DVD Talk
OK. This has gone too far! [Archive] - DVD Talk Forum
 
Best Sellers
1.
2.
The Blind Side
Buy: $28.98 $16.99
3.
4.
5.
Food, Inc.
Buy: $26.98 $9.99
6.
7.
The Hurt Locker
Buy: $26.99 $17.99
8.
Up in the Air
Buy: $29.98 $16.99
9.
10.
Sherlock Holmes
Buy: $28.98 $16.99
DVD Blowouts
1.
2.
3.
4.
Band of Brothers
Buy: $79.98 $43.99
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

PDA
DVD Reviews

View Full Version : OK. This has gone too far!


Wizdar
05-08-03, 10:03 AM
I’m trying to post something in TVTalk about a TV program featuring dogs. (http://www.dvdtalk.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=290776) I’m making a reference to a possible suspension using a certain country’s name, as is often done when referring to this breed.

Instead of “ possible suspension,” I get “[insert country name] possible suspension.”

Thanks for the warning. I honestly appreciate knowing up front.

But, C’MON guys! Isn’t this taking things just a wee bit too far? Has it really come to this?


And, as I’ve previewed this post in advance, it turns out that “French” is not the hot-button word. It’s the [i]dog’s breed name that’s gonna get me in trouble?!? WTF? I've left the above exactly as it was presented to me in the preview. :hscratch:

RandyC
05-08-03, 10:20 AM
LOL

We should fix that. It was a temporary solution.

French Poodle

joltaddict
05-08-03, 11:17 AM
test - I need more proof

Bushdog
05-13-03, 07:28 PM
I need more poof

Bandoman
05-13-03, 07:41 PM
I need to think of something new to prove.

Wizdar
05-13-03, 08:35 PM
Poodle.

Ya know, I can understand possible suspension, and would certainly support potential permanent ban.

But how does frog slip by, and not poodle?

I guess I had to be there.

Goblincat
05-15-03, 12:41 PM
French pianist

Groucho
05-15-03, 12:48 PM
I have no idea what this thread is talking about. Does the forum give you warning messages if you post a word that might set you up for suspension or something? I guess I'm missing something.

Wizdar
05-15-03, 01:38 PM
Well, it seems that, for some strange reason, it seems that “poodle” was a no-no. I misread the situation, and naturally thought I was being warned about “French,” which I guess might be understandable. They’re screwing up just about everything these days. That would make my first post, for you, very confusing. Ya with me so far?

Now, my last post, maybe if I used brackets or something the faux substituted words would be more clear. But, as I am often quite unclear, what would be the point?

So, yes, it would appear that there was an auto substitution in place that substituted “poodle” with “possible suspension,” just as swear words are replaced with ****. (IB<b></b>TL has been like that for quite some time.)

Groucho
05-15-03, 01:54 PM
In before the lock

<i>Please do not post 'In Before The Lock' Posts. Instead please use the Report this post to a Moderator link on the bottom of each post</i>

I'm not seeing it?

EDIT: Now I see it!

Lamecube

Bushdog
05-15-03, 05:38 PM
suXBox

joltaddict
05-15-03, 05:51 PM
Originally posted by Wizdar
Well, it seems that, for some strange reason, it seems that “poodle” was a no-no. I misread the situation, and naturally thought I was being warned about “French,” which I guess might be understandable. They’re screwing up just about everything these days.

Poodles are always a no-no.

LurkerDan
05-16-03, 03:51 PM
It's not the poodle that's a no-no, it's what you do with the poodle... :eyebrow: