View Poll Results: Which do you prefer: X-Men or X-Men 2?
X-Men
18
20.22%
X-Men 2
74
83.15%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 89. You may not vote on this poll
X-men or X-men 2?
#1
X-men or X-men 2?
Now that the hype has long died down for X-Men 2, I ask you which is the better X-Men movie?
FX plays X-Men at least 5 times a week and somehow manage to watch it at least 3 times. So, last week I was sick of watching X-Men all the time and put in X-Men 2.
Wow, how disappointing. This movie was not nearly as good as I remembered. Sure, the Nightcrawler scene in the beginning is quite awesome but all that is negated (in fact most of the fight scenes are negated) when you learn that Brian Cox has these mutants under a silly spell. Which is where I believe the movie is at it's biggest fault. That whole storyline with Stryker controlling the mutants fails so many times. Basically, there aren't any "bad" mutants in the movie only 1 bad guy who controls all of them. Which in my mind undermines the entire film. Also, the first movie focused on Wolverine and Rogue. X-Men 2 kinda puts Rogue in the background as they focus more on the story and attempt to flesh out a Wolverine back story.
IMO, X-Men is far superior to X-Men 2. It's no masterpiece but it has character and heart and a less of a ridiculous plot.
FX plays X-Men at least 5 times a week and somehow manage to watch it at least 3 times. So, last week I was sick of watching X-Men all the time and put in X-Men 2.
Wow, how disappointing. This movie was not nearly as good as I remembered. Sure, the Nightcrawler scene in the beginning is quite awesome but all that is negated (in fact most of the fight scenes are negated) when you learn that Brian Cox has these mutants under a silly spell. Which is where I believe the movie is at it's biggest fault. That whole storyline with Stryker controlling the mutants fails so many times. Basically, there aren't any "bad" mutants in the movie only 1 bad guy who controls all of them. Which in my mind undermines the entire film. Also, the first movie focused on Wolverine and Rogue. X-Men 2 kinda puts Rogue in the background as they focus more on the story and attempt to flesh out a Wolverine back story.
IMO, X-Men is far superior to X-Men 2. It's no masterpiece but it has character and heart and a less of a ridiculous plot.
#4
DVD Talk Legend
Well, there were actually only two mutants being controlled by Stryker (three if you count his son), and he didn't even control Magneto after he broke out of prison, so I don't think that counts as "all of them". They also made sure during X2 that you knew the bad guys were still bad. They worked together with the X-Men until they absolutely didn't have to any more, they grabbed Pyro, and blew the heck out of there.
I'm glad they got the Wolverine story out of the way; they focused pretty heavy on it in both movies, the first movie being more flashbacks than actual explanation. If they're making a third movie, this will leave them room to focus on someone else, like Jean returning.
As far as plots and character development, I think they did as well as they could to keep a good balance of story and effects. After all, they're comic book movies.
I'm glad they got the Wolverine story out of the way; they focused pretty heavy on it in both movies, the first movie being more flashbacks than actual explanation. If they're making a third movie, this will leave them room to focus on someone else, like Jean returning.
As far as plots and character development, I think they did as well as they could to keep a good balance of story and effects. After all, they're comic book movies.
#7
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Originally Posted by dadaluholla
X2 is much much better in my opinion.
Probably the best Marvel film to date.
Probably the best Marvel film to date.
#8
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally Posted by PopcornTreeCt
Sure, the Nightcrawler scene in the beginning is quite awesome but all that is negated (in fact most of the fight scenes are negated) when you learn that Brian Cox has these mutants under a silly spell.
The first movie was good, but the second movie was better.
#10
Banned
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Right now, my location is DVDTalk, but then again, you should already know that, shouldn't you?
Posts: 6,364
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
X-MEN 2 by a country mile; the problem with the first was that it was edited way too rapidly; it gives the sense of miles of deleted footage on some cutting room floor. The second took the time necessary to tell a full, well-rounded story.
#12
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Another vote for X2 all the way. XMen laid the groundwork, but I agree the film feels short...as if its just 2.3rds a movie or an appetizer to them main course, X2.
X2 was the fully fleshed out, full on story and action sequences I wanted to see. And it was great fun. X2 all the way...though Xmen is still a solid film, and watching them together is good fun.
X2 was the fully fleshed out, full on story and action sequences I wanted to see. And it was great fun. X2 all the way...though Xmen is still a solid film, and watching them together is good fun.
#13
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Formerly known as Groucho AND Bandoman/Death Moans, Iowa
Posts: 18,295
Received 372 Likes
on
266 Posts
Originally Posted by nodeerforamonth
X-Men 2 had too much of a political message in it. Which dates the movie (or will date the movie).
#14
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Originally Posted by nodeerforamonth
X-Men 2 had too much of a political message in it. Which dates the movie (or will date the movie).
#15
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally Posted by cleaver
The book came out in the early 90s. I thought the movie had more to do with race than politics.