DVD Talk
When did they change the order of the Narnia books? [Archive] - DVD Talk Forum
 
Best Sellers
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
DVD Blowouts
1.
300 [Blu-ray]
Buy: $34.99 $22.95
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
24: Redemption
Buy: $26.98 $14.99
8.
24 - Season Six
Buy: $59.98 $19.99
9.
10.

PDA
DVD Reviews

View Full Version : When did they change the order of the Narnia books?


Nick Danger
03-26-04, 09:47 PM
When I was a kid, The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe was the introduction to Narnia, and The Magician's Nephew was a flashback.

Reading The Magian's Nephew first doesn't work as well. I actually put a lot of thought into that when I was a kid. Going into the wardrobe is a great beginning to a story. Putting the explanation ahead of the thrill kind of deadens it.

It's a little like playing The Godfather parts I and II in chronological order.

JasonF
03-26-04, 10:39 PM
They did it some time in the last 10-15 years. I agree with you; it's stupid to put them in chronological order. Fortunately, they're working on a big budget version of The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe, not The Magician's Nephew.

benedict
03-27-04, 05:45 AM
When Harper Collins took over the publication of the books in America, they decided to keep numbering the books, but on the recommendation of Lewis's stepson Douglas Gresham, they adopted the order that follows Narnian Chronology.... This is also the order followed by the current British editions, published by Fontana Lions. Maybe I'm being unfair but it seems to me that Douglas Gresham is what we would term "a bit of a smart-arse".

benedict
03-27-04, 05:54 AM
The issue of reading order has been debated for decades, as the chronology of Narnia is inconsistent with the order in which the books were written. Gresham had actually posed this question to Lewis himself. "He personally preferred that they be read in the order in which he designed them . . . not necessarily the order in which he wrote them or published them. Which is why, as a consultant, I suggested that they number the books in the order in which Jack wanted them read, Narnian chronology. That has created an enormous furor, lots of arguments and discussions . . . which I think is utterly pathetic," he laughs.....carefully avoiding explaining what exactly is meant by "the order in which he designed them" and trampling over his step-father's work.

benedict
03-27-04, 06:02 AM
As far as it can be ascertained here is the order in which C.S.Lewis wrote The Chronicles of Narnia:
The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe
The Lefay Fragment (abandoned attempt at The Magicians Nephew)
Prince Caspian
The Voyage of the Dawn Treader
The Horse and His Boy
The Silver Chair
The Magicians Nephew (Draft 1)
The Last Battle
The Magicians Nephew (Draft 2)
For more information on the development of the Chronicles below is a chronology charting when C.S.Lewis wrote each book:
<TABLE BORDER><TR><TD><B>DATE</B></TD><TD><B>EVENT</B></TD></TR><TR><TD WIDTH=20%>Summer 1948</TD><TD>C.S.Lewis begins writing <I>The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe</I></TD></TR><TR><TD>10 March 1949</TD><TD>C.S.Lewis read Roger Lancelyn Green the first two chapters of <I>The Lion</I></TD></TR><TR><TD>14 June 1949</TD><TD>Lewis reads the first two chapters of <B>The Lefay Fragment</B> to Green</TD></TR><TR><TD>Dec 1949</TD><TD>Green reads the completed manuscript of <I>Prince Caspian</></TD></TR><TR><TD>Feb 1950</TD>
<TD>Green reads the completed manuscript of <I>The Voyage of the 'Dawn Treader'</I></TD></TR><TR><TD>22 June 1950</TD>
<TD>The Inklings given proofs of the <I>Lion</I></TD></TR>
<TR><TD>26 July 1950</TD><TD>Green reads the completed manuscript of <I>The Horse and His Boy</I></TD></TR>
<TR><TD>13 Nov 1950</TD><TD>Lewis completes the first few chapters of <I>The Silver Chair</I></TD></TR><TR><TD>March 1951</TD><TD>Roger Lancelyn Green reads the completed version of <I>The Silver Chair</I></TD></TR><TR><TD>May-June 1951</TD><TD>At least half of <I>The Magicians Nephew</I> completed</TD></TR><TR><TD>Oct-Nov 1951</TD>
<TD>Three-quarters of <I>The Magicians Nephew</I> completed</TD></TR><TR><TD>Feb 1953</TD><TD>Green reads the first half of <I>The Last Battle</I></TD></TR><TR>
<TD>11 March 1953</TD><TD>C.S.Lewis wrote to his publisher <I>Geoffrey Bles</I> to say 'You will hear with mixed feelings that I have just finished the seventh and really the last of the Narnian stories.'</TD></TR><TR><TD>Feb 1954</TD><TD>Green reads the revised version of The Magicians Nephew</TD></TR></TABLE>

littlefuzzy
03-27-04, 12:40 PM
I personally like to read them in chronological order.

