Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Archives > Archives > DVD Talk Archive
Reload this Page >

Knife in the water(criterion) question

Community
Search

Knife in the water(criterion) question

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-26-04, 12:26 PM
  #1  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Knife in the water(criterion) question

Hey everyone, I recently purchased Knife in the water (criterion collection) on dvd and noticed I couldnt fast forward through the chapters but could only skip to the next chapter. Is this the case for that particular dvd or is mine messed up?
flee is offline  
Old 07-26-04, 01:10 PM
  #2  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Lower Appalachia
Posts: 2,909
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'm pretty sure I have read that the fast-forward was disabled at Polanski's request. I don't have a link handy but if I find one I will post it, or others may have more info.

edit:
Found one ... there are probably lots more.

http://cinenikki.gamenikki.com/Pages...ionCollection/

Roman Polanski was heavily involved in the production of the set (which is great), but he demanded that the fast forward and rewinding features be disabled, so the film could be watched as intended.

Last edited by obscurelabel; 07-26-04 at 01:13 PM.
obscurelabel is offline  
Old 07-26-04, 01:11 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have it at home, but I can't check until later this evening. If someone doesn't post anything by then, I'll give it a spin and let you know.
Nagheenanajar is offline  
Old 07-26-04, 01:18 PM
  #4  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow, that's dumb...
natevines is offline  
Old 07-26-04, 01:37 PM
  #5  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Times Square
Posts: 12,135
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by natevines
Wow, that's dumb...

I assume you mean that wanting to fast-forward and/or skip scenes in a well-crafted and deliberately paced highly-acclaimed work of art is dumb.
marty888 is offline  
Old 07-26-04, 02:14 PM
  #6  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This sucks! There's nothing I enjoy more at the theater than telling the projectionist to double-time it through those slower sections. Suspense-schmuspense!
Richard Malloy is offline  
Old 07-26-04, 03:28 PM
  #7  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Posts: 17,200
Received 849 Likes on 592 Posts
Originally posted by Richard Malloy
This sucks! There's nothing I enjoy more at the theater than telling the projectionist to double-time it through those slower sections. Suspense-schmuspense!
So I guess we should try to emulate the whole theatre experience in our home then. Screaming kids, sticky floors, people kicking the back of your seat, etc.

Life gets in the way of watching a film sometimes.
Some people watch part of the film and get interrupted, only to continue the next day. Some missed a piece of dialog or the subtitles go by too quickly - and need to rewind a bit to pick up the piece they missed.

Just because we didn't have the option available to us in the theatres, doesn't mean we shouldn't have it available to us at home.
Coral is offline  
Old 07-26-04, 03:35 PM
  #8  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Docking Bay 94
Posts: 14,259
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by marty888
I assume you mean that wanting to fast-forward and/or skip scenes in a well-crafted and deliberately paced highly-acclaimed work of art is dumb.
Ever miss a line of dialog? Ever want to go back and rewatch a particular sequence in this 'work of art'? Ever watch a movie and have the phone ring and/or someone in the next room ask you a question, interrupting the experience? Ever accidentally fall asleep for a minute or two and have to back up?

Watching movies at home is NOT the same as a theater. That's why we have Rew/FF in the first place. There are many uses of these features other than skipping scenes or FF through the 'slow parts'.

I'm all for directors intent and such, but disabling standard home video controls that have been around for decades is pretty silly.
bboisvert is offline  
Old 07-28-04, 02:39 AM
  #9  
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Knife in the Water (Criterion)

It was definitely at Polanski's request. I can easily see why after viewing the film. Skipping ahead wouldn't build the tension and suspense as successfully as taking in the film as he intended. We would fail to see how the characters change and why they're motivated to act as they do. Sometimes we're too spoiled with our modern luxuries like fast-forward and chapter skip. Lynch did the same thing with the DVD release of Mulholland Dr. for many of the same reasons, and especially so the viewer wouldn't miss the clues alluded to in the introduction. That, and he didn't want you wearing a laser hole in the disc playing the lesbian scenes over and over.
celluloidbuff is offline  
Old 07-28-04, 03:01 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And Lynch's The Straight Story had no chapters. His reasoning: It's not a book, it isn't meant to be watched in pieces.
shawagg is offline  
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.