Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

Most bankable star...

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

Most bankable star...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-31-02, 10:23 AM
  #1  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,147
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Most bankable star...

With stars' paychecks for movies reaching $20,000,000+ now, which stars are truely desrving of it? Which stars constantly put people in seats and have huge box office returns? It doesn't matter if you like them or not, if they are in a movie, it stands a pretty good chance of turning a profit just because their name is attatched to it. Each has had a couple low points but far outweighed by hits.

My list of most bankable stars:
Tom Hanks
Julia Roberts
Reese Witherspoon
Mel Gibson
Meg Ryan
Stephen Spielburg - probably the most bankable director


Some stars get big salaries because of one big hit but don't seem to star in more huge hits. Leo Decaprio is a good example of this. Because of Titanic, he gets $20M a movie. People said teenage girls boosted Titanic's BO because they saw it 10 times to see Leo. However, since then, 'Leo Decaprio' movies haven't done that well. Shouldn't the girls be seeing these movies 10 times?

Arnold Swartzanegger used to be very bankable but his recent movies haven't been huge hits...
Old 12-31-02, 11:30 AM
  #2  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You left out the most bankable of all - Tom Cruise.
Old 12-31-02, 11:39 AM
  #3  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Grounded in reality. For the most part.
Posts: 4,806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Soddenberg is becoming a pretty bankable director.
Old 12-31-02, 02:19 PM
  #4  
DVD Talk God
 
Deftones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Arizona
Posts: 81,065
Received 1,375 Likes on 936 Posts
Originally posted by Alien Redrum
Soddenberg is becoming a pretty bankable director.
His last two films tanked. Full Frontal and Solaris were major box office disappointments.
Old 12-31-02, 02:28 PM
  #5  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Heat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 16,702
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Tom Hanks, Tom Cruise, and Mel Gibson, definately.

Also Nicole Kidman and Nicolas Cage.

An up and coming bankable star? Ewan McGregor
Old 12-31-02, 02:31 PM
  #6  
Moderator
 
wendersfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: America!
Posts: 33,921
Received 164 Likes on 120 Posts
Originally posted by Deftones
His last two films tanked. Full Frontal and Solaris were major box office disappointments.
You might be right, but I don't think they were intended to do well at the box office. I doubt if anyone would have complained if they had made a lot of money, but that's not why they were made. Given Soderbergh's current stature, I'm guessing he will continue to alternate between making high-quality "fluff" (Erin Brockovich, Ocean's 11) that is intended to make lots of money, and more arty films (Full Frontal, Solaris) that aren't. Seems like the perfect position for a director to be in.

FWIW, I'd say Julia Roberts is pretty bankable, Full Frontal notwithstanding... :-)

Last edited by wendersfan; 12-31-02 at 03:31 PM.
Old 12-31-02, 02:44 PM
  #7  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Rypro 525's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: a frikin hellhole
Posts: 28,263
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
vin desal is reportingly getting 20 million dollars for xXx 2,
Old 12-31-02, 02:53 PM
  #8  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Kal-El's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Fortress of Solitude
Posts: 7,992
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I'd love to see the 2 Tom's in ONE movie.
Old 12-31-02, 02:59 PM
  #9  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Most bankable star...

[QUOTE]Originally posted by resinrats
[B]With stars' paychecks for movies reaching $20,000,000+ now, which stars are truely desrving of it? Which stars constantly put people in seats and have huge box office returns? It doesn't matter if you like them or not, if they are in a movie, it stands a pretty good chance of turning a profit just because their name is attatched to it. Each has had a couple low points but far outweighed by hits.

Stephen Spielburg - probably the most bankable director


FYI,

It's STEVEN SPIELBERG
Old 12-31-02, 03:05 PM
  #10  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: IL
Posts: 2,678
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I would say Tom Cruise except that he's alienating his popcorn audience by taking on riskier pictures of late.

I'd like to see Tom Hanks do a little something crazy for a change. Hell, I'm convinced that Joe and Josephine Six-Pack would go see him in anything.
Old 12-31-02, 03:10 PM
  #11  
DVD Talk God
 
Deftones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Arizona
Posts: 81,065
Received 1,375 Likes on 936 Posts
Originally posted by wendersfan
You might be right, but I don't think they were intended to do well at the box office.
You don't think they were intended to do well at the box office?

Making movies is like any other business. What is the # 1 goal? Make money, bottom line. Sure, the stars, the director may be making movies because of their love of creating or the their love of acting, but the studios make the movies to make money.
Old 12-31-02, 03:16 PM
  #12  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Charlie Goose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Sesame Street (the apt. next to Bob's)
Posts: 20,195
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally posted by Frank TJ Mackey
I would say Tom Cruise except that he's alienating his popcorn audience by taking on riskier pictures of late.

