NEW YORK - Black Sabbath, Miles Davis and the Sex Pistols are among five musical legends to be inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame.
The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame Foundation will hold its induction ceremony March 13 at the Waldorf Astoria Hotel in Manhattan, the organization announced Monday.
Also to be inducted into the class of 2006: 1980s New Wave band Blondie and Southern rockers Lynyrd Skynyrd.
Herb Alpert and Jerry Moss, who founded A&M records in 1962, will receive a lifetime achievement award in the non-performer category.
Inductees into the side-men category will be announced at a later date.
Musicians, industry professionals and journalists vote on the nominations. Artists are eligible to be inducted into the Rock Hall after at least 25 years have passed since their first record was released.
The Hall of Fame only inducts people - not wailing muppets.
;)
Mordred
11-28-05, 12:27 PM
Can't believe Sabbath is getting inducted after all the crap Ozzy talked about the HOF over the years. I expect Alice Cooper and Kiss will be along shortly.
Hollowgen
11-28-05, 05:16 PM
oh good, the sex pistols. they've been non-stop great for decades. maybe next we'll get someone like... a flock of seagulls.
wendersfan
11-28-05, 05:47 PM
oh good, the sex pistols. they've been non-stop great for decades. maybe next we'll get someone like... a flock of seagulls.If not for the Pistols rock music would be unrecognizable today. I can't even imagine what it would sound like.
nodeerforamonth
11-28-05, 06:03 PM
If not for the Pistols rock music would be unrecognizable today. I can't even imagine what it would sound like.
Exactly.
grunter
11-28-05, 06:10 PM
oh good, the sex pistols. they've been non-stop great for decades. maybe next we'll get someone like... a flock of seagulls.
Hey no dissin' the "'gulls," man.
Let's see Bono pull off that hair.
;)
Filmmaker
11-28-05, 06:26 PM
Well, this is a bit of a letdown after U2's induction last year to say the least...
Oh and grunter, did you ever see Bono at Live Aid? Not so far off the Seagulls map...
That was my first thought too. Great to see Sabbath, hope Sharon dies before the induction ceremony.
The Sex Pistols were useless.
KnightLerxst
11-28-05, 06:44 PM
Yeah...big shocker on Rush getting snubbed again. Ah well.
cungar
11-28-05, 06:52 PM
If not for the Pistols rock music would be unrecognizable today. I can't even imagine what it would sound like.
That's just ridiculous. The Clash, Ramones, Buzzcocks etc. would have more have than taken up the slack. The Pistols were just the most over the top punk band for a short period. The 8 or 9 great songs they wrote certainly deserve accolades but they are vastly overrated. And what the hell is so great about how rock sounds today?
Numanoid
11-28-05, 06:52 PM
How can one seriously deny the impact that the Sex Pistols had on rock music?
Coral
11-28-05, 06:56 PM
I don't care how influential their album was, one album is not enough to warrant an induction into the HOF.
nodeerforamonth
11-28-05, 07:19 PM
The Sex Pistols were useless.
?!?!?!??! Useless?!?!? Useless?? Shirley, you must be a troll.
I can understand not liking them, but saying they're "useless"!?!??! Wow!
I mean, I HATE Pink Floyd and U2, but I wouldn't say that they are "useless". Maybe I'd use that word for the Grateful Dead...
Jason
11-28-05, 07:23 PM
How can one seriously deny the impact that the Sex Pistols had on rock music?
I can. They had one album, which, while cool, really didn't lead to anything. The punk scene was already a strong underground movement, in both the US and the UK. They were just a public face for it. If it hadn't been for the antics of Sid Vicious (who doesn't even appear on the album), they would have been a footnote, as well known by the general public as the Slits or X-Ray Specs.
Now if you want to talk about marketing, and manipulating the media, they were as influential as the Beatles. They just didn't add anything meaningful to rock music.
grunter
11-28-05, 07:23 PM
Well, this is a bit of a letdown after U2's induction last year to say the least...
Oh and grunter, did you ever see Bono at Live Aid? Not so far off the Seagulls map...
You dare mock the sacred moussy mullet?
Oh, the sacrilege.
;)
RichardW
11-28-05, 07:33 PM
I don't care how influential their album was, one album is not enough to warrant an induction into the HOF.
:up:
paulringodaman
11-28-05, 07:38 PM
I don't know about you, buy Lynyrd Skynyrd being inducted is fantastic!!!
auto
11-28-05, 07:39 PM
How can one seriously deny the impact that the Sex Pistols had on rock music?
Exactly.
I don't care how influential their album was, one album is not enough to warrant an induction into the HOF.
That is incorrect.
auto
11-28-05, 07:40 PM
Well, this is a bit of a letdown after U2's induction last year to say the least...
:rolleyes:
Hollowgen
11-28-05, 09:36 PM
I don't care how influential their album was, one album is not enough to warrant an induction into the HOF.
that's all i'm getting at. i love Nevermind..., and don't deny it's importance. we're all allowed to have different opinions, right? :)
and FYI, i LOVE the first Flock album!
