Why do certain great movies like 'Cinderella Man' tank at the box office?
#1
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Thread Starter
Why do certain great movies like 'Cinderella Man' tank at the box office?
I was watching Cinderella Man the other night on HBO, and I think it is a great movie. It has a really good story, great acting, and enough drama to make you care about the characters for 2+ hours.
Now I saw Cinderella Man in the theaters, but not many did judging by the numbers, but why a movie like this does next to nothing at the box office boggles my mind. Then I see some dumb action movie make 100+ million, and I wonder what the hell is going on anymore?
Is it cause the teenagers are the majority that go to the movies, so dramas like this just don't hit a wide audience til DVD or HBO? Or am I in the minority here, and people just enjoy guilty pleasure action movies over a good drama?
I find myself only really liking movies that come out at the end of the year, as they seemed more adult and more dramatic than the summer blockbusters which to me are all about effects anymore.
By the way I am 34 years old if that makes a difference, so I guess I am not the demographic the hit movies are targeting anymore. I guess it is just frustrating that it seems they will go for the easy buck like Pirates of Caribbean type sequel in Hollywood, rather than something original that may make the viewer be patient and not have action every 5 minutes. I don't know I just feel that the majority of movies made anymore, I just have no interest in seeing, cause they have zero stories, and all action and CG effects to wow the viewer. But how many of those movies will be even thought of 10 years from now?
Now I saw Cinderella Man in the theaters, but not many did judging by the numbers, but why a movie like this does next to nothing at the box office boggles my mind. Then I see some dumb action movie make 100+ million, and I wonder what the hell is going on anymore?
Is it cause the teenagers are the majority that go to the movies, so dramas like this just don't hit a wide audience til DVD or HBO? Or am I in the minority here, and people just enjoy guilty pleasure action movies over a good drama?
I find myself only really liking movies that come out at the end of the year, as they seemed more adult and more dramatic than the summer blockbusters which to me are all about effects anymore.
By the way I am 34 years old if that makes a difference, so I guess I am not the demographic the hit movies are targeting anymore. I guess it is just frustrating that it seems they will go for the easy buck like Pirates of Caribbean type sequel in Hollywood, rather than something original that may make the viewer be patient and not have action every 5 minutes. I don't know I just feel that the majority of movies made anymore, I just have no interest in seeing, cause they have zero stories, and all action and CG effects to wow the viewer. But how many of those movies will be even thought of 10 years from now?
#2
Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, in the case of Cinderella Man, I think not that many people wanted to see another boxing movie after Million Dollar Baby had such a large exposure the previous year. Also, the movie seemed like oscar bait from the start with the uplifting story and Renee Zelwegger. Terrible movies make a nice buck because they occasionally look cool and people get caught up in the advertising.
#4
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Out of the sandbox!
Posts: 1,609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think it has something to do with the story line also. I mean, from the first trailer I guessed the whole story>
boxer guy was good
boxer guy hit a slump
boxer guy somehow finds it in himself to kick ass
boxer guy starts being good again
boxer guy goes against bad-ass boxer guy
boxer guy wins
Now, add tears, some sob story, and make the boxer guy destitute, and voila!
You have the plot for multiple movies with just a few changes. That is the reason I didn't see it in the theaters, IMA. And, when I did rent it, guess what? The plot line was>
boxer guy was good
boxer guy hit a slump
boxer guy somehow finds it in himself to kick ass
boxer guy starts being good again
boxer guy goes against bad-ass boxer guy
boxer guy wins
boxer guy was good
boxer guy hit a slump
boxer guy somehow finds it in himself to kick ass
boxer guy starts being good again
boxer guy goes against bad-ass boxer guy
boxer guy wins
Now, add tears, some sob story, and make the boxer guy destitute, and voila!
You have the plot for multiple movies with just a few changes. That is the reason I didn't see it in the theaters, IMA. And, when I did rent it, guess what? The plot line was>
boxer guy was good
boxer guy hit a slump
boxer guy somehow finds it in himself to kick ass
boxer guy starts being good again
boxer guy goes against bad-ass boxer guy
boxer guy wins
#5
DVD Talk Hero
Because the ads made it look extremely generic. I remember theater owners promising full refunds if you didn't like the movie.
That said, two of my favorite movies that were wide-release also bombed at theaters: Fight Club and Dark City.
That said, two of my favorite movies that were wide-release also bombed at theaters: Fight Club and Dark City.
#8
DVD Talk Reviewer
There are more reasons than can be counted as to why movies that are considered "great" bomb at the box office. And it's NOT because they aren't great movies with superb word of mouth. Take a look at Kiss Kiss, Bang Bang.
I thought Cinderella Man was an excellent film, but the storyline was HIGHLY predictable. However, the element of poverty and already established family made it a notch better than Rocky for me. I've never been a "huge" fan of the Rocky films, however in Cinderella Man I appreciated the visual style, the element of the depression, and the performance clocked in from Crowe. I do realize that it is a boxing film that borrows immensely from other films.
