Xbox Hardrive Defrag
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Xbox Hardrive Defrag
I was just wondering if there will ever be a need or a way to defrag the HD with the adding and removing of save and music data?
I sent this question to Xbox.com, but haven't gotten a reply yet.
I sent this question to Xbox.com, but haven't gotten a reply yet.
#3
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Greenville, South Cackalack
Posts: 28,708
Received 1,844 Likes
on
1,221 Posts
From http://members.cox.net/xboxfaq/faq.htm :
8.6 Does the Xbox hard drive need to be defragmented?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Last updated: 06/24/2002) Back to top
No, but not because it has some special file system that never gets fragmented. The Xbox uses FAT32, in fact, just like many PCs. It can get fragmented, but this fragmentation will not affect performance in any significant way. Why? Here's my theory:
1. The Xbox hard drive (and especially the user partition) isn't big enough for fragmentation to cause the disk heads all that much extra work
2. Save files aren't big enough to get scattered too far
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Last updated: 06/24/2002) Back to top
No, but not because it has some special file system that never gets fragmented. The Xbox uses FAT32, in fact, just like many PCs. It can get fragmented, but this fragmentation will not affect performance in any significant way. Why? Here's my theory:
1. The Xbox hard drive (and especially the user partition) isn't big enough for fragmentation to cause the disk heads all that much extra work
2. Save files aren't big enough to get scattered too far
#4
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: AZ
Posts: 1,816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
joltaddict, what you said is wrong. Defragging is still a very important part of pc maintenance and when you go to fix a pc that is grinding to a halt it is one of the first things you do.
#5
DVD Talk Legend
Originally posted by s}{ammer
Defragging is still a very important part of pc maintenance and when you go to fix a pc that is grinding to a halt it is one of the first things you do.
Defragging is still a very important part of pc maintenance and when you go to fix a pc that is grinding to a halt it is one of the first things you do.
#6
DVD Talk Legend
I tried to find a benchmark I saw before where they deliberately fragmented EVERY file on a volume, and had the free space broken up into "worst-case" fragments on top of that. Then they ran some tests where they only access a couple of files at a time and it was slightly slower than the non-fragmented volume. SHOCKER!!!! It doesnt affect performance or responsiveness in any real world use.
Ironically the bench was using this to show why defragging was so important. And no, I dont believe the moon landing was staged.
Ironically the bench was using this to show why defragging was so important. And no, I dont believe the moon landing was staged.
#7
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Feel Good Inc
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by joltaddict
It does nothing. It would allow you to fit more data on a hard drive but it has absolutely no bearing on performance. All youre doing is rearranging the data to be more compact. Its a myth. If a help desk guy tells you to defrag and reboot that means he has no idea whats causing the problem.
It does nothing. It would allow you to fit more data on a hard drive but it has absolutely no bearing on performance. All youre doing is rearranging the data to be more compact. Its a myth. If a help desk guy tells you to defrag and reboot that means he has no idea whats causing the problem.
it does help performance too, especially on bigger hds, like mine :P
#8
DVD Talk Legend
Originally posted by SpacemanSpiff
thats completely wrong dude, it doesnt save any space at all. defragment puts all the files that are running with the same program in the same physical location on the hard drive, so it doesnt have to seek different areas all over the disk
it does help performance too, especially on bigger hds, like mine :P
thats completely wrong dude, it doesnt save any space at all. defragment puts all the files that are running with the same program in the same physical location on the hard drive, so it doesnt have to seek different areas all over the disk
it does help performance too, especially on bigger hds, like mine :P
And if you can find one (just one) benchmark showing a measureable improvement in a real world app consider me converted.
#9
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hard drives still require defragmentation for "best performance". With my 120GB drive if I go 3 weeks without a defrag applications are slower to launch. Even at work i'll defrag that drive every couple of weeks since I have to launch multiples windows at once and I have better things to do then watch "Hour Glasses" while an application lauches. I hate having to sit at another desk becuase the system performance is so bad since they never defrag thier drive.