Numanoid
11-28-05, 10:08 PM
I don't care how influential their album was, one album is not enough to warrant an induction into the HOF.Apparently, you're wrong. ;)
And this is the Rock and Roll Hall of FAME. The Sex Pistols marked a complete change in the direction of rock music, and are a significant historical band in that regard. Of course they weren't the first nor the best, but they were the pivot around which the mainstream swung at that time. A rock and Roll Hall of Fame without them is ridiculous.
I'm still trying to get my head around Miles Davis.
Andalusia
11-28-05, 10:17 PM
I'm still trying to get my head around Miles Davis.
Same here. I'm a big fan, but that seems odd (even considering his albums "In a Silent Way" and onward).
And I'm confident in saying that if there's one thing Miles Davis wouldn't give a shit about, it's this.
B5Erik
11-28-05, 10:56 PM
OK, here's the thing.
The Sex Pistols - one real album - are in. KISS - 30+ albums, millions sold, hundreds of bands with albums released on major labels influenced by them, the band that changed the live concert presentation - is not.
What planet are these voters living on?
You can legitimately argue that The Sex Pistols belong in the HOF, but not before KISS. KISS changed a lot more of the Rock and Roll landscape than the Pistols did - and they did it for a lot longer, with a hell of a lot more success.
This just shows the biases that the voters have against populist music. I mean, Miles Fucking Davis? In the ROCK AND ROLL Hall of Fame? He was BRILLIANT, but he was a JAZZ artist, period. Why not put in Mozart while you're at it? Come on!
It's nice to see them allow Black Sabbath and Lynyrd Skynyrd into their precious hall, but bands like KISS, Alice Cooper, Deep Purple, Rush, Van Halen, Iron Maiden and others are deserving as well - and should have been inducted years ago (with the exception of Maiden, who are in their first year of "eligibility").
Hell, Maiden could be a benchmark as well. They are a band that at their height played multiple sold out shows at venues that "bigger" bands had trouble selling out once - and without much airplay. Maiden influenced thousands of bands, and set the standard for Heavy Metal that is still the standard today. Hell, I'm starting to see current high school kids wearing Iron Maiden T-Shirts - their influence still remains strong today. If the Sex Pistols are in, Iron Maiden MUST go in, or it is just further proof of what a joke the hall is.
wendersfan
11-29-05, 08:32 AM
OK, here's the thing.
The Sex Pistols - one real album - are in. KISS - 30+ albums, millions sold, hundreds of bands with albums released on major labels influenced by them, the band that changed the live concert presentation - is not.
What planet are these voters living on?A planet where the Pistols released one classic album, and KISS have released a long and sordid career's worth of shit. :)
ETA: As far as Miles Davis, he invented and popularized jazz/rock fusion. I think that warrants induction.
Numanoid
11-29-05, 08:42 AM
KISS changed a lot more of the Rock and Roll landscape than the Pistols did How?
mndtrp
11-29-05, 09:29 AM
Not that I usually care about the Hall of Fame, but it's nice to see Black Sabbath and Lynyrd Skynyrd put in.
grunter
11-29-05, 11:49 AM
OK, here's the thing.
The Sex Pistols - one real album - are in. KISS - 30+ albums, millions sold, hundreds of bands with albums released on major labels influenced by them, the band that changed the live concert presentation - is not.
What planet are these voters living on?
Maybe it's not about number of records sold?
cungar
11-29-05, 01:47 PM
I'm wondering if they inducted Miles to open up the playing field wider because let's face it, the next couple decades it's going to get harder and harder to find worthy inductees. From the 80's? 90s? Truly great top level bands in the league of the Stones, the Who, U2, The Kinks etc. They ain't there.
wendersfan
11-29-05, 02:03 PM
I'm wondering if they inducted Miles to open up the playing field wider because let's face it, the next couple decades it's going to get harder and harder to find worthy inductees. From the 80's? 90s? Truly great top level bands in the league of the Stones, the Who, U2, The Kinks etc. They ain't there.Yeah, cause all those bands like R.E.M., The Pixies, The Replacements, The Smiths, Joy Division, Gang of Four, Sonic Youth, Hüsker Dü, and the Stone Roses sucked. -ohbfrank-
nodeerforamonth
11-29-05, 03:20 PM
The New York Dolls should be in before KISS. After all, they were a big influence on KISS.
nodeerforamonth
11-29-05, 03:22 PM
that's all i'm getting at. i love Nevermind..., and don't deny it's importance. we're all allowed to have different opinions, right? :)
Are you talking about Nirvana? They released three full studio albums. In addition to a couple live ones and another one full of b-sides and rarities. And a box set of rarities. They're far from a one album band!
Filmmaker
11-29-05, 03:45 PM
Yeah, cause all those bands like R.E.M., The Pixies, The Replacements, The Smiths, Joy Division, Gang of Four, Sonic Youth, Hüsker Dü, and the Stone Roses sucked. -ohbfrank-
Well, R.E.M. didn't...
Jason
11-29-05, 05:45 PM
I'm wondering if they inducted Miles to open up the playing field wider because let's face it, the next couple decades it's going to get harder and harder to find worthy inductees. From the 80's? 90s? Truly great top level bands in the league of the Stones, the Who, U2, The Kinks etc. They ain't there.