I'd like to see Tom Hanks do a little something crazy for a change. Hell, I'm convinced that Joe and Josephine Six-Pack would go see him in anything.
Popcorn audience?

Joe and Josephine Six-Pack?

Can you throw in any more elitist catchphrases? Really, it won't sound too snotty.

Honk!
Old 12-31-02, 03:23 PM
  #13  
Moderator
 
wendersfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: America!
Posts: 33,921
Received 164 Likes on 120 Posts
Originally posted by Deftones
You don't think they were intended to do well at the box office?

Making movies is like any other business. What is the # 1 goal? Make money, bottom line. Sure, the stars, the director may be making movies because of their love of creating or the their love of acting, but the studios make the movies to make money.
Full Frontal cost $2 million to make. So far it's made between $2.5 and 3 million. It was a vanity project that didn't lose money, and actually turned a small profit. Basically, if a studio makes a deal with Soderbergh where they bankroll a $2 million vanity project and he agrees to pull out the stops for something like Traffic, then everybody gets what they want.

Solaris cost $47 million. So either it was a really expensive vanity project, or somebody somewhere thought it would turn a profit. It still might - who knows?

Last edited by wendersfan; 12-31-02 at 08:34 PM.
Old 12-31-02, 03:27 PM
  #14  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: IL
Posts: 2,678
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by Charlie Goose
Popcorn audience?

Joe and Josephine Six-Pack?

Can you throw in any more elitist catchphrases? Really, it won't sound too snotty.

Honk!

I apologize if I offended you or something.
Old 12-31-02, 03:47 PM
  #15  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Grounded in reality. For the most part.
Posts: 4,806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Deftones
His last two films tanked. Full Frontal and Solaris were major box office disappointments.
True, but Spielberg had his bombs too.

I'm not saying Sodenberg is as good as Spielberg, but I imagine he will get there.
Old 12-31-02, 03:50 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: In a sewer.
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Worst spelling ever by the original poster.

It's Steven Spielberg & Arnold Schwarzenegger, yeesh.
Old 12-31-02, 04:16 PM
  #17  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Kal-El's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Fortress of Solitude
Posts: 7,992
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
It's also Soderbergh while we're at it.
Old 12-31-02, 04:23 PM
  #18  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
The Antipodean's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 6,643
Received 168 Likes on 120 Posts
Tom Hanks is probably most dependable of those named.
Old 12-31-02, 11:34 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: I'll be in my bunk
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think Russell Crowe has been pretty dependable $$$ wise ever since his US acting career took off.
Old 12-31-02, 11:56 PM
  #20  
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Location: Burley,ID USA
Posts: 4,999
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CGI they have no salories to pay!
Old 12-31-02, 11:57 PM
  #21  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 8,466
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Not including K-19 and the horrid Random Hearts, Harrison Ford is considered the most bankable star.

At least, that is what I read somewhere.
Old 01-01-03, 01:17 AM
  #22  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 10,614
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Tom Hanks!
Old 01-01-03, 01:33 AM
  #23  
Moderator
 
Groucho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 71,383
Received 122 Likes on 84 Posts
I saw a breakdown one time that added up the take of all the films stars had been in and totaled them up. The stars with the best box office take were (seriously) Jeff Goldblum and Carrie Fisher.
Old 01-01-03, 01:34 AM
  #24  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For a while there Adam Sandler was pure bank..

At least along the lines of making a film for less $$$ and turning a profit off. No make that a HUGE profit... Sure he is not up to the level of actor as some of the others on the list but still the cash flow based more or less just off his name to attached to a film is pretty high.

numbers all off imdb

Happy Gilmore - 1996
cost 10mil - takes 30mil plus
Wedding Singer 1998
80+ box office
WaterBoy 1998
cost 23m - take 160+ just in the usa (doh)
Big Daddy 1999
cost 32m - take 90
Little Nicky 2000
errr ok that tanked
Mr. Deeds 2001
cost 50 - take - 125usa - 35+ outside usa

as you can see that is a huge profit for just about any film with him attached to it and for the most part that is ALL those films had going for them in the first place. Granted he has branched out some more as of late so those might not make as much $$$ (punch drunk love)

Still, I would be willing to bet that if he returned to his normal fratboy like sort of film roots it would pull big profit and that is just off his name on attached to the film.
Old 01-01-03, 02:22 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Michigan
Posts: 964
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It seems Tom Hanks can star in a movie about paint drying and it'll still make $100 million - and I'll probably be there, too... Pretty impressive for the star of Money Pit and Bonfire of the Vanities.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.