Getting back to the XBox it should not matter since your running the game off the DVD mostly
BTW...
Tomshardware on hard drive defragmentation
Getting back to the XBox it should not matter since your running the game off the DVD mostly
BTW...
Tomshardware on hard drive defragmentation
Last edited by cubanx; 08-16-02 at 01:54 AM.
#10
DVD Talk Legend
Originally posted by cubanx
Hard drives still require defragmentation for "best performance". With my 120GB drive if I go 3 weeks without a defrag applications are slower to launch. Even at work i'll defrag that drive every couple of weeks since I have to launch multiples windows at once and I have better things to do then watch "Hour Glasses" while an application lauches. I hate having to sit at another desk becuase the system performance is so bad since they never defrag thier drive.
BTW...
Tomshardware on hard drive defragmentation
Hard drives still require defragmentation for "best performance". With my 120GB drive if I go 3 weeks without a defrag applications are slower to launch. Even at work i'll defrag that drive every couple of weeks since I have to launch multiples windows at once and I have better things to do then watch "Hour Glasses" while an application lauches. I hate having to sit at another desk becuase the system performance is so bad since they never defrag thier drive.
BTW...
Tomshardware on hard drive defragmentation
"Although fragmentation has no direct influence on access time (it does not matter if a file is fragmented or not), the read/write heads may finish reading the last file fragment at a different position than they started. Unfortunately, cache algorithms cannot cope with this effect. At reduced efficiency, the cache memory won't be able to speed up the hard drive any more."
You realize thats measured in milliseconds dont you? Thats one one thousandth of a second. Any system performace you think your seeing is a placebo effect. Thats why I said show me a benchmark of a real word app. No offense I just dont think anybody can tell the diffence in an app launching in fractions of a second less on a defrag drive (on cache only no less).
Last edited by joltaddict; 08-16-02 at 04:18 AM.
#11
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by joltaddict
Thats why I said show me a benchmark of a real word app. No offense I just dont think anybody can tell the diffence in an app launching in fractions of a second less on a defrag drive (on cache only no less). [/B]
Thats why I said show me a benchmark of a real word app. No offense I just dont think anybody can tell the diffence in an app launching in fractions of a second less on a defrag drive (on cache only no less). [/B]
PDF Summary of performance increases by a drive defragmented by diskkeeper vs fragmented drive
Last edited by cubanx; 08-16-02 at 05:00 AM.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It does nothing. It would allow you to fit more data on a hard drive but it has absolutely no bearing on performance. All youre doing is rearranging the data to be more compact. Its a myth. If a help desk guy tells you to defrag and reboot that means he has no idea whats causing the problem.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the link ctyner.
I got this reply from Xbox.com
quote:
Thank you for writing to Xbox.
Regarding your inquiry about Xbox, you asked about a feature that unfortunately Xbox does not currently offer. However, we might do so in the future because we review all customer comments regularly and use them to help plan new improvements.
As for the defrag not helping performance is wrong wrong wrong. A co-worker has had his computer for 3.5 years and has never defragged it ever. He was complaining that it was running real slow and I told him to go ahead and defrag it. It took him over 8 hours to defrag his 10G HD. After that he said it is fast as hell!!
I got this reply from Xbox.com
quote:
Thank you for writing to Xbox.
Regarding your inquiry about Xbox, you asked about a feature that unfortunately Xbox does not currently offer. However, we might do so in the future because we review all customer comments regularly and use them to help plan new improvements.
As for the defrag not helping performance is wrong wrong wrong. A co-worker has had his computer for 3.5 years and has never defragged it ever. He was complaining that it was running real slow and I told him to go ahead and defrag it. It took him over 8 hours to defrag his 10G HD. After that he said it is fast as hell!!