Well, if they hadn't been in such a big hurry to put all their personal favorites in right away, they wouldn't have this "problem". Look at the first year's worth of inductions. In one year, they inducted:
Chuck Berry
James Brown
Ray Charles
Sam Cooke
Fats Domino
The Everly Brothers
Buddy Holly
Jerry Lee Lewis
Elvis Presley
Little Richard
Pretty much every inductee on this list could have carried the entire program for the year. I know they were just starting out, but this is overkill.
However, I don't think they inducted Davis for this reason. For some insane reason, they like to think that the rock and roll "attitude" pervades every aspect of music. I'm wondering how long before a non-musician is nominated in the main category. After all, if Miles Davis can represent "rock and roll", can't Quentin Tarentino? Lenny Bruce? Bruce Lee? Eric Cartman?
B5Erik
11-29-05, 10:31 PM
A planet where the Pistols released one classic album, and KISS have released a long and sordid career's worth of shit. :)
The Pistols released one classic album? Classic to some, crap to others.
KISS could always carry a tune better than the Pistols ever could - and they influenced more bands, too. In every measure - influence on other bands, changing the Rock landscape, album and ticket sales - KISS far outshines the Sex Pistols. That's not to minimize what the Pistols did, but if we're having this conversation you obviously either weren't around when KISS was at their height, or you have just chosen to disregard all that they accomplished based on personal tastes.
[Quote: Originally Posted by B5Erik
KISS changed a lot more of the Rock and Roll landscape than the Pistols did]
How?
KISS completely changed how Rock concerts were presented live. They took the low tech theatrics of Alice Cooper and made it high tech. KISS introduced fireworks, hydraulic lifts, and most of the things that are considered pre-requisites for live Rock concert presentations today. KISS was one of the first bands to actually MOVE a lot on stage and work up a sweat.
Beyond that their musical influence extends far beyond the obvious bands and into others that you wouldn't expect (including Pearl Jam, Soundgarden, and Garth Brooks, as well as some of the more obvious bands like Skid Row, Anthrax, and Motley Crue).
(And, The New York Dolls weren't as much of an influence on KISS as many have made them out to be. KISS tried the Dolls approach very early on, and it didn't work for them, so they came up with their own thing - both musically and visually.)
It's not just about the number of records and tickets sold - but that is a part, and a part that KISS excelled at.
It's clear that there are a lot of people who just don't know how big KISS was (and still is to a degree) not only in terms of their commercial success, but in terms of their musical quality and their influence on literally hundreds of bands who have recorded albums for major labels (and thousands of bands who wanted to).
I don't like a lot of bands that are in the Hall of Fame, but I don't argue their place there. KISS has EARNED a place there, and the fact that they, along with Rush, Deep Purple, Van Halen, Alice Cooper, Ted Nugent, and others aren't in there is a joke. A very bad one.
B5Erik
11-29-05, 10:49 PM
Yeah, cause all those bands like R.E.M., The Pixies, The Replacements, The Smiths, Joy Division, Gang of Four, Sonic Youth, Hüsker Dü, and the Stone Roses sucked. -ohbfrank-
I could see R.E.M., The Smiths, The Cure, and a few others in the Hall, and, as I stated before, bands like Iron Maiden, Metallica, and Megadeth would have to be inducted IF the hall is worth a damn.
Like KISS, Iron Maiden's influence was huge. They changed the sound of Heavy Metal - love it or hate it, it doesn't matter. It was a hugely successful sub-genre of Rock, and Maiden is still considered by a huge number of Metal fans to be the best Metal band ever - over Sabbath, over Metallica, over Judas Priest. Maiden was, and still is, a BRILLIANT live band. AMAZINGLY good musicianship, great theatrics, and a ton of energy expended on stage by the band members themselves made for arguably the best Heavy Metal concerts ever.
Maiden sold out 4 shows in 4 consecutive nights at the Long Beach arena in 1985. 48,000 tickets sold - with very little radio airplay. 2 years later they played two sold out shows there. They have been able to sell concert tickets better than bands with 2 or 3 times their record sales for over 2 decades. In 2003 they still sold out the Long Beach Arena and nearly sold out Irvine Meadows as well - with NO airplay in the area at all! They also have more than enough Gold and Platinum to have earned their way into the Hall.
KISS and Iron Maiden are my benchmarks for the Hall to see if it has any credibility at all, or if it's just a tool for the snobby "artsy" folks to celebrate only what they like and exclude everything else. Rock and Roll is music for the masses, not just for the elite snobs. Right now the Hall is for the snobs.
nodeerforamonth
11-30-05, 12:07 PM
KISS definitely deserves to be in there.
wendersfan
11-30-05, 01:45 PM
KISS completely changed how Rock concerts were presented live. They took the low tech theatrics of Alice Cooper and made it high tech. KISS introduced fireworks, hydraulic lifts, and most of the things that are considered pre-requisites for live Rock concert presentations today. KISS was one of the No offense, but you don't know what you're talking about. Have you never heard of The Who? They didn't need the invasion of Normandy going on onstage to create excitement, they did it with their playing and onstage charisma. KISS has no charisma unless they put on makeup.
