One Hour Photo DVD review
#2
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
have to say your review couldn't be more wrong on robin williams performance but that being said your entitled to your opinion just like i am. Thanks for the review!
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Pitt Meadows, BC, Canada
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ugh... sorry man, this is totally going to come across as a threadcrap, but I couldn't help to cringe while reading that review. Seemed to me like the author was trying to throw in as much impressive phrases and decorative words as possible, and it seemed more than a little pretentious to me.
Yeah, sorry...
Yeah, sorry...
#4
DVD Talk Legend
I second that opinion, Geoff.
#5
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Josh Zyber
I second that opinion, Geoff.
I second that opinion, Geoff.
Have you considered that we are not poseurs, not trying to look smart, but, and I say this without irony or arrogance, actually are? It's so reactionary, levelling this complaint at us, so selfish, such a transparent unsheathing of your Achilles' Heels--they being an incapacity for bookish thought. Would you say the same thing to a literary critic, "Too many big words"? A food critic, "Just tell me if it tastes like chicken"? Because the movies are the democratic art, we are expected to condescend? I just don't get it, and apparently never will.
When I was fourteen, I read a review of MILLER'S CROSSING by Andrew Sarris in which he used the word "aesthetic." As this word was Greek to me, my options were as follows:
1. Write Andrew Sarris and tell him to dumb it down.
2. Look up "aesthetic" in the dictionary.
3. Quietly resent Andrew Sarris for the rest of my life and go on not knowing how to use "aesthetic" in a sentence.
Andrew Sarris, the man who brough the auteurist theory to America, imported it like a wine, was of a different era, I'll grant him. There's something about the Internet, you're just expected to cater to the LCD. But we will be an illiterate nation a few generations from now, especially if folks like yourself, Josh, pull a Benedict Arnold on those of us attempting, success notwithstanding, something scholarly--the cinema deserves it in the Ain't It Cool era, does it not?
Without alternatives, there are no alternatives, if you know what I mean.
Bill C
filmfreakcentral.net
#6
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Sarris review was not of MILLER'S CROSSING, but of DO THE RIGHT THING. I wish that wasn't the case, as I'd love to shave a few years off my life.
Sorry, obsessive about these things.
Bill C
filmfreakcentral.net
Sorry, obsessive about these things.
Bill C
filmfreakcentral.net