Ebert Review!! 3.5 Stars!!
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ebert Review!! 3.5 Stars!!
http://www.suntimes.com/output/ebert...matrix14f.html
Great news!!! He only gave the original 3 stars
Great news!!! He only gave the original 3 stars
#3
DVD Talk Gold Edition
yes, he did seem to like it.
although as is becoming the standard now with him, the review is depressingly shallow.
a much better (dare i say it? pulitzer worthy ) review can be found by Gopnick in the New Yorker.
read only after you see the movie, but definitely seek this one
although as is becoming the standard now with him, the review is depressingly shallow.
a much better (dare i say it? pulitzer worthy ) review can be found by Gopnick in the New Yorker.
read only after you see the movie, but definitely seek this one
#8
DVD Talk Gold Edition
what did Ebert win the Pulitzer for anyway?
and no, i don't think a review for TMR is going to win a Pulitzer, but if you are the kind of Matrix fan that is stimulated by some of the philosophical implications of the first movie, Gopnick goes into this in quite some depth in his much more substanative review of TMR (which isn't quite as positive as Eberts).
i believe Ebert also gave The Rock the same ***1/2 score.
the segment of audience i was expecting this film to most positively resonate with, and what i was getting at in the other thread.
I'll be interested to see what G.K. thinks later tonight/tomorrow.
and no, i don't think a review for TMR is going to win a Pulitzer, but if you are the kind of Matrix fan that is stimulated by some of the philosophical implications of the first movie, Gopnick goes into this in quite some depth in his much more substanative review of TMR (which isn't quite as positive as Eberts).
i believe Ebert also gave The Rock the same ***1/2 score.
the segment of audience i was expecting this film to most positively resonate with, and what i was getting at in the other thread.
I'll be interested to see what G.K. thinks later tonight/tomorrow.
Last edited by ckolchak; 05-14-03 at 10:43 AM.
#10
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 4,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not sure what to think about the review. Ebert doesn't really discuss the movie as much as he merely acknowledges its characteristics. The implications of The Matrix as a cultural phenomenon are interesting but at this point I think what we'd all like to hear is just how spectacular the effects are and how well the storyline is developed. I like it when Ebert's in a jokey mood but both this and his X2 review suffer from him affectionately mentioning loopholes in the movies' concepts instead of writing about what works and what doesn't.
#11
Moderator
Originally posted by Dr. DVD
Typically his reviews are the exact opposite of what I think of a movie.
Typically his reviews are the exact opposite of what I think of a movie.
#12
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 9,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here we go again with bashing Ebert..the man is one guy. His columns are his opinions of the movies. He has been a consistently good writer and reviewer for a long, long time.
#13
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Ebert has a weakness for pretty FX - regardless of how vapid the actual storyline may be. He's demonstrated this time and time again. See "The Cell" or "Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace."
#14
Moderator
Originally posted by grunter
Ebert has a weakness for pretty FX - regardless of how vapid the actual storyline may be. He's demonstrated this time and time again. See "The Cell" or "Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace."
Ebert has a weakness for pretty FX - regardless of how vapid the actual storyline may be. He's demonstrated this time and time again. See "The Cell" or "Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace."
#17
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Ebert has a weakness for pretty FX - regardless of how vapid the actual storyline may be.
Okay...this makes me less optimistic.
#18
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 4,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Terrell
In the end the only opinion that matters is your own.
In the end the only opinion that matters is your own.
Last edited by Tyler_Durden; 05-14-03 at 04:08 PM.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: CA
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Ebert Review!! 3.5 Stars!!
Originally posted by dvdnation
Great news!!! He only gave the original 3 stars
Great news!!! He only gave the original 3 stars
#21
DVD Talk Gold Edition
i think its safe to say that Ebert, despite the positve review, doesn't 'get' it, in the same way that 99% of the viewers don't get the material, and won't get the material until 6 months from now...if ever.
i think Ebert does realize that the film is (going to be) popular and appreciates the fact that the wachowskis are trying to get beyond the usual brainless action picture, and just may be making a sci-fi movie on the level of Citizen Kane.
he doesn't want the possibility of being viewed in the future as 'not being hip to deep concepts' so he gives the film high marks.
its amusing that he also gave XXX high marks.
i didn't have near as much affection for TMR as some people, but i appreciate the concepts at play here. just the fact that it spurs such discussion (though apparently not much deep discussion on this particular forum) is laudable,
but not enough for me to gloss over problems i have with the actual film as an entertaining story.
and i'm sorry, but Keanu Reeves, even though he gave one of the better performances in this film, just goes to show how much most of the other performances sucked.
maybe he's actually the perfect choice to play a mathematical equation... but math wasn't my bag in school so his 'dramatic' charms are lost on me.
i think Ebert does realize that the film is (going to be) popular and appreciates the fact that the wachowskis are trying to get beyond the usual brainless action picture, and just may be making a sci-fi movie on the level of Citizen Kane.
he doesn't want the possibility of being viewed in the future as 'not being hip to deep concepts' so he gives the film high marks.
its amusing that he also gave XXX high marks.
i didn't have near as much affection for TMR as some people, but i appreciate the concepts at play here. just the fact that it spurs such discussion (though apparently not much deep discussion on this particular forum) is laudable,
but not enough for me to gloss over problems i have with the actual film as an entertaining story.
and i'm sorry, but Keanu Reeves, even though he gave one of the better performances in this film, just goes to show how much most of the other performances sucked.
maybe he's actually the perfect choice to play a mathematical equation... but math wasn't my bag in school so his 'dramatic' charms are lost on me.
#22
DVD Talk God
Originally posted by Geofferson
He does. Dark City is one of his all-time favorite movies...largely due to the FX.
He does. Dark City is one of his all-time favorite movies...largely due to the FX.