DVD Talk review of 'Tears of the Sun - Director's Extended Cut'
#1
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Thread Starter
DVD Talk review of 'Tears of the Sun - Director's Extended Cut'
I read Scott Weinberg's DVD review of Tears of the Sun - Director's Extended Cut at http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=16046 and...
Thanks for the review! Pretty disappointing that this release is only adding deleted backs into the movie and slapping the DC title on it. I was hoping for more on this one, but I guess not. Looks like I am going to skip double dipping on this one.
Thanks for the review! Pretty disappointing that this release is only adding deleted backs into the movie and slapping the DC title on it. I was hoping for more on this one, but I guess not. Looks like I am going to skip double dipping on this one.
#5
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Obviously, but I've never seen a re-issue as frivolous as this. Besides, who the hell is going to buy this? It wasn't a good movie and the people who liked it aren't likely to double dip. The people who know anything about DVDs know that it's worthless and likewise won't double dip.
#6
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Thread Starter
I just received my preorder copy since I could not cancel in time. But I have some observations that don't add up.
1. The back of the dvd says "24 minutes of Never-Before-Seen-Footage" so wouldn't the deleted scences be considered seen so their must be something new.
2. The old deleted scences only added up to a little over 17 minutes long so 7 minutes of new stuff must be on there.
3. This is the one that really does not add up. Running time on old one was 121 minutes, new one is 132. This is only 11 minute difference, so I would assume that stuff was deleted and then added.
So I am confused since the review says all they did was add the deleted stuff in. Is this considered never before seen footage? And what about the time differences?
1. The back of the dvd says "24 minutes of Never-Before-Seen-Footage" so wouldn't the deleted scences be considered seen so their must be something new.
2. The old deleted scences only added up to a little over 17 minutes long so 7 minutes of new stuff must be on there.
3. This is the one that really does not add up. Running time on old one was 121 minutes, new one is 132. This is only 11 minute difference, so I would assume that stuff was deleted and then added.
So I am confused since the review says all they did was add the deleted stuff in. Is this considered never before seen footage? And what about the time differences?
#8
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: toronto
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Big Worms
I just received my preorder copy since I could not cancel in time. But I have some observations that don't add up.
1. The back of the dvd says "24 minutes of Never-Before-Seen-Footage" so wouldn't the deleted scences be considered seen so their must be something new.
2. The old deleted scences only added up to a little over 17 minutes long so 7 minutes of new stuff must be on there.
3. This is the one that really does not add up. Running time on old one was 121 minutes, new one is 132. This is only 11 minute difference, so I would assume that stuff was deleted and then added.
So I am confused since the review says all they did was add the deleted stuff in. Is this considered never before seen footage? And what about the time differences?
1. The back of the dvd says "24 minutes of Never-Before-Seen-Footage" so wouldn't the deleted scences be considered seen so their must be something new.
2. The old deleted scences only added up to a little over 17 minutes long so 7 minutes of new stuff must be on there.
3. This is the one that really does not add up. Running time on old one was 121 minutes, new one is 132. This is only 11 minute difference, so I would assume that stuff was deleted and then added.
So I am confused since the review says all they did was add the deleted stuff in. Is this considered never before seen footage? And what about the time differences?
#9
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sand Point
Posts: 2,249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by natevines
Wow, I'm amazed at how egregious this is. Why the hell would Columbia do this?