I agree with Dustin Hoffman about "Moonlight Mile"
#1
DVD Talk Legend
Thread Starter
I agree with Dustin Hoffman about "Moonlight Mile"
Just saw the film on DVD, and I agree 100% with Dustin Hoffman. I don't think Disney gave this film the push it should have. Not that I think it would have been a huge box-office hit or anything, but it deserved so much more than it got. I thought this was great little film. And every performance was terrific. I hope if finds an audience on video. Thumbs up!
And no, I don't work for Disney, Dustin Hoffman or Blockbuster.
And no, I don't work for Disney, Dustin Hoffman or Blockbuster.
#2
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: A little bit here and a little bit there.
Posts: 2,644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The film wasn't very good, but the performances were.
Hoffman should be yelling at brad siberling for making such a perfunctory movie.
Hoffman should be yelling at brad siberling for making such a perfunctory movie.
#3
DVD Talk Legend
I liked the movie, but I think his complaints are kind of bogus. Some movies are not big sellers and no matter how much you market it, they won't sell. It doesn't mean the movies are bad. The Pianist, The Hours, and Gangs of New York aren't exactly raking it in and they have big name stars (well two of them do) and have the benefit of the Ocsar Nominee label.
Many people ignore good movies for whatever reason and pooring huge amounts of money into was not worth it financially. it may have increased the box office a little bit, but it would not have be a good return on their investment. Sometimes movies, even good ones, don't make that much money at no fault of the studio.
And from the studio's point of view, it's risk reward kind of thing. Sure, every once in a while a small movie hits it big like My Big Fat Greek Wedding, but most of them do not hit it big. Hell, MBFGW didn't exactly have promotion behind it either and it did well. Maybe the movie will find a much larger audience on DVD/VHS. But I wouldn't hold my breath.
Many people ignore good movies for whatever reason and pooring huge amounts of money into was not worth it financially. it may have increased the box office a little bit, but it would not have be a good return on their investment. Sometimes movies, even good ones, don't make that much money at no fault of the studio.
And from the studio's point of view, it's risk reward kind of thing. Sure, every once in a while a small movie hits it big like My Big Fat Greek Wedding, but most of them do not hit it big. Hell, MBFGW didn't exactly have promotion behind it either and it did well. Maybe the movie will find a much larger audience on DVD/VHS. But I wouldn't hold my breath.
#4
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: "Sitting on a beach, earning 20%"
Posts: 6,154
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I disagree w/ Hoffmans complaint on the simple grounds that I saw a S#%* load of commercials for this movie the week before it came out. I saw more commercials for Moonlight Mile than I did for Chicago or the Pianist before thier opening weekend
#5
DVD Talk Hero
Originally posted by Pants
I disagree w/ Hoffmans complaint on the simple grounds that I saw a S#%* load of commercials for this movie the week before it came out. I saw more commercials for Moonlight Mile than I did for Chicago or the Pianist before thier opening weekend
I disagree w/ Hoffmans complaint on the simple grounds that I saw a S#%* load of commercials for this movie the week before it came out. I saw more commercials for Moonlight Mile than I did for Chicago or the Pianist before thier opening weekend
#6
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey there.
I saw the film in the theatre and I wanted to like it more than I did.
Like someone else said, the performances were good but it was missing something. Maybe it wasnt as OPrdinary People as I wanted it to be. It didnt affect me as much as I had hoped.
Jakes great though.
I saw the film in the theatre and I wanted to like it more than I did.
Like someone else said, the performances were good but it was missing something. Maybe it wasnt as OPrdinary People as I wanted it to be. It didnt affect me as much as I had hoped.
Jakes great though.
#8
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Considering that this movie doesn't have unianimous, loving support from critics and people around the world, I tend to think Dustin Hoffman is...well...wrong. Looking at the story of this movie and the setting, I can see that it just wouldn't be that big of a box office hit. And as someone said before, risk reward. While there is the potential it could hit big, when the chances of that happening regarding the subject matter are not that large, why risk it and sink your money into it? I mean, I saw a lot of commercials. What was Disney supposed to do? Put this in 4000 theaters with a 50 million dollar marketing push? That would be dumb. In this world, movie quality is not the only measure of how much money should be spent on a movie.
