DVD Talk
NASA Public Affairs political appointee resigns [Archive] - DVD Talk Forum
 
Best Sellers
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
DVD Blowouts
1.
300 [Blu-ray]
Buy: $34.99 $22.95
2.
3.
4.
5.
24 - Season Six
Buy: $59.98 $19.99
6.
7.
24: Redemption
Buy: $26.98 $14.99
8.
9.
10.

PDA
DVD Reviews

View Full Version : NASA Public Affairs political appointee resigns


shaun3000
02-08-06, 12:21 PM
He claimed to have graduated from Texas A&M but the university said, yesterday, that he dropped out before graduating to work for Bush's re-election campaign. Three of his more glaring achievements while at NASA were effectively censoring news releases regarding climate research, requiring that the word 'theory' be added after every mention of the Big Bang, saying it's not NASA's place to give school children only have of the picture, and requiring every release about research to somehow tie-in with Bush's vision of returning to the moon.

Read the article for more. If you click the link, it will give you links to a few other articles about this.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/08/politics/08nasa.htm
George C. Deutsch, the young presidential appointee at NASA who told public affairs workers to limit reporters' access to a top climate scientist and told a Web designer to add the word "theory" at every mention of the Big Bang, resigned yesterday, agency officials said.

Mr. Deutsch's resignation came on the same day that officials at Texas A&M University confirmed that he did not graduate from there, as his résumé on file at the agency asserted.

Officials at NASA headquarters declined to discuss the reason for the resignation.

"Under NASA policy, it is inappropriate to discuss personnel matters," said Dean Acosta, the deputy assistant administrator for public affairs and Mr. Deutsch's boss.

The resignation came as the National Aeronautics and Space Administration was preparing to review its policies for communicating science to the public. The review was ordered Friday by Michael D. Griffin, the NASA administrator, after a week in which many agency scientists and midlevel public affairs officials described to The New York Times instances in which they said political pressure was applied to limit or flavor discussions of topics uncomfortable to the Bush administration, particularly global warming.

"As we have stated in the past, NASA is in the process of revising our public affairs policies across the agency to ensure our commitment to open and full communications," the statement from Mr. Acosta said.

The statement said the resignation of Mr. Deutsch was "a separate matter."

Mr. Deutsch, 24, was offered a job as a writer and editor in NASA's public affairs office in Washington last year after working on President Bush's re-election campaign and inaugural committee, according to his résumé. No one has disputed those parts of the document.

According to his résumé, Mr. Deutsch received a "Bachelor of Arts in journalism, Class of 2003."

Yesterday, officials at Texas A&M said that was not the case.

"George Carlton Deutsch III did attend Texas A&M University but has not completed the requirements for a degree," said an e-mail message from Rita Presley, assistant to the registrar at the university, responding to a query from The Times.

Repeated calls and e-mail messages to Mr. Deutsch on Tuesday were not answered.

Mr. Deutsch's educational record was first challenged on Monday by Nick Anthis, who graduated from Texas A&M last year with a biochemistry degree and has been writing a Web log on science policy, scientificactivist.blogspot.com.

After Mr. Anthis read about the problems at NASA, he said in an interview: "It seemed like political figures had really overstepped the line. I was just going to write some commentary on this when somebody tipped me off that George Deutsch might not have graduated."

He posted a blog entry asserting this after he checked with the university's association of former students. He reported that the association said Mr. Deutsch received no degree.

A copy of Mr. Deutsch's résumé was provided to The Times by someone working in NASA headquarters who, along with many other NASA employees, said Mr. Deutsch played a small but significant role in an intensifying effort at the agency to exert political control over the flow of information to the public.

Such complaints came to the fore starting in late January, when James E. Hansen, the climate scientist, and several midlevel public affairs officers told The Times that political appointees, including Mr. Deutsch, were pressing to limit Dr. Hansen's speaking and interviews on the threats posed by global warming.

Yesterday, Dr. Hansen said that the questions about Mr. Deutsch's credentials were important, but were a distraction from the broader issue of political control of scientific information.

