Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > DVD Talk
Reload this Page >

Should all actors get profits from DVD sales?

DVD Talk Talk about DVDs and Movies on DVD including Covers and Cases

Should all actors get profits from DVD sales?

Old 06-25-07, 11:59 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: In the mouth of madness.
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Should all actors get profits from DVD sales?

I just read in Entertainment Weekly that there are looming strikes with the Writers, Actors, and Director's Guilds. Writers' contract ends in October with Actors and Director's in June 2008.

The main issue is them seeing more money from DVD sales and internet downloads.

With some actors (actresses) salaries already overwhelming amounts, do you think these same actors with the $10-20 million pay checks and back-end of gross movie reciepts (and some get DVD sales profits already) also see DVD profits?

I can see struggling actors who make an independent movie and then see a DVD become a cult and thus modest hit benefitting tremendously and would then hate to bias highly paid actors, but some of them make huge amounts already.
Old 06-25-07, 12:06 PM
  #2  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Shannon Nutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 18,352
Received 323 Likes on 241 Posts
This is a complicated issue with a lot of variables, but the short answer is yes - actors should get residuals on DVD sales.
Old 06-25-07, 12:10 PM
  #3  
DVD Talk Legend
 
islandclaws's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain
Posts: 20,085
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
I also agree. Studios make a ton of money off of these people and, even though they also are swimming in dough, they made the film and are entitled to a % of the DVD sales.
Old 06-25-07, 12:12 PM
  #4  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Rosemount, MN
Posts: 43,214
Received 1,606 Likes on 1,005 Posts
Considering that the draw of a any film is most likely an actor, a director or a writer over a film studio, then yes, they should get paid a fair amount.
Old 06-25-07, 12:15 PM
  #5  
Moderator
 
Groucho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 71,383
Received 122 Likes on 84 Posts
Joe Sixpack buys DVDs based on the guy whose face is on the box before most other factors, so yes.
Old 06-25-07, 12:19 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yes. And if it happens we may see a price increase on the DVD's we buy so inexpensively now, but Yes.
Old 06-25-07, 12:21 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think it's insane - when people get millions for the role and then even more millions of % from screenings. You think it's necessary to add some DVD sales %? Look at the stars now - they won't move their finger for a salary if it's not 7 figures or sometimes even 8. I think that corrupts. Same thing with sportsmen. Independent fimmakers is a different strory. But it's all a matter of contracts etc. Anyway I think it should be either one or another. Get % or your instant millions.
Old 06-25-07, 12:25 PM
  #8  
DVD Talk God
 
DJariya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: La Palma, CA
Posts: 78,664
Received 3,543 Likes on 2,539 Posts
If it means preventing a work stoppage, then yes.
Old 06-25-07, 12:26 PM
  #9  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
dadaluholla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wilmington, OH
Posts: 5,491
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
No. They're getting too much money as it is.
Old 06-25-07, 12:29 PM
  #10  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 3,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The $ has to go somewhere, why should the studio get all of it?

The actors get compensated for theatre revenue, why should they not be compensated for home video revenue?

YES, actors should get a % of the profits.
Old 06-25-07, 12:33 PM
  #11  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: MN
Posts: 23,936
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Not automatically.
Old 06-25-07, 12:35 PM
  #12  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,413
Received 38 Likes on 28 Posts
If the studio wants the actor or creative team that bad, they should be willing to pony up the %. Although I think it makes more sense for the creative team to get a % since it would be like them getting money after they have proven their worth whereas the studio probably has a better idea of how useful the actor is upfront.
Old 06-25-07, 12:36 PM
  #13  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Bandit03's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ormond Beach, Florida
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, alot of movies are bought mainly based on the fact that a particular actor/actress is in the movie. They should be compensated for their name selling a particular movie.
Old 06-25-07, 12:36 PM
  #14  
Moderator
 
nemein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: 1bit away from total disaster
Posts: 34,196
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Leave it up to the individual studios/actors/contracts. I don't think a blanket yes/no answer is really needed in this situation.
Old 06-25-07, 12:45 PM
  #15  
DVD Talk Reviewer & TOAT Winner
 
