War Of The Worlds aspect ratio question
07-01-05, 09:44 AM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
War Of The Worlds aspect ratio question
I initially posted this on the main WOTW thread but as that is mainly about opinions of the film and this is kind of technical, thought it warranted a seperate post.
One question for you guys - I saw the movie here in the UK last night, and one thing that surprised me from the off was that it was not a widescreen scope print.
At first I thought that a little odd for this sort of movie, and for Spielberg. I wanted to know are all of the prints the same, ie was it shot in scope widescreen and some ordinary widescreen prints struck for certain territories - or did Spielberg just not shoot it in scope?
I must admit I tend to favor the latter, because I am sure Speilberg would excercise control over how the movie is presented, and it's possible he did not go for scope widescreen to try and preserve/emphasise the intimate, character based nature of the movie.
One question for you guys - I saw the movie here in the UK last night, and one thing that surprised me from the off was that it was not a widescreen scope print.
At first I thought that a little odd for this sort of movie, and for Spielberg. I wanted to know are all of the prints the same, ie was it shot in scope widescreen and some ordinary widescreen prints struck for certain territories - or did Spielberg just not shoot it in scope?
I must admit I tend to favor the latter, because I am sure Speilberg would excercise control over how the movie is presented, and it's possible he did not go for scope widescreen to try and preserve/emphasise the intimate, character based nature of the movie.
07-01-05, 10:01 AM
#2
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's 1.85:1 (Academy Flat). Confirmed by IMDB, for what it's worth.
Most of Spielberg's recent films have been shot in that ratio, except Minority Report (which he shot Super35). Yes, even Jurassic Park wasn't Scope-ratioed.
Both Spielberg and especially DP Janusz Kaminski prefer 1.85:1.
Most of Spielberg's recent films have been shot in that ratio, except Minority Report (which he shot Super35). Yes, even Jurassic Park wasn't Scope-ratioed.
Both Spielberg and especially DP Janusz Kaminski prefer 1.85:1.
07-01-05, 10:29 AM
#3
Moderator
Originally Posted by Grubert
Most of Spielberg's recent films have been shot in that ratio, except Minority Report (which he shot Super35). Yes, even Jurassic Park wasn't Scope-ratioed.
07-01-05, 11:20 AM
#4
DVD Talk Legend
Actually, the 1.85:1 is probably the better choice for this one, considering what needs to be shown. The total height of the tripods wouldn't be possible in 2.35:1 unless you really distanced the camera from them - and that would diminish their visual impact.
07-03-05, 03:57 PM
#7
DVD Talk Legend
In the decade, the only film Spielberg has shot in 2.35:1 was Minority Report. And that was shot in Super 35.
With the exception of his '70s films (Jaws, Close Encounters, and 1941), the Indiana Jones trilogy, and Hook; everything he has done has been 1.85:1.
With the exception of his '70s films (Jaws, Close Encounters, and 1941), the Indiana Jones trilogy, and Hook; everything he has done has been 1.85:1.
Last edited by Matthew Chmiel; 07-03-05 at 03:59 PM.
07-04-05, 04:01 AM
#8
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Matthew Chmiel
With the exception of his '70s films (Jaws, Close Encounters, and 1941), the Indiana Jones trilogy, and Hook; everything he has done has been 1.85:1.