And I hate to burst your bubble, but a single concert of the Sex Pistols (Manchester Lesser Free Trade Hall, June 4, 1976) is probably more imortant and influential than every show KISS ever performed, <i>in toto</i>.
atlantamoi
11-30-05, 02:35 PM
Maybe Kiss would already be in if they had stopped in 1979.
Glad to see the Sex Pistols in. I really find it odd that some people don't see how that one album is quite enough.
Ginwen
11-30-05, 03:01 PM
I'm glad to see the Sex Pistols finally getting in.
People I knew were angry at them for even daring to exist at the time. They were dividing people then, and still are after all these years. :up:
Illinois Enema Bandit
11-30-05, 04:39 PM
KISS and Iron Maiden are my benchmarks for the Hall to see if it has any credibility at all, or if it's just a tool for the snobby "artsy" folks to celebrate only what they like and exclude everything else. Rock and Roll is music for the masses, not just for the elite snobs. Right now the Hall is for the snobs.
While I agree with your general point, were this lot "artsy", the so-called RnRHoF would include, in addition to Rush, the likes of Roxy Music, Yes, Genesis, Peter Gabriel, King Crimson...
auto
11-30-05, 04:50 PM
Yeah, cause all those bands like R.E.M., The Pixies, The Replacements, The Smiths, Joy Division, Gang of Four, Sonic Youth, Hüsker Dü, and the Stone Roses sucked. -ohbfrank-
Well, R.E.M. didn't...
:lol: rotfl :lol:
I suppose you're entitled to your opinion. Each of those bands, in their prime, were heads and tails better than U2 was in their prime.
Maybe you need to broaden your musical spectrum. :shrug:
dick_grayson
11-30-05, 05:15 PM
:lol: rotfl :lol:
I suppose you're entitled to your opinion. Each of those bands, in their prime, were heads and tails better than U2 was in their prime.
Maybe you need to broaden your musical spectrum. :shrug:
:up:
rw2516
11-30-05, 05:15 PM
KISS may not be the best songwriters or muscians but they definately shook things up doing something that had never been done before. Never listened to the Sex Pistols, don't have an opinion. Pretty much all the pioneers of the 50s and 60s are in already. i think alot of the classic rockers from the 70s will still get in. Van Halen is a shoo in eventually. Same with Alice Cooper. Even Ted Nugent has a chance. I don't think a lot of popular bands from the time will ever make it :Styx, Kansas, Journey, REO, BOC, Deep Purple. As for the 80's Mellencamp and Bon Jovi will probably get there. Nirvana is a no-brainer. I'd like to see them start leaning toward more individuals like Rory Gallagher and Johnny Winter. Or people who have been around a long time solo and in different bands for the collective work like Greg Lake(King Crimson, ELP, Asia) or Paul Rogers(Free, Bad Company Firm) whereas the bands themselves may not warrant induction. Also they should induct albums.
Jason
11-30-05, 06:31 PM
And I hate to burst your bubble, but a single concert of the Sex Pistols (Manchester Lesser Free Trade Hall, June 4, 1976) is probably more imortant and influential than every show KISS ever performed, <i>in toto</i>.
Why? Because it's one of the few shows they bothered to actually perform at?
Dubya
11-30-05, 07:39 PM
Alice Cooper has been eligible for quite awhile now and to my recollection has yet to even appear on the finalists ballot, so don't hold your breath waiting for that one. The only way Ted Nugent will get in is to buy a ticket. Over the next 10 years Mellencamp, REM, Metallica, Run DMC (first rap act to get in guaranteed), The Red Hot Chili Peppers, Madonna, The Smiths, The Replacements, The Pixies, The Beastie Boys and Guns N' Roses are some of the bands I see being inducted.
Brain Stew
11-30-05, 08:22 PM
Why? Because it's one of the few shows they bothered to actually perform at?
That concert is the one that caused quite afew Mancunians to start bands. Most notably Joy Division, who went on to become New Order and almost singlehandedly finance a record label, influencial night club and the "rave culture."
In America it's hard to understand this, because raves didn't really become mainstream until around 95-97 while in the UK raves were old hat by 89.
Also, a little band known as The Smiths ;) were supposedly there as well as the Buzzcocks.
I've said before that the 1980s acts are going to be hard for the RRHoF. Do they go with the alternative acts or the more popular metal acts? Personally I prefer the former more. But who knows what will happen?
Filmmaker
11-30-05, 08:24 PM
I suppose you're entitled to your opinion. Each of those bands, in their prime, were heads and tails better than U2 was in their prime.
Maybe you need to broaden your musical spectrum. :shrug:
Holy shit. Tell me you don't have a voter registration card...
ChrisKnudsen
11-30-05, 08:29 PM
What bands have been influenced by Kiss have been good? Seriously. The Sex Pistols are pretty much the symbol of punk rock, at least, to the eyes of the mainstream. Think of all the punk rock bands that these no-knowledge muscians inspired. In just one year after, punk rock flourished across the world with literally hundreds of thousands of bands. A lot of them would fade into obscurity and be bootlegged 20 years down the line on Killed by Death sort of line comps but who can not smile to something like the Notsensiables' "I'm in Love with Margeret Thatcher" or the Tits' "Daddy is my Pusher." Anyone and everyone that didn't know how to play their instruments were inspired to play.
wendersfan
11-30-05, 09:00 PM
That concert is the one that caused quite afew Mancunians to start bands. Most notably Joy Division, who went on to become New Order and almost singlehandedly finance a record label, influencial night club and the "rave culture."