"He's only a bit player," Dr. Hansen said of Mr. Deutsch. " The problem is much broader and much deeper and it goes across agencies. That's what I'm really concerned about."

"On climate, the public has been misinformed and not informed," he said. "The foundation of a democracy is an informed public, which obviously means an honestly informed public. That's the big issue here."

VinVega
02-08-06, 12:29 PM
He's politically connected. I don't worry about him starving on a corner. Sounds like a real solid pick by the administration.

classicman2
02-08-06, 12:31 PM
If the government did what they should - they wouldn't have to worry about a NASA public affairs officer or any other officer, because there wouldn't be a NASA.

General Zod
02-08-06, 12:33 PM
I thought he was doing a heck of a job.

VinVega
02-08-06, 12:34 PM
If the government did what they should - they wouldn't have to worry about a NASA public affairs officer or any other officer, because there wouldn't be a NASA.
Is this the "smaller government" classicman I've heard rumors about? ;)

Space exploration is a competitive national interest, so I don't see why we should not have the government involved in it. Other countries' governments are in the business of space.

classicman2
02-08-06, 01:32 PM
No, I'm just opposed to throwing money down a dark hole - or up a dark hole as far as NASA is concerned. ;)

Now if U. S. companies want to get into the private launch business, I have no problem with that.

wendersfan
02-08-06, 02:28 PM
Is this the "smaller government" classicman I've heard rumors about? ;)I think c-man is concerned that Bush's next Social Security reform idea will involve shooting old people out into space. :)

Ranger
02-08-06, 02:49 PM
I remember some quote that said something like even if the whole moon was made of gold, it still wouldn't be worth it to go there.

Any idea what the exact quote is and who said it?

I'm curious if it's really true.

classicman2
02-08-06, 03:03 PM
I think c-man is concerned that Bush's next Social Security reform idea will involve shooting old people out into space. :)

No, now he's calling for a commission.

He wasn't calling for a commission this time last year, was he? What happened? ;)

Ranger
02-08-06, 03:07 PM
No, now he's calling for a commission.

He wasn't calling for a commission this time last year, was he? What happened? ;)
He wants a commission to assure Americans that HIS ss plan will work. :)

VinVega
02-08-06, 03:18 PM
Don't try to sidetrack this wonderful NASA thread. We were on a countdown to shoot c-man into space. :D

classicman2
02-08-06, 03:25 PM
I couldn't miss a small slam for the benefit of our Bushites on the forum. :)

uberjoe
02-08-06, 03:29 PM
Don't try to sidetrack this wonderful NASA thread. We were on a countdown to shoot c-man into space. :D

We have the technology!

Ranger
02-08-06, 03:34 PM
i think this was it.

But Park says it would be cheaper to gather the helium from seawater. As for other minerals, he says, "At $10,000 a pound to get things into low-Earth orbit, it wouldn't be economical to mine the moon even if the whole thing were made of gold."

http://www.usatoday.com/news/science/2003-12-04-moon-usat_x.htm

Breakfast with Girls
02-08-06, 03:58 PM
No, I'm just opposed to throwing money down a dark hole - or up a dark hole as far as NASA is concerned. ;)

Now if U. S. companies want to get into the private launch business, I have no problem with that.So, let me get this straight.

<b><u>Classicman's worldview</u></b>

Space exploration: Not the government's interest. Let private industry fill any need.

Social security and medicare: Vital government interest! Private industry could not possibly fill this need!

classicman2
02-08-06, 04:05 PM
I'll argue that the public in general benefits a hell of a lot more from SS & Medicare than they do with manned space exploation.

Well, there really isn't any argument, is there?

Groucho
02-08-06, 04:09 PM
Wow. At 24 my biggest problem with where to hide the bong if I heard mom coming down the hall.

VinVega
02-08-06, 04:24 PM
I'll argue that the public in general benefits a hell of a lot more from SS & Medicare than they do with manned space exploation.

