Vic Venom

I know there was a website that showed the difference between the altered and unaltered scenes. Anyone have a link to that site/article?

docF94

Check out the comparisons on DVD Beaver (which for those who don't know is a great DVD comparison site, and absolutely NOT a porn site, despite the name, and the fact that in this lonely instance, there's some adult content):
http://www.celtoslavica.de/chiaroscu...iche/eyes.html

There are other sites that have some still shots, but the DVD-B comparison makes clear how much the digital characters have affected the image quality. Warners should be absolutely ashamed of itself.

Kwaheri.

DVD NDN

Weren't the digital characters added to the FILM, so it shouldn't have affected the DVD?

Geofferson

thanks for the link - that's an impressive site.

JJE-187

The R1 is the R-rated digitally altered version, where EVERY OTHER REGION is the unaltered version.

I have the R3 which is the most complete "vision" Kubrick had for the film

Gil Jawetz

Could this poster possibly be less enticing?

From DVDBeaver

philo

Bizarre. What country is that poster from?
Also is that R3 edition available anymore?

theneobez

Are those ass cheeks or what?

Dazed

ewww, that looks like a really bad fanboy poster (who has yet to learn Photoshop properly).

More proof that many of the people who design posters and dvd packaging should maybe look for employment in another field.