In America it's hard to understand this, because raves didn't really become mainstream until around 95-97 while in the UK raves were old hat by 89.
Also, a little band known as The Smiths ;) were supposedly there as well as the Buzzcocks.
I've said before that the 1980s acts are going to be hard for the RRHoF. Do they go with the alternative acts or the more popular metal acts? Personally I prefer the former more. But who knows what will happen?You left out The Fall. :)
But otherwise, nice job of answering a question probably not deserving of an answer.
Jason
11-30-05, 09:27 PM
That concert is the one that caused quite afew Mancunians to start bands. Most notably Joy Division, who went on to become New Order and almost singlehandedly finance a record label, influencial night club and the "rave culture."
In America it's hard to understand this, because raves didn't really become mainstream until around 95-97 while in the UK raves were old hat by 89.
Also, a little band known as The Smiths ;) were supposedly there as well as the Buzzcocks.
So, none of these bands would have been formed if it wasn't for the Sex Pistols?
Brain Stew
11-30-05, 09:33 PM
So, none of these bands would have been formed if it wasn't for the Sex Pistols?
Supposedly. That is essentially what is said in the movie 24 Hour Party People.
Jason
11-30-05, 09:39 PM
What bands have been influenced by Kiss have been good? Seriously.
Hundreds of them, but you're no more interested in them or what they have to say than I am in the Tits or any other no-talent (your words, not mine) punk band.
B5Erik
11-30-05, 11:14 PM
What bands have been influenced by Kiss have been good? Seriously.
Are you really that ignorant? Or is it just arrogant?
I listed a few before - including Pearl Jam, Soundgarden, Stone Temple Pilots, Anthrax, Garth Brooks...Tons of bands have been influenced by KISS in one way or another, and the list of bands whose guitar players first picked up a guitar because of KISS is HUGE. You may not like KISS, but to even try to deny their impact on Rock and Roll is just plain ignorant.
Obviously, from your dismissal of their live performances, you have never seen them live. The power and specacle of a live KISS show was unequalled in the 70's, and their shows in the 80's and 90's were high energy extravaganzas. Some people - millions, actually - also think that they've written and recorded quite a few Rock and Metal classics.
Have you even heard songs like "100,000 Years," "Deuce," "Strutter," "Black Diamond," or "Firehouse?" And those are just off of their first album.
While KISS may not have been the first band to run around on stage, the were (as I noted on a previous post) one of the first. In fact, by the time they were playing their first live gigs in 1973 the laid back California approach was in vogue (Doobie Brothers, Eagles, etc). Just stand there and play - no stage show, no energy expended by the band, just kick back and play. Some people like that, others find it boring in a live concert environment. KISS found it boring, so they took everything over the top in a blitzkrieg of Rock and Roll - both visual and aural.
Hell, like it or not, KISS influenced 90% of the bands in the L.A. Metal scene of the 80's. Motley Crue, Ratt, Poison, etc, all owed a lot of their styles to KISS in one way or another. (Hell, if you look at the back cover of Motley Crue's Too Fast for Love album they look like KISS Lite.)
You don't have to bash other musical styles to promote and hail the one(s) you like. You can have KISS AND the Sex Pistols in the same hall, you know. They both were influential, and they both made one hell of a mark on Rock and Roll.
There's a stronger argument against the Pistols, though, in that they self destructed almost before they began, and their flame burned out within a year. There is a very strong argument that a one album career shouldn't get you in the Hall of Fame. Obviously, the voters for the Hall disagreed and put the Pistols in. That's fine, but to exclude bands of obvious success and influence just because the voters don't like them is snobbery at it's worst - and the antithesis of Rock and Roll.
atlantamoi
12-01-05, 09:37 AM
What bands have been influenced by Kiss have been good? Seriously. The Replacements covered "Black Diamond" on "Let It Be". Damn good cover. Kiss should be in to me, no doubt. I don't really even think it's a question or not. Of course, I detest Kiss in almost every way after their first few albums.
Numanoid
12-01-05, 09:52 AM
B5Erik, I think you need to investigate a musical genre called "glam rock" before giving all that credit to KISS.
nodeerforamonth
12-01-05, 12:20 PM
You left out The Fall. :)
Shane McGowan of the Pogues was also at those Sex Pistols shows.
Both KISS and the Sex Pistols are more than deserving of being in the Hall Of Fame. Both were extremely influential. Both created great music.
nodeerforamonth
12-01-05, 12:22 PM
Why? Because it's one of the few shows they bothered to actually perform at?
"bothered"? They were BANNED! They didn't play clubs under assumed names to be "cool", they did it out of necessity!
When "God Save The Queen" hit "#1", the papers didn't even list a "#1" record that week!