#9
DVD Talk Hero
Originally posted by lesterlong
If the movie was good enough people would of saw it. Its that simple.
If the movie was good enough people would of saw it. Its that simple.
Plenty of fine films are box office bombs.
Moonlight Mile (IMO) was not a great movie but it was very good and it had great performances that were totally overlooked because the movie was overlooked. I'll take this film over many recent overly praised films (IMO) such as The Hours, In the Bedroom, Adaptation and Monster's Ball.
Last edited by movielib; 03-21-03 at 05:27 PM.
#10
DVD Talk Legend
Thread Starter
Originally posted by movielib
There are three grammatical errors (four if you believe in the subjunctive) and one factual error in that statement.
Plenty of fine films are box office bombs.
Mooklight Mile (IMO) was not a great movie but it was very good and it had great performances that were totally overlooked because the movie was overlooked. I'll take this film over many recent overly praised films (IMO) such as The Hours, In the Bedroom, Adaptation and Monster's Ball.
There are three grammatical errors (four if you believe in the subjunctive) and one factual error in that statement.
Plenty of fine films are box office bombs.
Mooklight Mile (IMO) was not a great movie but it was very good and it had great performances that were totally overlooked because the movie was overlooked. I'll take this film over many recent overly praised films (IMO) such as The Hours, In the Bedroom, Adaptation and Monster's Ball.
And about this film be advertised more than "Chicago" and "The Pianist"? Not on my city. And I live in D.C. I saw one preview for "Mile" in the theatres, and one on television. "Chicago" and "The Pianist"? Several a day.
#11
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Right Behind You
Posts: 4,986
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've never seen a commercial for The Pianist in my area, however, I did see a few for Moonlight Mile. Even if movies don't get the commercial buzz, they should still sell by word-of-mouth. And there wasn't any good word-of-mouth. An actor should never blame a studio for not promoting their movie, it was a released and not received well. That's it. Move on to another project.
#12
DVD Talk Legend
Thread Starter
Originally posted by lesterlong
I've never seen a commercial for The Pianist in my area, however, I did see a few for Moonlight Mile. Even if movies don't get the commercial buzz, they should still sell by word-of-mouth. And there wasn't any good word-of-mouth. An actor should never blame a studio for not promoting their movie, it was a released and not received well. That's it. Move on to another project.
I've never seen a commercial for The Pianist in my area, however, I did see a few for Moonlight Mile. Even if movies don't get the commercial buzz, they should still sell by word-of-mouth. And there wasn't any good word-of-mouth. An actor should never blame a studio for not promoting their movie, it was a released and not received well. That's it. Move on to another project.
#14
DVD Talk Hero
Originally posted by Daytripper
THANK YOU! Me too (taking this over the movies you mentioned). Perhaps when I rated this movie "great", I went a little overboard. I enjoyed every minute of it. And loved the performances. I'd give it a solid *** 1/2 out of ****.
...
THANK YOU! Me too (taking this over the movies you mentioned). Perhaps when I rated this movie "great", I went a little overboard. I enjoyed every minute of it. And loved the performances. I'd give it a solid *** 1/2 out of ****.
...
#15
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I disagree with Lester.
There are allot of movies that deserve to be bigger hits like Billy Elliott and You Can Count on me and the same can be said for all the really bad movies that make a 100 million dollars and dont deserve to make more than 5 million.
There are allot of movies that deserve to be bigger hits like Billy Elliott and You Can Count on me and the same can be said for all the really bad movies that make a 100 million dollars and dont deserve to make more than 5 million.
#16
DVD Talk Legend
I absolutely loved this film...just saw it tonight as a rental and it will be on my shelf soon enough. Outstanding performances all around and an entirely realistic and genuine feel to every scene. These were real people on screen.....one of the best of 2002 without a doubt.
#17
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by warpcorebreach
Jakes great though.
Jakes great though.
#18
DVD Talk Legend
yet he still hasn't fully erased the evil that was the Bubble Boy from my memory banks....
seriously though, emotionally 'disturbed' is a tad harsh for this role dontchya think?
seriously though, emotionally 'disturbed' is a tad harsh for this role dontchya think?
#20
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by lesterlong
If the movie was good enough people would of saw it. Its that simple.
If the movie was good enough people would of saw it. Its that simple.