#14
DVD Talk Legend
Originally posted by cubanx
Ask and you shall recieve
PDF Summary of performance increases by a drive defragmented by diskkeeper vs fragmented drive
Ask and you shall recieve
PDF Summary of performance increases by a drive defragmented by diskkeeper vs fragmented drive
And the details of it were even worse, they artificially fragmented the drive to an extent that normal use would never create. Plus how long does this performance increase last? They did the bench right after the defrag. Would a days worth of normal use put it back closer to where it started? Should I defrag at the end of every day? After every program? Every hour? How can I hold on to that precious 0.001 second?
Originally posted by WOWZY
A co-worker has had his computer for 3.5 years and has never defragged it ever. He was complaining that it was running real slow and I told him to go ahead and defrag is fast as hell!!
A co-worker has had his computer for 3.5 years and has never defragged it ever. He was complaining that it was running real slow and I told him to go ahead and defrag is fast as hell!!
#15
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: AZ
Posts: 1,816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
youre not really getting any benefit from defraging your PCs HD
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've seen a hard drive so bad that the defrag would not get past 1%. And if you want to see a system run slow. This PC had a lot of applications installed and uninstalled. To fix this problem the hard drive needed to be reformatted.
#17
DVD Talk Legend
Originally posted by kegman
I've seen a hard drive so bad that the defrag would not get past 1%. And if you want to see a system run slow. This PC had a lot of applications installed and uninstalled. To fix this problem the hard drive needed to be reformatted.
I've seen a hard drive so bad that the defrag would not get past 1%. And if you want to see a system run slow. This PC had a lot of applications installed and uninstalled. To fix this problem the hard drive needed to be reformatted.
#18
DVD Talk Legend
http://www.thirdring.net/tips/pcmyths.htm
For the most part, this is just not true -- although there is a small grain of truth here. The reality is that the increases you will see in both performance and free space are negligible, and will more than likely be negated after a couple of hours of normal usage. Defrag utilities date back to the early days of computing, when disk drives were small and slow (at least relative to what you see today). And back then, yes -- occasionally defragging your hard drive would yield some sustained benefits. But with the size and speed of today's drives, defragging a drive is for the most part a waste of time.
Sometimes you will also hear someone suggest defragging the hard drive as a solution to some type of problem with a program that is not working correctly (i.e., program or system crashes). That's total hogwash. All a defrag does is re-organize the data on your hard disk. There's just no way that's going to fix a misbehaving program! As with Myth #1, don't ever let a tech support person tell you a defrag is the answer to your problem.
http://www.arachne.cz/index.shtml?clanekid=53
Myth #1: Defrag will speed up your disk.
Wrong. Defrag by itself is almost useless. It can even make your disk problems WORSE. Defrag only organizes the files already on your disk to make sequential access within each file possible. So, each file BY ITSELF can be read faster. If the many files you need are spread all over the disk instead of being organized together there will be no improvement. Plus, the process of defragging moves clusters around and will spread the available empty clusters randomly between your defragged files guaranteeing that any new, and ALL transient files, will be severely fragmented. The only thing that is worthwhile is a full optimize wherein all files in the partition will be organized in sequential clusters and moved toward the front of the disk, squeezing out empty clusters. This leaves the empty space defragged.Test example on a 20Mhz '386 with 32mb C: partition: (PCDOS3.3)
Initial speedchk: 2:00, 2:03 total.
After defrag:2:21, 2:24 total,that's 17% worse.
After compacting:1:23, 1:24 total, almost twice as fast as defragged.
For the most part, this is just not true -- although there is a small grain of truth here. The reality is that the increases you will see in both performance and free space are negligible, and will more than likely be negated after a couple of hours of normal usage. Defrag utilities date back to the early days of computing, when disk drives were small and slow (at least relative to what you see today). And back then, yes -- occasionally defragging your hard drive would yield some sustained benefits. But with the size and speed of today's drives, defragging a drive is for the most part a waste of time.
