes things a little too much. And finally, in the second act, things get pretty slow-paced, putting the tension on the back-burner in order to deepen the story.
A couple wonderful stand-outs, though: Sivertson often leaves things in our, the viewers, hands. Lengthy explanations are not needed; he lets us fill in the blanks. I can’t tell you how refreshing that is from the horror genre (especially the serial killer sub-genre). As well, there are a number of ingenious scares and he does not let up on the gore or disturbing images when they are needed. Woah, I mean, some scenes are truly stomach-churning.
This is a very good film from a promising director. Some may find the crux of the story hard to digest, but I truly do not find it affected my enjoyment of the film. It’s scary when it wants to be, gruesome when the time comes, and the work of a director who not only knows the genre, but respects his audience. High recommendations, despite what I felt walking into the theatre.
Oh, and as a final note – this movie has a little of everything for those with any opinion on Lindsay Lohan. For those who hate her, you’ll no doubt revel in the icky torture scenes. For everyone else (myself definitely included), there are some surprisingly sexy and steamy strip scenes. Which never hurt my opinion on a horror film before, that’s for certain. Heh.
I guess I don't need to spoiler the review because if you're in a thread about "have you seen it?" then there's obviously going to be some discussion about the film itself.
I was going to begin this review with a haughty diatribe about the whirlwind of media frenzy which is Lindsay Lohan, and her continual issues with drugs/alcohol/DUI’s/rehab/on-set bitchiness, but frankly, that’s a sorry cop-out. It’s unnecessary filler. And it’s irrelevant to the movie itself.
So, I’ll instead begin by saying that I Know Who Killed Me is a more-than-pleasant surprise, well-filmed, well-acted, especially by (gasp) Lohan herself, and a surprisingly intriguing and gruesome little thriller. The film is directed by Chris Sivertson, hot on the tail of his first feature, The Lost (adapted from a Jack Ketchum novel of the same name), and is a definite sign of great directorial things to come.
Lohan stars as Aubrey Fleming, a high school kid who excels at writing and piano. On the night of the big football game, Aubrey goes missing and is presumed to have been abducted. Seems there are a number of young females in the area turning up as corpses with mutilated arms and legs. The killer’s M.O. is compromised, however, when a passer-by finds Aubrey hacked to pieces in a ditch, but very much alive. When she awakes, short a few limbs, she remembers nothing of the incident, and most terrifying of all, has sunk into a strange amnesia with no recollection of anyone with the name Aubrey. She claims she is someone else with an entirely different past. Could it be post-traumatic disorder, or something far most sinister at work?
I Know Who Killed Me will unfortunately live or die with the Lohan stigma – some will avoid it, some will flock to it (13 year old girls, anyone?). I call this the ‘Tom Cruise Syndrome.’ But truth be told, she clocks in a fine, and often times complex, performance. She is, without a doubt in my mind, a great actress. And here she is immersed in some racy and gruesome material that I applaud her for taking on.
There is a complexity to the movie, in the actual film-making itself, which I found I was thinking about long after I left the theatre. The killer’s motives are hinted at throughout, for instance, in various subtle shots and scenes. This is especially true with the mutilation of the victims. Quite ingenious, frankly. The use of two primary colors – blue and red – aren’t merely stylistic choices, but hint at deeper significance. Also, in a welcome turn of events, the ‘twist’ isn’t a revelatory ending, but rather unveiled about ľ of the way in, which leaves Sivertson with a truly nail-biting conclusion that doesn’t rely on hare-brained leaps of faith. I was riveted until the very end. And, perhaps most importantly (and as mentioned earlier), the more I got thinking about it afterward, the more things clicked into place. A movie that stays with you after the screening is an effective one indeed.
If I have some gripes, they are minor. Some of the acting in the initial sequences is wooden, including a couple of plot exposition scenes with Lohan that stand out like a sore thumb. Also, the first act of the film seems…rushed, for lack of a better term. Each scene is a short spurt of information, like the film wants to sit down and tell us more, but doesn’t have the time. So, instead, it rushes things a little too much. And finally, in the second act, things get pretty slow-paced, putting the tension on the back-burner in order to deepen the story.
A couple wonderful stand-outs, though: Sivertson often leaves things in our, the viewers, hands. Lengthy explanations are not needed; he lets us fill in the blanks. I can’t tell you how refreshing that is from the horror genre (especially the serial killer sub-genre). As well, there are a number of ingenious scares and he does not let up on the gore or disturbing images when they are needed. Woah, I mean, some scenes are truly stomach-churning.
This is a very good film from a promising director. Some may find the crux of the story hard to digest, but I truly do not find it affected my enjoyment of the film. It’s scary when it wants to be, gruesome when the time comes, and the work of a director who not only knows the genre, but respects his audience. High recommendations, despite what I felt walking into the theatre.
Oh, and as a final note – this movie has a little of everything for those with any opinion on Lindsay Lohan. For those who hate her, you’ll no doubt revel in the icky torture scenes. For everyone else (myself definitely included), there are some surprisingly sexy and steamy strip scenes. Which never hurt my opinion on a horror film before, that’s for certain. Heh.
#8
Senior Member
Originally Posted by Brian Orndorf
I think Bloody-Disgusting forgot to take their meds.
Does the film have any merit? Were there any memorable moments? Is it good for scares? Is it good in that "Mommie Dearest" sort of way? How were the performances? What didn't you like about it?