Jason
12-01-05, 06:24 PM
There's a stronger argument against the Pistols, though, in that they self destructed almost before they began, and their flame burned out within a year. There is a very strong argument that a one album career shouldn't get you in the Hall of Fame. Obviously, the voters for the Hall disagreed and put the Pistols in. That's fine, but to exclude bands of obvious success and influence just because the voters don't like them is snobbery at it's worst - and the antithesis of Rock and Roll.
Well said.
B5Erik
12-01-05, 09:35 PM
B5Erik, I think you need to investigate a musical genre called "glam rock" before giving all that credit to KISS.
KISS wasn't really a "glam" band. They were something way outside what those bands were doing. "Glam" of the early 70's featured a very androgynous look and the music was very poppy (kind of a precursor to the late 70's power pop).
KISS looked tough, mean, and scary. Not androgynous (well, there was Paul...). There was no glam equivalent to Gene Simmons. He was Alice Cooper meets Godzilla. Musically, KISS was closer to British bands like The Who, The Move, The Rolling Stones, The Beatles, Led Zeppelin, and Black Sabbath (all big influences on KISS' musical style) than the Glam bands of the early 70's.
KISS didn't invent a whole lot, but neither did Nirvana or The Sex Pistols, or Blondie, or The Rolling Stones for that matter. They just took what was out there, made it bigger, and combined elements that hadn't been combined before. It was this combination that made them stand out from the other bands.
Alice Cooper was a huge influence on KISS, but even so, their stage shows were not very similar. Alice & Company went for the off-Broadway theatrics; KISS went high tech with pyrotechnics and hydraulic lifts. Alice used make-up around his eyes; KISS used Kabuki whiteface and came up with even bigger identifying make-up designs around their eyes. Alice wore boots; KISS wore Slade-esque platforms. Everything with KISS was bigger and bolder. It's up to the individual to decide if that means better or not.
But to dismiss KISS, a band that has had such an enormous impact on the world of Rock and Roll either indicates someone being blinded by personal tastes, or sheer ignorance. (Which, when it comes to KISS, may truly be bliss for some.)
Notice that I'm not saying that bands that KISS critics/detractors have championed should not be in the Hall of Fame, just that KISS and others should ALSO be in for all that they accomplished.
It would be like the Pro Football Hall Of Fame NOT inducting Emmitt Smith because he was never the "best" running back while he played - always 2nd or 3rd best (to Barry Sanders, etc). In the end, Smith retired as the #1 running back of all time based on total yardage, and he will be a first ballot hall of famer.
KISS has more Gold albums than any other American band. They also had a ton of their albums certified Platinum. This wasn't just over a 5 year period, but over 25 years - and if they ever put out a new studio album in the future it may well reach Gold status as well.
I've listed several well respected bands who were influenced by KISS, I've explained how their live stage shows changed Rock and Roll concert presentations forever, and the fact that they have had a 30+ year career is just the icing on the cake.
It's a joke that they weren't inducted in 2000.
KISS, Rush, Deep Purple, Van Halen, Iron Maiden, Judas Priest, Metallica - these are all bands that should go in over the next 5 years alongside bands of different Rock sub-genres that have been mentioned on this thread.
If they don't then the Hall will continue to be a joke to a hell of a lot of people.
Brain Stew
12-02-05, 01:09 AM
KISS certainly needs to be in the hall. I think this and I am an alternative fan.
As for Deep Purple or Rush, I'm not sure ;)...
mike harnish
12-02-05, 11:00 AM
KISS?! Weren't they the inspiration for Spinal Tap? Sure could've been, anyway.
Chrisedge
12-02-05, 11:17 AM
KISS, Rush, Deep Purple, Van Halen, Iron Maiden, Judas Priest and Metallica ALL COMPLETELY deserve to be in. If you think not, you need to look and see who is been already inducted.
