DVD Talk
Blair confirms May 5 election [Archive] - DVD Talk Forum
 
Best Sellers
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
DVD Blowouts
1.
2.
3.
4.
300 [Blu-ray]
Buy: $34.99 $22.95
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

PDA
DVD Reviews

View Full Version : Blair confirms May 5 election


wendersfan
04-05-05, 09:01 AM
<b><a href = "http://uk.news.yahoo.com/050405/325/ffozi.html">Blair confirms May 5 election</a></b>

LONDON (Reuters) - Tony Blair has confirmed the worst-kept secret in politics -- that an election will be held on May 5 -- as polls suggest a real contest for the first time since 1992.

With Iraq weighing heavily on his ratings, Blair put his government's economic credentials at the heart of the campaign.

Confirming the date after visiting the Queen in traditional pre-election protocol, Blair vowed to build on eight years of growth to entrench future investment in public services -- which he says the Conservatives will slash.

"It's a big choice, it's a big decision. The British people are the boss and they are the ones that will make it," he told reporters outside Downing Street.

Blair had delayed the long-expected announcement by a day due to the death at the weekend of Pope John Paul.

Public anger over the Iraq war could slash Blair's parliamentary majority -- five new opinion polls showed his party has lost support to the Conservatives.

Embarrassingly, one of the Labour party's candidates, Stephen Wilkinson, said on Tuesday he was defecting to the Liberal Democrats, the only major party to oppose the Iraq war.

"Who would have thought a Labour government would become a lap dog to George Bush's right wing Republican administration," Wilkinson said.

Conservative leader Michael Howard focused on Blair's perceived Achilles Heel -- reduced public trust post-Iraq.

"The choice before voters on May 5 is very clear," he told party supporters. "They can either reward Mr Blair for eight years of broken promises ... or they can vote Conservative.

REAL CONTEST

Surveys in Tuesday's Guardian, Times and Independent gave Labour a lead of just two or three percentage points. Separate surveys of voters who said they would definitely vote even gave the Conservatives a lead.

If those figures were replicated on polling day, analysts say, Blair would still win a third term but with a much looser grip on parliament. At the previous two elections in 1997 and 2001, Blair easily won triple-digit majorities.

The country's electoral map, which concentrates constituencies in Labour's urban strongholds, means the Conservatives must win a larger share of the vote than Labour to take power.

The Financial Times said the 5-point Conservative lead in its poll of definite voters would still return Blair to power but with a parliamentary majority slashed from 161 seats to just 27.

If he wins, Blair would make history by becoming the first Labour premier to clinch a third consecutive term, equalling the record of Margaret Thatcher.

Blair came to power in 1997 after the 1992 vote, which Labour had been widely expected to win, swung to the Conservatives at the last minute.

If Blair's power is weakened this time, he could quickly become a lame duck as he has already stated he will not seek a fourth term.

The biggest fear of Labour strategists, mirroring the polling evidence, is that their core supporters do not bother to turn out.

Blair will visit a key marginal constituency later on Tuesday to ram home that point.

Red Dog
04-05-05, 09:04 AM
I just want Blair to win and Michael Howard continue to lead the Tories. Watching those 2 go at it each week during PM Questions is comedy gold.

wendersfan
04-05-05, 09:07 AM
I just want Blair to win and Michael Howard continue to lead the Tories. Watching those 2 go at it each week during PM Questions is comedy gold.When political theorists argue that people should support candidates that represent the voter's best interest I don't think you were what they had in mind. :lol:

<b>Red Dog</b>, the self-interested voter:

Bush victory = gambling winnings
Blair victory = Sunday night TV comedy

But hey, whatever works! :up:

classicman2
04-05-05, 09:44 AM
If Howard should win, they still would go at it.

It might even be more entertaining, because the leader of the Liberal Democrats in Parliament, whose name escapes me, would join in more because they are more akin to Labour than they are to the Torries, & I believe he is not too fond of Mr. Howard.

Howard is a funny man, though. And he doesn't look funny. ;)

Red Dog
04-05-05, 09:46 AM
If Howard should win, they still would go at it.

It might even be more entertaining, because the leader of the Liberal Democrats in Parliament, whose name escapes me, would join in more because they are more akin to Labour than they are to the Torries, & I believe he is not too fond of Mr. Howard.

Howard is a funny man, though. And he doesn't look funny. ;)


Really? I would think Blair would lose his status as head of the party if they were to lose control, but then again I don't know much about the process.

If true, that would be pretty cool, although I would think Howard is more entertaining when on the offensive.

classicman2
04-05-05, 09:55 AM
You're right. Although I don't believe Labour would kick him out of the position as leader of the loyal opposition immediately - later, probably. Blair might just remove himself, however.

Does anyone else think Howard has an evil-impish like grin? ;)

BrianYuen
04-05-05, 05:43 PM
he kinda looks scary.

lol

Halloween Costume of him

Ranger
04-11-05, 06:13 PM
Wow, Howard was totally on the offensive last night.

"Taxes? UP!
Immigration? UP!
Waiting time? UP!

Pension? DOWN!
Worker productivity? DOWN!
Broken promises... BROKEN PROMISES!

In the words of the chancellar, why should we ever believe him again?"