DVD Talk
Which Wonka? [Archive] - DVD Talk Forum
 
Best Sellers
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Santa Buddies
Buy: $29.99 $9.99
8.
9.
10.
Julie & Julia
Buy: $28.96 $9.99
DVD Blowouts
1.
2.
Cars [Blu-ray]
Buy: $34.99 $15.49
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Mad Men: Season 2
Buy: $49.98 $18.99
10.

PDA
DVD Reviews

View Full Version : Which Wonka?


auto
07-20-05, 03:11 PM
So, now that many of us have seen the film, which version of Willy Wonka do you prefer?

http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2004/12/09/willywonka_narrowweb__200x276.jpg http://www.filmhobbit.com/moviereviews/movie-images/news/reporters/wwonka2.jpg

animalmystic
07-20-05, 03:13 PM
OG Wilder>Depp :cool:

Goldberg74
07-20-05, 04:46 PM
http://www.filmhobbit.com/moviereviews/movie-images/news/reporters/wwonka2.jpg

:up:

Rogue588
07-20-05, 08:50 PM
Johnny who?

Matthew Chmiel
07-20-05, 09:09 PM
It's all about the Wilder.

Cornelius1047
07-20-05, 09:31 PM
I really love Gene Wilder as Willy Wonka, but my vote goes to Johnny Depp. In my opinion, he can do no wrong as an actor.

Well... we'll just forget all about The Astronaut's Wife.

K

Cameron
07-21-05, 01:04 AM
Wilder and shame on you 14 who voted otherwise






for shame

freshticles
07-21-05, 02:28 AM
Depp...because he was 'acting' or 'playing a character'...wilder was just gene wilder in that movie...and I'm sorry, but being a person who actually likes to read the the books movies are based on, that definitely does not mean gene wilder IS willy wonka...

PopcornTreeCt
07-21-05, 02:58 AM
Both played very different characters. Moreso than the numerous Batman incarnations we've had. While Johnny Depp is always good I would've preferred a more sarcastic cynical Wonka like Wilder played.

Giles
07-21-05, 09:54 AM
Both played very different characters. Moreso than the numerous Batman incarnations we've had. While Johnny Depp is always good I would've preferred a more sarcastic cynical Wonka like Wilder played.

but Johnny Depps wardrobe was so much more "hip" than Wilder's - those boots at the end, you go girl!

ShagMan
07-21-05, 10:28 AM
I voted for the Gene Wilder version.

Giles
07-21-05, 10:40 AM
Wilder may have been a better Wonka, but the overall film IMO is no where as good as the new 2005 version.

Rogue588
07-21-05, 11:31 AM
Depp...because he was 'acting' or 'playing a character'...wilder was just gene wilder in that movie...and I'm sorry, but being a person who actually likes to read the the books movies are based on, that definitely does not mean gene wilder IS willy wonka...Yeah, if only Gene had stuck with the fake teeth, the slightly higher pitched voice and "acted" more effeminate.

Hindsight 20/20 and all..

Shannon Nutt
07-21-05, 12:40 PM
This is a no-brainer...Depp may be the better actor, but Wilder embodied that character...it's the one he'll probably be most remembered for in his career.

movielib
07-21-05, 07:34 PM
Saw the new one last Sunday and watched the old one for the umpteenth time last night. While the new one is very good it lacks some of both the charm and biting edge of the original.

Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory - ****/****
Charlie and the Chocolate Factory - ***½/****

Gene Wilder - ****/****
Johnny Depp - ***½/****

mookyman
07-21-05, 07:37 PM
Gene Wilder, and that says a lot because I liked Johnny Depp before the kids were into Johnny Depp. But Gene Wilder is the author of my style.

mllefoo
07-21-05, 08:43 PM
I really love Gene Wilder as Willy Wonka, but my vote goes to Johnny Depp. In my opinion, he can do no wrong as an actor.

Well... we'll just forget all about The Astronaut's Wife.

K

Oh please. He's the only interesting thing about that cineschlock fest.

I have yet to see the new movie, but since I'd do Johnny Depp in a heartbeat, I'll pick his Willy Wonka over Gene Wilder.

Besides, as cuddly as Wilder was at the time, I never could stand the singing.

onebyone
07-21-05, 08:52 PM
I went with Johnny Depp's Wonka, but I have much love for them both.

Rogue588
07-22-05, 12:04 AM
I have yet to see the new movie, but since I'd do Johnny Depp in a heartbeat, I'll pick his Willy Wonka over Gene Wilder.:lol: Wow. Which head are you thinking with...?

Oh wait... ;) :p

Cornelius1047
07-22-05, 03:16 AM
Oh please. He's the only interesting thing about that cineschlock fest.

I'd also submit Secret Window as well. I'd agree that the only reason I own and would watch both is because of his presence. He's always a treat to watch, even in dreck like that.

K

NavinJohnson
07-22-05, 06:15 AM
Just caught the new one today. I liked it, but still enjoyed Wonka more (Wilder quoting poetry and all).

mllefoo
07-22-05, 10:37 AM
Has anyone ever noticed that in every movie Gene Wilder is in, he goes on some sort of monologue rampage where he starts off speaking sing-song dialogue in a halfway normal voice, and eventually winds up screaming his lines? He's kind of like a Dalek reciting Vogon Poetry.

DRG
07-22-05, 03:36 PM
Never cared for Wilder's performance. Too "Mary Poppins" for me.

auto
07-25-05, 12:32 PM
Looks like a landslide for Wilder.

darkhawk
07-25-05, 01:48 PM
Gene's a better Wonka but Charlie &TCF was better

Chew
07-26-05, 07:41 AM
The original gets my vote in both movie and character.

ianholm
07-26-05, 08:59 AM
Depp's

garmonbozia
07-31-05, 07:04 PM
Depp...because he was 'acting' or 'playing a character'...wilder was just gene wilder in that movie...and I'm sorry, but being a person who actually likes to read the the books movies are based on, that definitely does not mean gene wilder IS willy wonka...

I agree with this..... I was a big fan of the books as a child, and although I grew up watching the 71 film dozens of times......Gene Wilder was never creepy enough in the role for me. I thought Depp was much creepier and darker. Wonka was a sadistic bastard.......he's not meant to loveable, at least that's how I always read him as in the novel. so I really don't understand people's complaints in the "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" thread about Depp's Wonka not being likeable. He's not supposed to be likeable, at least not in any real way........but Depp's Wonka was a lot funnier.....and that's enough for me!

SpaceBoy
07-31-05, 09:20 PM
Wilder and the old version, it's not even a contest imho.

johnnysd
08-02-05, 01:33 AM
I think that the new film is one of the worst movies I have ever seen. I liked nothing about it. I thought it was creepy, and strange for the sake of being strange. Easily in my bottom 5 movies of all time. I hae disliked many movies in the past, but could see why someone liked it. I am totally baffled by anyone liking this completely awful film.

hdtv00
08-02-05, 03:57 AM
The new ones aweful compared to the wilder one. I could'nt stand ANY of the songs in the new one, and the umpa loompa in the new one, um ok. I almost go as far as the poster right before me.

tommyp007
08-02-05, 09:18 AM
This is a no-brainer...Depp may be the better actor, but Wilder embodied that character...it's the one he'll probably be most remembered for in his career.


ok.....but hello "Young Frankenstein"

The Bus
08-02-05, 09:38 AM
I haven't seen the new one simply because of how irritating Depp seemed in all the scenes. I'll still buy it when it comes out and see it then, but I figured I'd hedge my $15 bet and wait until the DVD release.