Here is the complete list:
1986
performers
Chuck Berry
James Brown
Ray Charles
Sam Cooke
Fats Domino
The Everly Brothers
Buddy Holly
Jerry Lee Lewis
Elvis Presley
Little Richard
early influences
Robert Johnson
Jimmie Rodgers
Jimmy Yancey
lifetime achievement
John Hammond
non-performers
Alan Freed
Sam Phillips
1987
performers
The Coasters
Eddie Cochran
Bo Diddley
Aretha Franklin
Marvin Gaye
Bill Haley
B. B. King
Clyde McPhatter
Ricky Nelson
Roy Orbison
Carl Perkins
Smokey Robinson
Big Joe Turner
Muddy Waters
Jackie Wilson
early influences
Louis Jordan
T-Bone Walker
Hank Williams
non-performers
Leonard Chess
Ahmet Ertegun
Jerry Leiber and Mike Stoller
Jerry Wexler
1988
performers
The Beach Boys
The Beatles
The Drifters
Bob Dylan
The Supremes
early influences
Woody Guthrie
Lead Belly
Les Paul
non-performers
Berry Gordy, Jr
1989
performers
Dion
Otis Redding
The Rolling Stones
The Temptations
Stevie Wonder
early influences
The Inkspots
Bessie Smith
The Soul Stirrers
non-performers
Phil Spector
1990
performers
Hank Ballard
Bobby Darin
The Four Seasons
The Four Tops
The Kinks
The Platters
Simon and Garfunkel
The Who
early influences
Louis Armstrong
Charlie Christian
Ma Rainey
non-performers
Gerry Goffin and Carole King
Holland, Dozier and Holland
1991
performers
LaVern Baker
The Byrds
John Lee Hooker
The Impressions
Wilson Pickett
Jimmy Reed
Ike and Tina Turner
early influences
Howlin' Wolf
lifetime achievement
Nesuhi Ertegun
non-performers
Dave Bartholomew
Ralph Bass
1992
performers
Bobby "Blue" Bland
Booker T. and the M.G.'s
Johnny Cash
The Isley Brothers
The Jimi Hendrix Experience
Sam and Dave
The Yardbirds
early influences
Elmore James
Professor Longhair
non-performers
Leo Fender
Bill Graham
Doc Pomus
1993
performers
Ruth Brown
Cream
Creedence Clearwater Revival
The Doors
Frankie Lymon and the Teenagers
Etta James
Van Morrison
Sly and the Family Stone
early influences
Dinah Washington
non-performers
Dick Clark
Milt Gabler
1994
performers
The Animals
The Band
Duane Eddy
The Grateful Dead
Elton John
John Lennon
Bob Marley
Rod Stewart
early influences
Willie Dixon
non-performers
Johnny Otis
1995
performers
The Allman Brothers Band
Al Green
Janis Joplin
Led Zeppelin
Martha and the Vandellas
Neil Young
Frank Zappa
early influences
The Orioles
non-performers
Paul Ackerman
1996
performers
David Bowie
Gladys Knight and the Pips
Jefferson Airplane
Little Willie John
Pink Floyd
The Shirelles
The Velvet Underground
early influences
Pete Seeger
non-performers
Tom Donahue
1997
performers
The (Young) Rascals
The Bee Gees
Buffalo Springfield
Crosby, Stills and Nash
The Jackson Five
Joni Mitchell
Parliament-Funkadelic
early influences
Mahalia Jackson
Bill Monroe
non-performers
Syd Nathan
1998
performers
The Eagles
Fleetwood Mac
The Mamas and the Papas
Lloyd Price
Santana
Gene Vincent
early influences
Jelly Roll Morton
non-performers
Allen Toussaint
1999
performers
Billy Joel
Curtis Mayfield
Paul McCartney
Del Shannon
Dusty Springfield
Bruce Springsteen
The Staple Singers
early influences
Bob Wills and His Texas Playboys
Charles Brown
non-performers
George Martin
2000
performers
Eric Clapton
Earth, Wind & Fire
Lovin' Spoonful
The Moonglows
Bonnie Raitt
James Taylor
early influences
Nat "King" Cole
Billie Holiday
sidemen
Hal Blaine
King Curtis
James Jamerson
Scotty Moore
Earl Palmer
non-performers
Clive Davis
2001
performers
Aerosmith
Solomon Burke
The Flamingos
Michael Jackson
Queen
Paul Simon
Steely Dan
Ritchie Valens
sidemen
James Burton
Johnnie Johnson
non-performers
Chris Blackwell
2002
performers
Isaac Hayes
Brenda Lee
Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers
Gene Pitney
Ramones
Talking Heads
sidemen
Chet Atkins
non-performers
Jim Stewart
2003
performers
AC/DC
The Clash
Elvis Costello & the Attractions
The Police
Righteous Brothers
sidemen
Benny Benjamin
Floyd Cramer
Steve Douglas
non-performers
Mo Ostin
2004
performers
Jackson Browne
The Dells
George Harrison
Prince
Bob Seger
Traffic
ZZ Top
lifetime achievement
Jann S. Wenner
2005
performers
Buddy Guy
The O'Jays
The Pretenders
Percy Sledge
U2
lifetime achievement
Frank Barsalona
Seymour Stein
nodeerforamonth
12-02-05, 01:01 PM
KISS?! Weren't they the inspiration for Spinal Tap? Sure could've been, anyway.
ALL bands were the inspiration for Spinal Tap. If I had a nickel for every band that claimed in an interview that "Spinal Tap could've been written about our band", I'd be a very wealthy man.
mike harnish
12-03-05, 10:53 AM
Yes, but, frankly, I meant the Spinal Tap comparison as an insult. Spinal Tap is a parody, a joke, and, to me, so is KISS. But, then, to each his/her own.
Jason
12-03-05, 02:29 PM
But, then, to each his/her own.
No no no no no. How can the Internet continue to function if people are allowed to have their own opinions?
nodeerforamonth
12-03-05, 02:46 PM
Yes, but, frankly, I meant the Spinal Tap comparison as an insult. Spinal Tap is a parody, a joke, and, to me, so is KISS. But, then, to each his/her own.
Keep in mind you are replying to a guy who has a knob that goes to "11" tattooed on his arm!
B5Erik
12-03-05, 03:26 PM
Yes, but, frankly, I meant the Spinal Tap comparison as an insult. Spinal Tap is a parody, a joke, and, to me, so is KISS. But, then, to each his/her own.