Well, there really isn't any argument, is there?
Why can't we have both? :(

VinVega
02-08-06, 04:25 PM
So, let me get this straight.

<b><u>Classicman's worldview</u></b>

Space exploration: Not the government's interest. Let private industry fill any need.

Social security and medicare: Vital government interest! Private industry could not possibly fill this need!
He's an enigma, wrapped in a riddle. I learned that a long time ago. ;)

bhk
02-08-06, 04:30 PM
The black hole of the social programs is OK to c-man because he thinks that it creates more dem voters.

Red Dog
02-08-06, 04:51 PM
C-man's view is pretty simple.

Little green men are not signatories to the social contract.

classicman2
02-08-06, 05:29 PM
Why can't we have both? :(

Why can't we have can't national health insurance?

It's a hell more important than the space station or another useless shuttle flight.

classicman2
02-08-06, 05:34 PM
I'm more forgiving of Richard M. Nixon for Watergate than I am for his authorization for the development of the Shuttle program.

Groucho
02-08-06, 05:44 PM
Why can't we have can't national health insurance?It's really quite simple:

1. National health insurance.
2. ???
3. COMMUNISM

Red Dog
02-08-06, 08:01 PM
I have a feeling c-man was at the track when Armstrong set foot on the moon.

classicman2
02-08-06, 08:11 PM
There at least a half-assed reason for the manned space program then. We were in competition with the Soviet Union.

There's no reason now for it.

BTW: It was nightime where I lived when Armstrong 'supposedly' stepped out on the moon. Therefore, I wasn't at the track.

I should add that Texas didn't have horse racing then. :)

Birrman54
02-08-06, 08:17 PM
There at least a half-assed reason for the manned space program then. We were in competition with the Soviet Union.

There's no reason now for it.

BTW: It was nightime where I lived when Armstrong 'supposedly' stepped out on the moon. Therefore, I wasn't at the track.

I should add that Texas didn't have horse racing then. :)

you don't believe we landed on the moon?

So in your mind there is absolutely NO benefit for space exploration or research?

classicman2
02-08-06, 08:18 PM
The cost far outweigh the benefits. I'm speaking of the manned space program - especially the shuttle.

Breakfast with Girls
02-08-06, 08:24 PM
BTW: It was nightime where I lived when Armstrong <b>'supposedly'</b> stepped out on the moon. Therefore, I wasn't at the track.Fascinating. Please continue.

-popcorn-

classicman2
02-08-06, 08:26 PM
Question: Why are many so willing to take the government's word that we landed on the moon when those same people are not willing to take the government's word on anything else? :lol:

Red Dog
02-08-06, 08:45 PM
The cost far outweigh the benefits.


Sounds like welfare. :lol:

Therefore, can we give that up as well as the manned space program?

classicman2
02-08-06, 08:57 PM
I surprised at you supporting NASA.

I assume you're expanding your view of the commerce clause somewhat. Perhaps on NASA you're a 'living constitution' type. :lol:

Red Dog
02-08-06, 08:58 PM
I surprised at you supporting NASA.

I assume you're expanding your view of the commerce clause somewhat. Perhaps on NASA you're a 'living constitution' type. :lol:


Where did I say I support NASA? I'm with you.

Jason
02-08-06, 09:30 PM
I surprised at you supporting NASA.

I assume you're expanding your view of the commerce clause somewhat. Perhaps on NASA you're a 'living constitution' type. :lol:

Get back to the "supposedly" landed on the moon part.

slappypete
02-12-06, 11:07 AM
I remember some quote that said something like even if the whole moon was made of gold, it still wouldn't be worth it to go there.

Any idea what the exact quote is and who said it?


I don't know who said that, but that person is obviously a moran. Anybody with a 3rd grade education knows that the moon is made of cheese!!! How could we not go back to the moon, that's some really good cheese and will spoil if we don't save it soon.

Mammal
02-12-06, 01:26 PM
I'm an old fart too, but I support NASA. Space exploration is BAD, as in good-bad.