Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

Directors who have changed artistic direction (decided to go for the paycheck)

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

Directors who have changed artistic direction (decided to go for the paycheck)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-03-07 | 02:25 AM
  #26  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,046
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Rampaging across DVDTalk.
Originally Posted by Apone
I haven't seen Miami Vice and it is too soon to judge but I still stand by my opinion that Mann has changed his direction both "artistically" and technically (camera) to more "commercial appeal."
I would argue that point because of stories of how hard I've heard it was for Fincher to use the Viper for Zodiac. When you're getting into films of this scale, there is certainly a lot of pressure against adopting any new form of technology. The major studios are old dinosaurs who don't like change. Why else have they been shooting on the same technology for over 100 years! In stepping away from the traditional 35mm process, I think Mann is looking to go in new directions artistically.
Old 02-03-07 | 02:37 AM
  #27  
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I heard from an interview with him that Spy Kids and the sharkboy and lavagirl movies were all just experiments to work on animation to do movies like Sin City.
I'd like you to provide a link to this quote because I doubt it's true.

I never saw "Sharkboy and Lavagirl" (which, come to think of it, is the only RR film I've never seen) but it's obvious by watching the "Spy Kids" movies (at least the first two) that they're a real labor of love for Robert Rodriguez. When it comes to direction they're arguably the most inventive of his entire filmography and he's always been very enthusiastic about them in interviews.
Old 02-03-07 | 03:40 AM
  #28  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I couldn't help to feel disappointed that he has now reached to a point of re-making an already established film.
That's not the first remake he's done.
Old 02-03-07 | 03:41 AM
  #29  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,479
Received 11 Likes on 6 Posts
From: B.C., Canada
Sam Raimi
Old 02-03-07 | 05:18 AM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally Posted by Fincher Fan
I think Mann is looking to go in new directions artistically.
You're right there. However I still stand by my first half of statement regarding his use of previous film characters (not genre), plot and set design especially costume. The reason why I said Michael Mann was his rehash of Heat for a stand alone movie that appears leveled down to today's blockbuster standards. Expect made it more glamorous by maybe adopting newest technology and featuring once again veteran actors like Jamie Foxx who happens to play another leading role for Mann's next film. It is too soon to say Mann has changed from whatever "artistic" qualities but I have a hunch that he has changed.


Originally Posted by GreenVulture
That's not the first remake he's done.
So he has done it not for the first time but for a second time. Well, he is still helluva director and one of the most capable movie brats era.
Old 02-03-07 | 11:54 AM
  #31  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 8,572
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Philadelphia
Originally Posted by GreenVulture
To be fair, he did that one in return for making the most controversial movie of his career.
Old 02-03-07 | 01:10 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wendersfan
Zhang Yimou
Bingo. He found it was much more profitable to love Big Brother.
Old 02-03-07 | 01:47 PM
  #33  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Central Jersey
Originally Posted by freshticles
Sam Raimi
I agree with this one. I consider "The Quick and the Dead" to be the last real Raimi film. They always toy with the idea of making another Evil Dead/Army of Darkness but I just don't think he has it in him anymore.
Old 02-03-07 | 02:21 PM
  #34  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,424
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Auburn University
Sam Raimi gets the sweet job of making Spider-Man films, not selling out, they are actually good films. Plus, I thought A Simple Plan and For Love of the Game were good films. Didn't he start up that production company for horror films?
Old 02-03-07 | 02:36 PM
  #35  
Brent L's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 13,617
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Upstate, SC
Originally Posted by GuruTwo
I'd like you to provide a link to this quote because I doubt it's true.

I never saw "Sharkboy and Lavagirl" (which, come to think of it, is the only RR film I've never seen) but it's obvious by watching the "Spy Kids" movies (at least the first two) that they're a real labor of love for Robert Rodriguez. When it comes to direction they're arguably the most inventive of his entire filmography and he's always been very enthusiastic about them in interviews.
I've seen where he's said pretty much what the other poster said also, in more than one interview. He didn't say it in a way bashing the Spy Kids movies though, but he did say it.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.