You know what I've found? Most people who think KISS is a joke tend not to have heard much of their music - especially their early stuff from before they hit it big. It's a real combination of American and British hard rock styles - kind of a Mid-Atlantic sound if you will. Seriously, If you like The Stones, or Zeppelin, or The Who, etc, I'd check out songs like "100,000 Years," "Watchin' You," "Deuce," "Hotter Than Hell," and "Black Diamond," - or if you like more modern grunge and heavy alternative music try their mid 90's stuff - "Jungle," "Master and Slave," "Rain," "Hate," and "Childhood's End," before passing final judgment. (Especially "Childhood's End," as I think it would be a revelation for a lot of people.)
But I appreciate your willingness to accept that different people have different tastes and that it's OK to like different bands and champion their causes. Which is why if after listening to those songs listed above you still thought KISS was a joke I'd still think your opinion was valid. Hell, especially after listening to those songs if you still had that opinion I'd say, "To each his or her own," since at that point you would have listened to what I consider to be some of KISS' best material.
Too many people hear "Rock and Roll All Nite" a zillion times on the radio and think that's all there is to KISS - which couldn't be farther from the truth.
Josh-da-man
12-03-05, 03:30 PM
Does Spinal Tap have a shot at getting put in the RARHOF?
I think they should; they'll be eligible in '09 won't they?
The Infidel
12-03-05, 04:11 PM
Rush was mentioned a couple times on this page, and I agree they should be in the HOF. Hell, they should have already been in! There's a ton of reasons all going through my head, but the one that comes up first is pure and simple influence. Rush made a career out of doing it their own way, every time, on every album. Because of a lack of radio play in their early years, they built a huge following on two things: word of mouth, and the sheer power of their music. Rush's style may not have influenced other artists/bands like more popular artists from years past, but maintaining that style has kept them as a unique force in a world of corporate cardboard cutout rock. You also can't deny the individual influence its members have had on young musicians the last couple decades. What bass player or drummer can honestly say they weren't influenced on their respective instruments by Geddy Lee or Neil Peart?
A loyal following, second only to perhaps the Grateful Dead (and perhaps the KISS Army), has spoken:
"Let Rush in."
Applejack
12-03-05, 04:35 PM
You know what I've found? Most people who think KISS is a joke tend not to have heard much of their music - especially their early stuff from before they hit it big. It's a real combination of American and British hard rock styles - kind of a Mid-Atlantic sound if you will. Seriously, If you like The Stones, or Zeppelin, or The Who, etc, I'd check out songs like "100,000 Years," "Watchin' You," "Deuce," "Hotter Than Hell," and "Black Diamond," - or if you like more modern grunge and heavy alternative music try their mid 90's stuff - "Jungle," "Master and Slave," "Rain," "Hate," and "Childhood's End," before passing final judgment. (Especially "Childhood's End," as I think it would be a revelation for a lot of people.)
Most people who really hate kiss really haven't listened to them that much, and most of the hate directed towards them (in my opinion anyway) is more because of Gene's constant commercialization of the band and trying to put their name on everything. Combine that with the fact that they have tried to get in on nearly every pop trend in the past 30 years (Disco= Dynasty) (90s grunge = Carnival of Souls), and people just can't stand them.
IMO, they should be in there for Love Gun/Rock & Roll Over/ Kiss/ Destroyer and Alive I. Those albums are all pretty good.
Other than that, IMO, they are pretty hit and miss, with mostly miss (I hate all of the solo albums, Dynasty, Unmasked, and The Elder) and the other albums are decent/mediocre to poor for the most part IMO.
I do, however, think that Revenge is one of their better albums in the past 20 years or so
They deserve to be in, but they aren't a very exciting choice for most people. Most people who haven't heard much of Kiss' catalog should at least listen to Double Platinum if nothing else.
Jason
12-03-05, 05:13 PM
IMO, they should be in there for Love Gun/Rock & Roll Over/ Kiss/ Destroyer and Alive I. Those albums are all pretty good.
Most artists are like this. Black Sabbath aren't being inducted because of TYR or Seventh Star. They're being inducted for their first six albums.
B5Erik
12-04-05, 03:11 AM
Most artists are like this. Black Sabbath aren't being inducted because of TYR or Seventh Star. They're being inducted for their first six albums.
That's true. Still, I like TYR and Seventh Star. Good albums. Even better were The Eternal Idol and Cross Purposes. Sabbath (or, in many cases Tony Iommi carrying on the Sabbath name) put out several great albums once Ozzy was shown the door. Unfortunately, the line-up's constant upheaval badly hurt their credibility and the albums didn't sell well. Heaven and Hell and Mob Rules (the Dio era) are generally considered "classic" Sabbath albums by most fans these days.
With KISS their first 6 studio albums are their most highly regarded by a majority of fans - but each album had some really good songs, and some later albums were rock solid (Creatures of the Night, Lick It Up, Asylum, Revenge, Carnival of Souls). They were kind of like the Stones in this regard. Later albums were hit or miss with the fans (some liked them, others didn't).
It's funny how the people voting for the entrants to the hall pretty much tend to ignore the fans - the people that the music is for and about in the first place. They try to make something more significant out of Rock and Roll than was originally intended - after all, Rock and Roll IS "Whole Lotta Shakin' Goin' On," "Hound Dog," "Rock Around the Clock," "Johnny B. Goode," etc, not high art.