Flightplan vs Red Eye --- why did Flightplan make so much more money ?
#1
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Thread Starter
Flightplan vs Red Eye --- why did Flightplan make so much more money ?
Flightplan grossed over 200M, while redeye was less than 100M
Why is that ? I liked Red Eye better, Cillian is a so much better villain.
Why is that ? I liked Red Eye better, Cillian is a so much better villain.
#3
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by Seantn
Jodie Foster is a bigger star than Rachel McAdams.
Exactly. And, if I recall correctly, it was Foster's first film in some time. So there was a bit of hype about it.
Red Eye was definitely the better movie though.
#6
Originally Posted by Seantn
Jodie Foster is a bigger star than Rachel McAdams.
Red Eye was still a box office hit, though. I thought was better as well.
Red Eye was still a box office hit, though. I thought was better as well.
#7
DVD Talk Hero
Flightplan also had a much bigger budget, so even though it made more money, I think Red Eye made more profit, %-wise. Flightplan also had much more marketing - you couldn't get away from it's ad, where as Red Eye wasn't advertised nearly as much.
#9
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Guelph, Ontario
Posts: 9,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jodie Foster was a huge factor but Flightplan also had that "missing kid" angle and almost a supernatural feel to it's trailer, that worked wonders for The Forgotten and countless other flicks. I hated both Flightplan and The Forgotten, but I loved Red Eye...it was just a fun flick that didn't overstay it's welcome and Rachel McAdams is cute as hell.
MATT
MATT
#12
DVD Talk Legend
I have a hard time believing that many people went to a movie simply because of Jodie Foster. She has been in some successful movies, but I have a hard time buying people really go just for her.
I'm not sure why there's a difference between the two box offices. Could be release dates. Could be a better critical review. Could be Flightplan's trailer looked more appealing. The difference wasn't huge between the grosses, so it might have been a lot of little things.
I'm not sure why there's a difference between the two box offices. Could be release dates. Could be a better critical review. Could be Flightplan's trailer looked more appealing. The difference wasn't huge between the grosses, so it might have been a lot of little things.
#13
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Rampaging across DVDTalk.
Posts: 4,046
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Touchstone advertised the hell out of Flightplan. While I was aware of Red Eye, I remember seeing Craven's name and the poster and thought it was strictly a horror film. As usual, blame the marketing people.
#15
Originally Posted by Jericho
I have a hard time believing that many people went to a movie simply because of Jodie Foster. She has been in some successful movies, but I have a hard time buying people really go just for her.
"What's playing?"
"There's this plane thriller ... Jodie Foster's in it"
"Great ... let's see it"
vs
"What's playing?"
"There's this plane thriller ... I don't know any of the actors"
"What else is playing?"
or
"What's playing?"
"There's this plane thriller ... it's by that horror guy"
"Ughh ... What else is playing?"
Don't underestimate the power of a name getting the advertising behind it. Since Jodi Foster is famous, she gets the advertising in the form of the talk show circuit. And studios spend more on ads.
Originally Posted by Jericho
I'm not sure why there's a difference between the two box offices. Could be release dates. Could be a better critical review. Could be Flightplan's trailer looked more appealing. The difference wasn't huge between the grosses, so it might have been a lot of little things.
Red Eye
Opened Aug 21, 2005 (US)
3079 screens (US)
estimated budget $25M
US BO $57.9 M
foreign BO $37.7 M
total BO $95.6 M
Flightplan
Opened Sep 25, 2005 (US)
3424 screens (US)
estimated budget $55M
US BO $89.8 M
foreign BO $133.7 M
total BO $223.5 M
Opening dates look about the same. If anything, Red Eye should've had the advantage since it was released first. Flightplan has a few more screens, and somewhat better US BO. Flightplan killed Red Eye in the International market. Both have to be considered successes. I'm actually impressed with how Red Eye did, with Craven's prior movie Cursed being a bomb and having lesser star power. Reviews are actually in Red Eye's favor: on Rottentomatoes, Red Eye got 80% while Flightplan got 37%.
I think the answer to the question is the obvious: Flightplan did better because of Jodi Foster's name attraction and better/more marketing (some of which is tied to Foster). I don't how much each studio spent to promote these movies, but I bet the figure is way higher for Flightplan.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Independence, Ky
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For me, Flightplan just looked more interesting. I can remember seeing the trailer for the first time and thinking "I've got to know what happened to that little girl!". I enjoyed Flightplan quite a bit. To be fair though I never did see Red Eye so I can't say which one is the better movie.
#18
DVD Talk Hero
Originally Posted by Fincher Fan
Touchstone advertised the hell out of Flightplan. While I was aware of Red Eye, I remember seeing Craven's name and the poster and thought it was strictly a horror film. As usual, blame the marketing people.
Red Eye on the other hand, was tauted as a Wes Craven flick, and I even remember that the trailer showed Cillian Murphy's eye turn red as if he were some sort of actual monster disguised as a man. It had "Horror" written all over it.
#19
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally Posted by GoldenJCJ
Red Eye on the other hand, was tauted as a Wes Craven flick, and I even remember that the trailer showed Cillian Murphy's eye turn red as if he were some sort of actual monster disguised as a man. It had "Horror" written all over it.