Alan Smithee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: USA
Posts: 10,420
Received 328 Likes on 247 Posts
If they do, I won't buy any more Ashton Kutcher movies.
Old 06-25-07, 12:52 PM
  #16  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Rampaging across DVDTalk.
Posts: 4,046
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Very few actors get multi million dollar paychecks so yes, yes they should.
Old 06-25-07, 01:01 PM
  #17  
PPP
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Alan Smithee
If they do, I won't buy any more Ashton Kutcher movies.
LOL!
Old 06-25-07, 01:01 PM
  #18  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
BuckNaked2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hartford, CT
Posts: 6,145
Received 33 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by ShaunoftheDead
I just read in Entertainment Weekly that there are looming strikes with the Writers, Actors, and Director's Guilds.......
WHAT??? So we won't see any more of the stellar films being released these days? No Oceans 14?....No Shreck the 4th??....No Pirates of the Carribean 7???....No Spider Man 9????....Say it ain't so!
Old 06-25-07, 01:06 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: In the mouth of madness.
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BuckNaked2k
WHAT??? So we won't see any more of the stellar films being released these days? No Oceans 14?....No Shreck the 4th??....No Pirates of the Carribean 7???....No Spider Man 9????....Say it ain't so!
I don't know about that, but they did mention that studios are rushing production schedules for the June 2008 deadline.
Old 06-25-07, 01:19 PM
  #20  
DVD Talk Legend
 
DeputyDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 14,080
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
There should be some sort of formula for fuguring out an actor's pay for DVD sales. The ratio of head size on the DVD cover should directly relate to the actor's paycheck.
Old 06-25-07, 01:28 PM
  #21  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Jaymole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: N.Y, N.Y
Posts: 10,515
Received 441 Likes on 249 Posts
Considering that the vast majority of actors don't receive million dollar paychecks, yes.
Old 06-25-07, 01:37 PM
  #22  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
BuckNaked2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hartford, CT
Posts: 6,145
Received 33 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by Jaymole
Considering that the vast majority of actors don't receive million dollar paychecks, yes.
I don't get a million dollar paycheck from my employer. Should I get a cut of every insurance policy they sell?
Old 06-25-07, 01:53 PM
  #23  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You people need to think about what you are saying. These actors work for what their contracts state. You keep saying that they should get paid because people buy movies that they are in and you are right about that, but they are getting paid its called their salary. Are you saying that they are under-paid? Well maybe some are but it is their choice to work for their CONTRACTED amount. Why should a studio pay them more money just because a movie they are in becomes a hit? I can assure you that they will get offered more to make a sequel of the hit so they will be compensated. As to all of the money that the studios are making and why they shouldn't be allowed to keep it (according to some of you). You have to remember that the studios are the ones taking the risks. To them, it is really just like the stock market, they are investing in a project (stock) and if the project pays off, they get the dividend. If the project tanks, the actors still get paid for their work but the studio loses money.

How about this, for those of you that think the actors should get more money because of DVD sales, should they have to pay the studios back if the movie tanks? I mean, lets be fair here.
Old 06-25-07, 02:14 PM
  #24  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,679
Received 645 Likes on 445 Posts
Originally Posted by MScottM
You people need to think about what you are saying. These actors work for what their contracts state.... Are you saying that they are under-paid? Well maybe some are but it is their choice to work for their CONTRACTED amount.
While it's true that actors should get paid what they were contracted for, it's equally true that actors have a right to negotiate that contract. However, the vast majority of actors don't have the weight to influence studios themselves, thus why they banded together to form a guild, which represents their interests. Lots of actors don't get paid any more than what the standard guild rates are, so if the majority of members of the guild think they they deserve a bit of DVD and internet revenue, just as they already get a bit of TV and VHS revenue, then the guild has every right to negotiate for that.

A lot of people are missing the point by talking about movie stars in this thread. Movie stars typically aren't affected by the guild rates; they negotiate for salaries and profit sharing far in excess of the guild minimums. Even if SAG gets everything they want from these negotiations, it's doubtful an actor like Tom Cruise will see a dime more from his next film than he would've gotten anyway.
Old 06-25-07, 02:20 PM
  #25  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,679
Received 645 Likes on 445 Posts
Originally Posted by BuckNaked2k
I don't get a million dollar paycheck from my employer. Should I get a cut of every insurance policy they sell?
Don't the insurance agents for your company get a cut of the insurance policies they sell?

What compensation an employee receives is usually not dependent on what they "should" get, but rather what the company deems is the lowest compensation they can give, while still getting decent employees. I personally think every employee of every company should get a cut of the profits while they're there, based on their relative worth to the company. Now, that's not really ever likely to happen. However, I'm not going to begrudge actors for trying to get the most compensation they can.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.