Seeker
03-27-04, 04:59 PM
The Lion Witch and the Wardrobe is always first for me - maybe just because I READ it first, but maybe that's how Lewis felt as well, writing them.

fumanstan
03-28-04, 07:00 PM
Wow, i didnt even realize that they went back and renumbered the books. Personally, i like the original order, but in the end i don't think its a big deal. Kind of reminds me of the order to watch Star Wars in :)

j123vt_99
03-30-04, 11:47 AM
i don't remember the books too well, but doesn't the lion, witch wardrobe introduce us to the "narnia world" ... the other ones would just throw you into that world without any introduction

chanster
03-30-04, 04:46 PM
i don't remember the books too well, but doesn't the lion, witch wardrobe introduce us to the "narnia world" ... the other ones would just throw you into that world without any introduction

No the Magician's Nephew is a similar story of humans entering a parallel world (it was actually pre-Narnia)

I don't know who renumbered it, but its a tragedy. Lion should be first.

Verbal Gorilla
03-30-04, 09:08 PM
I see that almost everyone's reasons for reading them in chrnological order deal with The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe. I have yet to come across any reasons for reading the others out of order with the exception of "that is the way Lewis intended". I am very familar with Lesis' "popular" philosophy and want to read these, but I am leaning toward starting with The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe and then proceedging in chronological order after that.

Anyone have an opinion on this? Thanks.

GoVegan
03-31-04, 08:30 PM
I haven't read them in a while, but you're right, my major concern is with the placement of the Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe. I think that one should definitely be read first. Even if C.S. Lewis thinks they should be read in chronological order, that one was clearly written first. There are some parts in later books which are sort of "reveals" when reading them in the original order, but they lose their significance otherwise.

Save Ferris
04-26-04, 01:33 PM
How on earth can you make them truly chronological without ripping pages out of 'Horse and his Boy' and inserting them before the ending of 'Lion Witch and Wardrobe' since these books overlap?

Nick Danger
04-27-04, 10:46 AM
I read the pages in chronological order.

Like I said, I put a lot of thought into it when I was a kid.

Rico Diablo
04-29-04, 12:17 PM
Originally posted by GoVegan
There are some parts in later books which are sort of "reveals" when reading them in the original order, but they lose their significance otherwise.
Exactly. TLTWATW should be read first. This order gives the reader the opportunity to make the connections themselves rather than having everything spelled out.

calhoun07
01-22-06, 10:51 PM
I see that almost everyone's reasons for reading them in chrnological order deal with The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe. I have yet to come across any reasons for reading the others out of order with the exception of "that is the way Lewis intended". I am very familar with Lesis' "popular" philosophy and want to read these, but I am leaning toward starting with The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe and then proceedging in chronological order after that.

Anyone have an opinion on this? Thanks.

Sorry to resurrect this old thread, but it seems more relevant now, with the movie bringing more attention to the books.

I would agree with this. It's apparent that CS Lewis had always intended TLTWATW to be first. His first image of Narnia was the fawn and the lamp post, and I believe he always intended that to be the introduction to Narnia for new readers as well. However, I also believe that he had all the intention of following that book with Magician's Nephew, as it is apparent he had been working on that after the first book. So perhaps the proper order should be:
* 1.1 The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
* 1.2 The Magician's Nephew
* 1.3 Prince Caspian
* 1.4 The Voyage of the Dawn Treader
* 1.5 The Silver Chair
* 1.6 The Horse and His Boy
* 1.7 The Last Battle

It seems to be up to interpretation as to what he intended the original construct of the stories to be, but seeing as he started working on Magician's Nephew following Wardrobe, I think it would be logical to follow the first story with the prequel then go back into Narnia with the kids in Caspian and go from there.

Just an opinion, of course.

I doubt any publisher would ever adopt that order. If the books get reordered again, it will be back to the original order, should the order of the movies make that more popular again.

Seeker
01-23-06, 12:01 AM
The stepson re-ordered the books, but I think he did so having read TLWATW first. So he wasn't 'spoiled'

Obviously I think it is a bad decision.

Lion/Witch/Wardrobe is obviously THEMATICALLY first.

Whether Magician's Nephew is second or sixth is debatable, but having Magician's Nephew before Wardrobe is just wrong.