Sometimes you will also hear someone suggest defragging the hard drive as a solution to some type of problem with a program that is not working correctly (i.e., program or system crashes). That's total hogwash. All a defrag does is re-organize the data on your hard disk. There's just no way that's going to fix a misbehaving program! As with Myth #1, don't ever let a tech support person tell you a defrag is the answer to your problem.
http://www.arachne.cz/index.shtml?clanekid=53
Myth #1: Defrag will speed up your disk.
Wrong. Defrag by itself is almost useless. It can even make your disk problems WORSE. Defrag only organizes the files already on your disk to make sequential access within each file possible. So, each file BY ITSELF can be read faster. If the many files you need are spread all over the disk instead of being organized together there will be no improvement. Plus, the process of defragging moves clusters around and will spread the available empty clusters randomly between your defragged files guaranteeing that any new, and ALL transient files, will be severely fragmented. The only thing that is worthwhile is a full optimize wherein all files in the partition will be organized in sequential clusters and moved toward the front of the disk, squeezing out empty clusters. This leaves the empty space defragged.Test example on a 20Mhz '386 with 32mb C: partition: (PCDOS3.3)
Initial speedchk: 2:00, 2:03 total.
After defrag:2:21, 2:24 total,that's 17% worse.
After compacting:1:23, 1:24 total, almost twice as fast as defragged.
Last edited by joltaddict; 08-16-02 at 09:19 AM.
#19
DVD Talk Legend
Originally posted by s}{ammer
I don't need a benchmark or a help desk person to tell me that defragging is needed to keep a system running at peak performance. I see it every single day.
I don't need a benchmark or a help desk person to tell me that defragging is needed to keep a system running at peak performance. I see it every single day.
So in other words... "I dont care what the numbers say I believe it".
#21
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Originally posted by joltaddict
Another PDF File saying the same thing... www.dbatoolbox.com/WP2001/spacemgmt/ Myths%20About%20Extents.pdf
From MS themselves...
Fragmentation does not noticeably impact performance, because of the way Windows uses the paging file.[snip]Windows pages through the paging file in 4-kilobyte (KB) blocks, even if the paging file is contiguous.
For example, if Windows reads 40 KB of contiguous space from the disk, the paging file is actually read 10 separate times, once for each 4-KB block.http://support.microsoft.com/default...=DE&SD=SO&FR=0
Another PDF File saying the same thing... www.dbatoolbox.com/WP2001/spacemgmt/ Myths%20About%20Extents.pdf
From MS themselves...
Fragmentation does not noticeably impact performance, because of the way Windows uses the paging file.[snip]Windows pages through the paging file in 4-kilobyte (KB) blocks, even if the paging file is contiguous.
For example, if Windows reads 40 KB of contiguous space from the disk, the paging file is actually read 10 separate times, once for each 4-KB block.http://support.microsoft.com/default...=DE&SD=SO&FR=0
Last edited by Aghama; 08-16-02 at 09:15 AM.
#22
DVD Talk Legend
Originally posted by kegman
I am a support tech.
I am a support tech.
Originally posted by kegman
If you don't defrag it will greatly reduce your access time. I've seen them so bad that it won't get past 1% while defraging. 750mhz seem like 250mhz.
If you don't defrag it will greatly reduce your access time. I've seen them so bad that it won't get past 1% while defraging. 750mhz seem like 250mhz.
#23
DVD Talk Legend
Originally posted by Aghama
Dude, what are you smoking (wait, don't answer that). The first link is talking about database fragmentation in Oracle, the second about the Windows paging file.
Dude, what are you smoking (wait, don't answer that). The first link is talking about database fragmentation in Oracle, the second about the Windows paging file.
#25
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Originally posted by joltaddict
The paging shows how HDs work which some here dont seem to grasp.
The paging shows how HDs work which some here dont seem to grasp.