Flawed 'Directors Cuts'
#1
Moderator
Thread Starter
Flawed 'Directors Cuts'
Reading several different thread subjects made me raise some doubts and observations on the pros and cons of 'Director Cuts' of certain films. Two that came to mind were "Alien" and "Cinema Paradiso" where the shorter theatrical cuts of the film are better in my opinion, and in the instance of "Cinema Paradiso" radically altered the film's characterizations and outcome.
What, if any, (directors cut) of film, seem inferior to their theatrical version?
What, if any, (directors cut) of film, seem inferior to their theatrical version?
#4
Moderator
Thread Starter
Originally posted by sundog
Though I don't think so, many consider the director's cut of Blade Runner to be inferior to the original.
Though I don't think so, many consider the director's cut of Blade Runner to be inferior to the original.
This film is marred by multiple version floating around.
- the R-rated US Theatrical cut
- European unrated cut
- work in print cut
- so called director's cut
#5
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Originally posted by Giles
let's hope this is rectified with the eventual release of the 'new' director's cut . . .
let's hope this is rectified with the eventual release of the 'new' director's cut . . .
MORE JOE TURKEL!!!!!
You bring up a good point about multiple versions floating about. I've read about how Orson Welles would recut his later films depending on where they were shown. My head was swimming after learning of the different cuts of The Trial and such. How do you get a definitive version? It's near impossible from my understanding.
#6
Moderator
Thread Starter
Originally posted by sundog
I have only one request involving a new version:
MORE JOE TURKEL!!!!!
You bring up a good point about multiple versions floating about. I've read about how Orson Welles would recut his later films depending on where they were shown. My head was swimming after learning of the different cuts of The Trial and such. How do you get a definitive version? It's near impossible from my understanding.
I have only one request involving a new version:
MORE JOE TURKEL!!!!!
You bring up a good point about multiple versions floating about. I've read about how Orson Welles would recut his later films depending on where they were shown. My head was swimming after learning of the different cuts of The Trial and such. How do you get a definitive version? It's near impossible from my understanding.
#9
Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: MN
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think that the DC/Bootleg of Army of Darkness was not as good as the US theatrical cut. I wasn't a fan of the origianal ending and the "Good, bad, I'm the one with the gun." line was changed.
#12
I prefer the theatrical Dawn of the Dead to the 'director's cut'. I thought the additions to the beginning were unnecessary and slowed things down.
Spoiler:
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by dremo
I think that the DC/Bootleg of Army of Darkness was not as good as the US theatrical cut. I wasn't a fan of the origianal ending and the "Good, bad, I'm the one with the gun." line was changed.
I think that the DC/Bootleg of Army of Darkness was not as good as the US theatrical cut. I wasn't a fan of the origianal ending and the "Good, bad, I'm the one with the gun." line was changed.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think it's unfair to go after the Director's Cut of "Alien" because it's really not a director's cut, and Scott even says so on the dvd. The studio just wanted a different cut so they could make more money.
#16
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Gainesville, VA
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the theatrical (or "international") cut of My Sassy Girl is better than the director's cut. The extra scenes in the DC drag it down and don't add much to the story.
#17
DVD Talk Hero
Originally posted by Star Wars Guy
Obviously I haven't looked into this very much and I've held off buying AOD (still have the VHS copy), but what else have they changed? That's one of my favorite lines in the movie!
Obviously I haven't looked into this very much and I've held off buying AOD (still have the VHS copy), but what else have they changed? That's one of my favorite lines in the movie!
#18
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Taxachusetts
Posts: 2,316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The one that pops immediately to mind is the DC of Basic Instinct. There was no point to it other than adding 30 seconds of Sharon Stone and Jeanne Tripplehorn's T&A.
#20
Banned by request
Originally posted by PalmerJoss
The one that pops immediately to mind is the DC of Basic Instinct. There was no point to it other than adding 30 seconds of Sharon Stone and Jeanne Tripplehorn's T&A.
The one that pops immediately to mind is the DC of Basic Instinct. There was no point to it other than adding 30 seconds of Sharon Stone and Jeanne Tripplehorn's T&A.
As for Dawn of the Dead, the longer version labeled the director's cut was actually a workprint that Romero took to Cannes. The theatrical cut is his preferred cut.
#21
DVD Talk Legend
A DVDTalk thread, and nobody has dissed Star Wars yet?
#22
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Having been to about 40 or so test screenings in the past 5 years, I've definately noticed a couple of things:
The pacing is often very bad in the original cuts.
The originla cuts are often a little more raw - with many movies removies any scenes with a trace of controversy.
The music in the original cuts is often very bad and derivative.
The pacing is often very bad in the original cuts.
The originla cuts are often a little more raw - with many movies removies any scenes with a trace of controversy.
The music in the original cuts is often very bad and derivative.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: TX
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Andalusia
I'll second the pick for "Apocalypse Now". If there was one movie that didn't need to be longer...
I'll second the pick for "Apocalypse Now". If there was one movie that didn't need to be longer...
I notice there seems to be a common theme among the complaints about the director's cuts that have been mentioned: pacing. I think one DC that does the opposite (quickens the pace of a movie that was otherwise very plodding and slow-moving) is the DC DVD of Star Trek: The Motion Picture.
I think that "unrated cuts", R-rated cuts and other such alternate versions that aren't necessarily director's cuts are more of a concern than ill-conceived DCs.
#25
DVD Talk Legend
Two that came to mind were "Alien" and "Cinema Paradiso" where the shorter theatrical cuts of the film are better in my opinion
With Dawn of the Dead, I prefer the theatrical cut, but I did like the fact the director's cut had more gore. Similar to Battle Royale and the special edition. I hate the extra scenes, but I did like how it has more gore and a few "flubs" were corrected.
With Army of Darkness, I prefer the "extended cut" if not for the darker ending and extended sequences; but there's a few things I like more in the theatrical cut ("Good. Bad. I'm the guy with the gun.")
The unrated edition of American Wedding and it's additions really weren't that substantial (similar to the first two Pie films and their unrated editions). While I did like the extra things with Stiffler (especially when he yells at the hotel desk clerk), the way the "bachelor party" is edited in the unrated edition does not flow well at all and feels like a DVD extra placed right in the middle of the movie.