You're giving us nothing here.
------------------
This film is getting beat hard by critics. Although, there could be extra knocking due to Lindsey Lohan's caricaturable self-presentation lately. People tend to love a circus act and feed off it: Ms. Lohan is the star of the month. That's not saying that the film is good, however. It probably is pretty bad.
I haven't seen it.
Last edited by AllHallowsEve; 07-27-07 at 08:41 PM.
#9
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bellefontaine, Ohio
Posts: 5,628
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by AllHallowsEve
Well, you obviously saw it... What did you think of the film? You mention meds: why are they needed for the film's viewing?
Does the film have any merit? Were there any memorable moments? Is it good for scares? Is it good in that "Mommie Dearest" sort of way? How were the performances? What didn't you like about it?
You're giving us nothing here.
------------------
Does the film have any merit? Were there any memorable moments? Is it good for scares? Is it good in that "Mommie Dearest" sort of way? How were the performances? What didn't you like about it?
You're giving us nothing here.
------------------
Dude sometimes you dont need to see a movie to know that it is indeed beyond a shadow of a doubt 100% pure shit.
#10
DVD Talk Legend
I'll probably see it once it goes to the cheap theaters (which won't be long).
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I saw the movie today.
Absolutely disgusting. Poorly written, badly acted, ineptly edited, badly photographed, with some special effects imagery that borders on the comical, plus an amazing amount of gore. This movie would be funny in a so-bad-it's-good kind of way if it were not for the graphic violence with borders on the repulsive. How this film got an R rating, I will never know. Rob Zombie and Eli Roth make equally grisly movies, but they have a sense of creepy humor and style, this film has none.
Lindsay Lohan is a lock for the Worst Actress Razzie award and this film is a heavy favorite for Worst Film. Her career may never recover from this. Anyone who thinks that this movie has any subtlety or psychological depth to it probably thinks the same thing of a box of Cheerios.
The film goes beyond stupid, beyond grotesque, and some of the actors are amazingly inept. Even if Lindsay hadn't been involved with the law, this film would have haunted her resume for a long time. As it is, it could be a career breaker. At least it explains why she's been trying to drink herself into oblivion the last few weeks.
Absolutely disgusting. Poorly written, badly acted, ineptly edited, badly photographed, with some special effects imagery that borders on the comical, plus an amazing amount of gore. This movie would be funny in a so-bad-it's-good kind of way if it were not for the graphic violence with borders on the repulsive. How this film got an R rating, I will never know. Rob Zombie and Eli Roth make equally grisly movies, but they have a sense of creepy humor and style, this film has none.
Lindsay Lohan is a lock for the Worst Actress Razzie award and this film is a heavy favorite for Worst Film. Her career may never recover from this. Anyone who thinks that this movie has any subtlety or psychological depth to it probably thinks the same thing of a box of Cheerios.
Spoiler:
The film goes beyond stupid, beyond grotesque, and some of the actors are amazingly inept. Even if Lindsay hadn't been involved with the law, this film would have haunted her resume for a long time. As it is, it could be a career breaker. At least it explains why she's been trying to drink herself into oblivion the last few weeks.
#13
Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#15
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
I'm all in for a bad horror movie but I refuse to see any movie starring Lindsay Lohan. Her personal troubles aside, shes still a god awful actor & I don't know why anyone would want to see her in a movie.
I did sit see Freaky Friday & thank god Mark Harmon & Jamie Lee Curtis were in the movie to at least make up for Lohans shitty acting. Mean Girls was on TBS awhile ago (would never buy that shit on DVD) & I turned the channel after 5 minutes.
Like I said I'm all in for a horrible horror movie but if Lindsay Lohans in it, I wont even pick it up on DVD when it comes out. Is it just me or do all horror movies starring big name celebrities suck as of late?
I did sit see Freaky Friday & thank god Mark Harmon & Jamie Lee Curtis were in the movie to at least make up for Lohans shitty acting. Mean Girls was on TBS awhile ago (would never buy that shit on DVD) & I turned the channel after 5 minutes.
Like I said I'm all in for a horrible horror movie but if Lindsay Lohans in it, I wont even pick it up on DVD when it comes out. Is it just me or do all horror movies starring big name celebrities suck as of late?
#16
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by AllHallowsEve
Well, you obviously saw it... What did you think of the film? You mention meds: why are they needed for the film's viewing?
He was just playing around, man. I know the internet is serious business, but Orndorf was joking.
Just check the theatrical review section more often.
#17
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
oh, and the film is a lock for one of the worst pictures of the year.
Fangoria and Bloody-Dusgusting have a rep about trading "positive" reviews for studio access. I wouldn't trust anything they write.
Fangoria and Bloody-Dusgusting have a rep about trading "positive" reviews for studio access. I wouldn't trust anything they write.
#22
DVD Talk Hero
Julia Ormond is in this? How does her obligatory love triangle fit into the story?
#24
Challenge Guru & Comic Nerd
Awful. Was going to put effort into explaining why, but the film is not worth wasting another second of my life. After hitting the "post quick reply" button, I hope to erase all memory of those two hours of my life.
#25
DVD Talk Legend
This was just bizarre. There were times when I thought maybe a good movie could have been salvaged from pieces of this, but all in all this was just awful, albeit in a comically bad way. I had no choioce but to laugh out loud at certain scenes...
Spoiler: