Is CSI harming our legal system?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Virginia
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is CSI harming our legal system?
Interesting cover story in US News this week on the so called CSI Effect. Juries have unrealistic expectations in real life trials based on the TV show and end up acquitting people they probably shouldn't. Some of the examples in the story are kind of frightening.
I know when I tell people that the shows are in absolutely no way realistic, fans always say "... it's just a TV show. I know it isn't real ..." But I think most people actually believe that CSI reflects how crime labs and police work.
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/culture...0425/25csi.htm
I know when I tell people that the shows are in absolutely no way realistic, fans always say "... it's just a TV show. I know it isn't real ..." But I think most people actually believe that CSI reflects how crime labs and police work.
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/culture...0425/25csi.htm
#2
DVD Talk God
I hope so. There is no other system in as much need of harm as our legal system.
Honestly, I think they needed to find a story, and making one with something popular like CSI was a good way to sell magazines.
Honestly, I think they needed to find a story, and making one with something popular like CSI was a good way to sell magazines.
#3
DVD Talk Hero
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Bartertown due to it having a better economy than where I really live.
Posts: 29,834
Received 18 Likes
on
12 Posts
the DA mentioned CSI when I was going for jury duty. said there'd be a lot of lab type evidence (I guess to verify what drugs the guy was busted with) but that lab stuff wasn't as cool in real life as on csi
#5
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sand Point
Posts: 2,249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I read a story about the flip side of that coin, where defense attorneys were worried that juries would be quick to accept "scientific evidence" as hard proof because of CSI.
The OJ jurors would be just as stupid now as they were back then.
Originally Posted by Jeremy517
If the OJ trial were held now, he would probably be convicted. The prosecutors wouldn't have had to try to explain DNA evidence to the jurors.
#7
DVD Talk Hero
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Bartertown due to it having a better economy than where I really live.
Posts: 29,834
Received 18 Likes
on
12 Posts
tonight was an all time low in stupidity
running finger prints. the scanner scans them and they get a hit within 2 seconds
same with a DNA test they run, granted on the DNA they were running a female sample in a database of mostly males, so I suppose they could set the search to only check the female samples in the database and speed things up, but that's still way too fast
no wonder cops and DAs hate these shows
oh yeah, somehow the stitching on a guy's jeans left an imprint on a bumper
running finger prints. the scanner scans them and they get a hit within 2 seconds
same with a DNA test they run, granted on the DNA they were running a female sample in a database of mostly males, so I suppose they could set the search to only check the female samples in the database and speed things up, but that's still way too fast
no wonder cops and DAs hate these shows
oh yeah, somehow the stitching on a guy's jeans left an imprint on a bumper
#8
Cool New Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I always find the fingerprint matching pretty unrealistic. I love the computer software program that they run, and then most of the time the resulting finger print shows a 4 point match. From what I've read this would not be considered a match for a real court case.
#9
DVD Talk God
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Directionally Challenged (for DirecTV)
Posts: 130,270
Received 614 Likes
on
493 Posts
Originally Posted by Jeremy517
If the OJ trial were held now, he would probably be convicted. The prosecutors wouldn't have had to try to explain DNA evidence to the jurors.
I've always thought the same.
As the article suggests, I think CSI has a neutral effect. It may be helpful to prosecuters in some instances and it may be helpful to defendants in others.
#13
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Sesame Street (the apt. next to Bob's)
Posts: 20,195
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Originally Posted by kvrdave
Honestly, I think they needed to find a story, and making one with something popular like CSI was a good way to sell magazines.
#14
In a way, I can see the validity in this obviously sensationalistic argument by virtue of the fact that the American public is an easily swayed flock of sheep. But BDLU said it best when he said that juries vote on their own emotion. After the Scott Peterson trial, multiple jurors claimed that they recommended the death penalty because "he didn't show any emotion." Not saying he's not guilty or deserving or whatever, but if that's not ridiculous, I don't know what is. My faith in our legal system is almost beyond repair now.