So ... Kiss Kiss, Bang Bang didn't succed, even though it was one of the most original comedy/action film noir flicks in a long time. Cinderella Man didn't succeed even though it was very original and obvious, yet was driving by Ron Howard, Russell Crowe, and Renee Zellwenger (ugh). The Academy would not honor boxing films two years in a row, ESPECIALLY when Clint Eastwood won for a far more emotionally tearing film the year before.
My opinion to your question? There, well, isn't a set answer. It all depends on varying elements of the films, even if these films are great. Star power, repetition of story - they all can dictate demand.
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind didn't hail much at the box office (
I thought Cinderella Man was an excellent film, but the storyline was HIGHLY predictable. However, the element of poverty and already established family made it a notch better than Rocky for me. I've never been a "huge" fan of the Rocky films, however in Cinderella Man I appreciated the visual style, the element of the depression, and the performance clocked in from Crowe. I do realize that it is a boxing film that borrows immensely from other films.
So ... Kiss Kiss, Bang Bang didn't succed, even though it was one of the most original comedy/action film noir flicks in a long time. Cinderella Man didn't succeed even though it was very original and obvious, yet was driving by Ron Howard, Russell Crowe, and Renee Zellwenger (ugh). The Academy would not honor boxing films two years in a row, ESPECIALLY when Clint Eastwood won for a far more emotionally tearing film the year before.
My opinion to your question? There, well, isn't a set answer. It all depends on varying elements of the films, even if these films are great. Star power, repetition of story - they all can dictate demand.
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind didn't hail much at the box office (
#10
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
To me, it looked like Seabiscuit with a boxer. Even the trailer practically used the same voiceover. "When America was at its darkest hour, one man man gave the nation hope...blah blah blah."
And I didn't really care for Seabiscuit.
And I didn't really care for Seabiscuit.
#13
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When the trailer played in a theater I was at and the title "Cinderella Man" came up, a bunch of people started laughing, but not in a good way. Probably a good indicator of why people didn't go see it.
#14
DVD Talk Legend
IMO, Russell Crowe is the only reason to see CINDERELLA MAN. Howard's direction is so by-the-numbers, he turns what could have been a great movie into a cookie-cutter "average" film.
So basically what you have is a great performance in an average picture.
So basically what you have is a great performance in an average picture.
#15
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just saw this movie over the weekend, and I was pleasantly surprised. Great acting, veryy good direction, and the set design was superb. Really captured a great story, IMHO.
For those who complain about "guessing" a story, come on. Like Superman is hard to guess? Supes come back, Lex causes trouble, Lois gets in trouble, Supes saves the day? Should I not go see this movie because I've guessed the story line? I dunno, seems like a weak argument for or against a movie, IMHO.
For those who complain about "guessing" a story, come on. Like Superman is hard to guess? Supes come back, Lex causes trouble, Lois gets in trouble, Supes saves the day? Should I not go see this movie because I've guessed the story line? I dunno, seems like a weak argument for or against a movie, IMHO.
#16
DVD Talk Legend
I think tvpuff nailed it, in the fact that from the very first viewing of the trailer, the movie just screamed "Hey! Look at me! I'm an uplifting-yet-tearjerking movie with great actors! Give me Oscars!" Big turn-off.
#17
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by The_Infidel
I think tvpuff nailed it, in the fact that from the very first viewing of the trailer, the movie just screamed "Hey! Look at me! I'm an uplifting-yet-tearjerking movie with great actors! Give me Oscars!" Big turn-off.
Geez, I thought you were describing Apollo 13, plus we already knew the ending to that movie going in. But then again, I guess that movie sucked too.
#20
Originally Posted by Patman
I would go with timing of release, and Russell Crowe's Q-factor being down in the dumps after throwing temper tantrums at the hotel clerk.
#21
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Traverse City, MI
Posts: 3,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by tvpuff
Well, in the case of Cinderella Man, I think not that many people wanted to see another boxing movie after Million Dollar Baby had such a large exposure the previous year. Also, the movie seemed like oscar bait from the start with the uplifting story and Renee Zelwegger. Terrible movies make a nice buck because they occasionally look cool and people get caught up in the advertising.
I agree about the oscar bait thats what I thought when I seen the previews too, and it wasnt a movie I had to see in the theaters, I think big dumb action movies do well in theaters cause they are fun to see in the theater, big screen etc and they are fun. Some type of movies you need to see in the theaters like Misssion impossible 3 and another movie like Crash which is excellent you dont really need to see it in the theater to really experiance it
#25
DVD Talk Legend
Look at all these excuses! Let me add one. I don't know exactly why Cinderella Man didn't earn more, but I will say straight dramas tend not to sell all that well (especially those not released around Christmas season).